Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 311–339 | Cite as

Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE)

  • S. Akkar
  • M. A. Sandıkkaya
  • M. Şenyurt
  • A. Azari Sisi
  • B. Ö. Ay
  • P. Traversa
  • J. Douglas
  • F. Cotton
  • L. Luzi
  • B. Hernandez
  • S. Godey
Original Research Paper

Abstract

This paper presents the overall procedure followed in order to assemble the most recent pan-European strong-motion databank: Reference Database for Seismic Ground-Motion in Europe (RESORCE). RESORCE is one of the products of the SeIsmic Ground Motion Assessment (SIGMA; projet-sigma.com) project. RESORCE is intended to be a single integrated accelerometric databank for Europe and surrounding areas for use in the development and testing of ground-motion models and for other engineering seismology and earthquake engineering applications. RESORCE aims to contribute to the improvement of earthquake risk studies in Europe and surrounding areas. RESORCE principally updates and extends the previous pan-European strong-motion databank (Ambraseys et al. in Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 45:113–129, 2004a) with recently compiled Greek, Italian, Swiss and Turkish accelerometric archives. The updates also include earthquake-specific studies published in recent years. The current content of RESORCE includes 5,882 multi-component and uniformly processed accelerograms from 1,814 events and 1,540 strong-motion stations. The moment magnitude range covered by RESORCE is \(2.8 \le \hbox {M}_{\mathrm{w}} \le 7.8\). The source-to-site distance interval extends to 587 km and distance information is given by the common point- and extended-source distance measures. The paper presents the current features of RESORCE through simple statistics that also quantify the differences in metadata and strong-motion processing with respect to the previous version of the pan-European strong-motion databank.

Keywords

Pan-European strong-motion databank Strong-motion data processing Earthquake and strong-motion station metadata compilation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The strong-motion databank presented in this paper has been developed within the SeIsmic Ground Motion Assessment (SIGMA) project. The SIGMA project is funded and supported by EDF, AREVA, CEA and ENEL. The initial phase of the study used the SHARE strong-motion databank that is one of the deliverables of the SHARE (Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe) Project funded under contract 226967 of the EC-Research Framework Programme FP7. The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey provided financial support to the 2nd author for conducting some part of his doctoral studies in France. The authors benefitted significantly from the suggestions and comments of two anonymous reviewers for their comments for improving the quality of the article. The authors would like thank Mr. Ozkan Kale and Mr. Saeed Moghimi for their support during the data processing stage of RESORCE. The manuscript is revised thoroughly by Prof. Tanvir Wasti.

References

  1. Abercrombie RE, Main IG, Douglas A, Burton PW (1995) The nucleation and rupture process of the 1981 Gulf of Corinth earthquakes from deconvolved broad-band data. Geophys J Int 120:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1145–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkar S, Çağnan Z, Yenier E, Erdogan Ö, Sandıkkaya MA, Gülkan P (2010) The recently compiled Turkish strong-motion database: preliminary investigation for seismological parameters. J Seismol 14:457–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akkar S, Kale O, Yenier E, Bommer JJ (2011) The high-frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong-motion accelerograms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:1387–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambraseys NN (1978) Preliminary analysis of European strong-motion data 1965–1978. Bull Eur Assoc Earthq Eng 4:17–37Google Scholar
  6. Ambraseys NN (1990) Uniform magnitude re-evaluation of European earthquake associated with strong-motion records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ambraseys NN, Bommer JJ (1990) Uniform magnitude re-evaluation for the strong-motion database of Europe and adjacent regions. Eur Earthq Eng 4:3–16Google Scholar
  8. Ambraseys NN, Bommer JJ (1991) Database of European strong-motion records. Eur Earthq Eng 5:18–37Google Scholar
  9. Ambraseys N, Smit P, Berardi R, Rinaldis D, Cotton F, Berge-Thierry C (2000) Dissemination of European strong-motion data. CD-ROM collection. European Commission, Directorate General XII, Science, Research and Development, Environment and Climate Programme, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  10. Ambraseys NN, Smit P, Douglas J, Margaris B, Sigbjörnsson R, Olafsson S, Suhadolc P, Costa G (2004a) Internet site for European strong-motion data. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 45:113–129Google Scholar
  11. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sigbjörnsson R, Berge-Thierry C, Suhadolc P, Costa G, Smit PM (2004b) Dissemination of European strong-motion data, volume 2. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  12. Amorese D, Grasso JR, Plotnikova LM, Nurtaev BS, Bossu R (1995) Rupture kinematics of the three Gazli major earthquakes from vertical and horizontal displacement data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:552–559Google Scholar
  13. Anderson H, Jackson J (1987) Active tectonics of the Adriatic region. Geophy J R Astron Soc 91:937–983Google Scholar
  14. Anderson JG, Zeng Y, Sucuoglu H (2001) Analysis of accelerations from the 1 October 1995 Dinar, Turkey, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:1433–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Arvidsson R, Ekström G (1998) Global CMT analysis of moderateearthquakes, Mw4.5, using intermediate-period surface waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:1003–1013.Google Scholar
  16. Atkinson GM, Silva W (2000) Stochastic modeling of California ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bajc J, Aoudia A, Sarao A, Suhadolc P (2001) The 1998 Bovec-Krn mountain (Slovenia) earthquake sequence. Geophy Res Lett 28:1839–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Benetatos C, Kiratzi A (2006) Finite-fault slip models for the 15 April 1979 (\({\rm M_{\rm w}}\) 7.1) Montenegro earthquake and its strongest aftershock of 24 May 1979 (\({\rm M_{\rm w}}\) 6.2). Tectonophysics 421:129–143.Google Scholar
  19. Benetatos C, Dreger D, Kiratzi A (2007) Complