Abstract
Pseudo-static seismic analysis of retaining walls requires the selection of an equivalent seismic coefficient synthetically representing the effects of the transient seismic actions on the soil-wall system. In this paper, a rational criterion for the selection of the equivalent seismic coefficient is proposed with reference to sliding retaining walls. In the proposed approach earthquake-induced permanent displacements are assumed as a suitable parameter to assess the seismic performance and an alternative definition of the wall safety factor is introduced comparing expected and limit values of permanent displacements. Using a simplified displacement prediction model it is shown that, for a given design earthquake, reliable values of the equivalent seismic coefficient should depend on all the factors affecting the stability condition of the soil-wall system and on a threshold value of permanent displacement related to a given ultimate or serviceability limit state. To achieve a match between the results of the pseudo-static and of the displacement-based analysis, the proposed procedure detects the value of the equivalent seismic coefficient for which the two approaches provide the same factor of safety. Thus, without necessarily carrying out a displacement analysis, a measure of the safety condition of a soil-wall system consistent with the actual seismic performance may be achieved through an equivalent pseudo-static analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambraseys NN, Menu JM (1988) Earthquake-induced ground displacement. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16(7):985–1006
Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen R (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 438–483
Ausilio E, Silvestri F, Troncone A, Tropeano G (2007) Seismic displacement analysis of homogeneous slopes: a review of existing simplified methods with reference to Italian seismicity. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference, ICEGE, Thessaloniki, Greece, paper no 1614
Biondi G, Cascone E (2014) Seismic displacements of sliding retaining walls (submitted for publication)
Biondi G, Cascone E, Rampello S (2011) Valutazione del comportamento dei pendii in condizioni sismiche. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica XLV(1):9–32
Caltabiano S, Cascone E, Maugeri M (1999) Sliding response of gravity retaining walls. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Lisbon, pp 285–290
Caltabiano S, Cascone E, Maugeri M (2000) Seismic stability of retaining walls with surcharge. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20(5–8):469–476
Caltabiano S, Cascone E, Maugeri M (2005) A procedure for seismic design of retaining wall. In: Maugeri M (ed) Chapter 14 in Seismic prevention of damage: a case study in a Mediterranean city. Wit Press, Ashurst, pp 263–277
Caltabiano S, Cascone E, Maugeri M (2012) Static and seismic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding retaining walls under different surcharge conditions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 37:38–55
Cascone E, Biondi G (2014) A rational criterion for the selection of pseudo-static coefficients for sliding retaining walls (submitted for publication)
Chlimintzas G (2002) Seismic displacements of slopes using multi-block sliding technique. PhD thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Coulomb CA (1776) Essai sur une application des règles de maximis et minimis a quelques problèmes de statique relatifs a l’architecture. Memoirs Academie Royal Pres. Division Sav. 7, Paris, France (in French)
European Committee for Standardization (2003) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. CEN, Brussels, Belgium
Evangelista A, Scotto di Santolo A (2010) Evaluation of pseudostatic active earth pressure coefficient of cantilever retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 30:1119–1128
Fang YS, Yang YC, Chen TJ (2003) Retaining wall damaged in the Chi-Chi earthquake. Can Geotech J 40:1142–1153
Greco VR (2009) Seismic active thrust on cantilever walls with short heel. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(2):249–252
Huang C-C, Chen Y-H (2004) Seismic stability of soil retaining walls situated on slope. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(1): 45–57
Hwang GS, Chen CH (2012) A study of the Newmark sliding block displacement functions. Bull Earthq Eng 11(2):481–502
Inglès J, Darrozes J, Soula J-C (2006) Effects of vertical component of ground shaking on earthquake-induced landslides displacements using generalized Newmark’s analysis. Eng Geol 8:134–147
Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91(2–4):209–218
Kloukinas P, Mylonakis G (2011) Rankine solution for seismic earth pressures on L-shaped retaining walls. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering. Santiago, Chile, paper no RSSKL
Koseki J, Tatsuoka F, Munaf Y, Tateyama M, Kojima K (1998) A modified procedure to evaluate active earth pressure at high seismic loads. Soils Found (special issue on Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake) 2:209–216
Ling HI, Leshchinsky D (1998) Effects of vertical acceleration on seismic design of geosynthetic reinforced soil structures. Geotechnique 48(3):347–373
Ling HI, Leshchinsky D, Mohri Y (1997) Soil slopes under combined horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:1231–1241
Madiai C (2009) Correlazioni tra parametri del moto sismico e spostamenti attesi del blocco di Newmark. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 1/09:23–43
Mononobe N, Matsuo H (1929). On the determination of earth pressure during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of world engineering conference, vol IX, paper no 388
Motta E (1993) Sulla valutazione della spinta attiva in terrapieni di altezza finita. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica XXVII(3):235–245
Motta E (1994) Generalized Coulomb active-earth pressure for distanced surcharge. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(6):1072–1079
Mylonakis G, Kloukinas P, Papantonopoulos C (2007) An alternative to the Mononobe–Okabe equations for seismic earth pressures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:957–969
Nadim F, Whitman RV (1983) Seismically induced movement of retaining walls. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109(7):915–931
Newmark NM (1965) Effect of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15:139–159
Okabe S (1926) General theory of Earth pressure. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 12(1):1277–1323
Rathje EM, Abrahamson NA, Bray JD (1998) Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquakes ground motions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(2):150–159
Richards R, Elms D (1979) Seismic behaviour of gravity retaining walls. J Geotech Eng ASCE 105(4):449–464
Sarma SK, Chlimintzas G (2000) Second edited report for the project ENV4-CT97-0392. European Commission DGXII for Science Research and Development
Sarma SK, Scorer MR (2009) The effect of vertical accelerations on seismic slope stability. In: Kokusho T, Tsukamoto Y, Yoshimine M (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 889–896
Saygili G, Rathje EM (2008) Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(6):790–803
Shukla SK, Gupta SK, Sivakugan N (2009) Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c - \(\Phi \) soil backfill under seismic loading condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(5):690–696
Stamatopoulos CA, Velgaki EG (2001) Critical acceleration and seismic displacement of vertical gravity walls by a two body model. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. San Diego, CA, paper no 7.22, 26–31 March 2001
Stamatopoulos CA, Velgaki EG, Modaressi A, Lopez-Caballero F (2006) Seismic displacement of gravity walls by a two body model. Bull Earthq Eng 4:295–318
Tateyama M, Tatsuoka F, Koseki J, Horii K (1995) Damage to soil retaining walls for railway embankments during the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. In: Proceedings of 1st ICEGE, Tokyo
Taylor M, Kontoe S, Sarma S (2007) A review of performance based design procedures for gravity retaining structures under seismic loading. In: Proceedings 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, 4ICEGE, Thessaloniki, paper 1520
Trandafir AC, Kamai T, Sidle RC (2009) Earthquake induced displacements of gravity walls and anchor-reinforced walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:428–437
Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) A study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:581–626
Whitman RV, Liao S (1984) Seismic design of gravity retaining walls. In: Proceedings of 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, vol III, pp 533–540
Wu Y, Prakash S (2001) Seismic displacement of rigid retaining walls—state of the art. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil dynamics. San Diego, CA, paper no 7.05
Yan L, Matasovic N, Kavazanjian E Jr (1996) Seismic response of rigid block on inclined plane to vertical and horizontal ground motions acting simultaneously. In: Proceedings of 11th ASCE engineering mechanics conference. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, vol 2, pp 1110–1114
Yegian MK, Marciano EA, Gharaman VG (1991) Earthquake-induced permanent displacement deformations: probabilistic approach. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117(1):35–50
Zarrabi-Kashani K (1979) Sliding of gravity retaining walls during earthquake considering vertical acceleration and changing inclination of failure surface. MS thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, USA
Zeng X, Steedman RS (2000) Rotating block method for seismic displacement of gravity walls. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126(8):709–717
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Dipartimento della Protezione Civile in the framework of the Research Project ReLUIS/DPC 2010-2013 (Thematic area AT-2, Task 2.1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix
For the soil-wall systems shown in Figs. 1a, 2 this Appendix lists the equations derived by Biondi and Cascone (2014) and by Cascone and Biondi (2014) for the evaluation of the critical,\( k_\mathrm{h,c}\), and of the equivalent, \(k_\mathrm{h,eq}\), seismic coefficients and of the displacement factor \(C_\mathrm{w}\) assuming \(k_\mathrm{v}\) \(=\) 0 (\(\Omega \) \(=\) 0).
Appendix 1: Horizontal component of the critical acceleration coefficient, \(k_\mathrm{h,c}\): R–E procedure
\(k_\mathrm{h,c}\) can be computed solving, iteratively, the following equation (Biondi and Cascone 2014):
where \(c_\mathrm{b}\) and \(\upphi _\mathrm{b}\) are the shear strength parameters at the wall-foundation soil interface, \(B_\mathrm{b}\) is the wall base width, \(\upalpha _\mathrm{b}\) is the inclination of the wall base to the horizontal and \(H\) is the height of the retained soil having a unit weight \(\upgamma \);
is the ratio of the vertical to the horizontal seismic coefficient at limit equilibrium;
is the normalized wall weight (\(W_\mathrm{w}\) is the wall weight);
\(K_\mathrm{ae,c}\) is the value at limit equilibrium of the Mononobe–Okabe active earth-pressure coefficient \(K_\mathrm{ae}\):
with:
In the case of horizontal wall base (\(\upalpha _\mathrm{b}\) \(=\) 0; Fig. 1a) Eqs. 31 and 32 reduce to:
If the vertical component of the ground acceleration is neglected (\(k_\mathrm{v}\) \(=\) 0; \(\Omega \) \(=\) 0), it is:
Appendix 2: Horizontal component of the critical acceleration coefficient: 2-\(W\) procedure
For the case \(c_\mathrm{b}\) \(=\) 0 and \(\upalpha _\mathrm{b}\) \(=\) 0, the horizontal component of the critical acceleration coefficient \(k_\mathrm{h,c}\) can be computed through the following equation (Biondi and Cascone 2014):
where:
being:
Appendix 3: Wall displacement factor \(C_\mathrm{w}\)
For the case \(c_\mathrm{b}\) \(=\) 0 the wall displacement factor \(C_\mathrm{w}\) is (Biondi and Cascone 2014):
where:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biondi, G., Cascone, E. & Maugeri, M. Displacement versus pseudo-static evaluation of the seismic performance of sliding retaining walls. Bull Earthquake Eng 12, 1239–1267 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9542-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9542-4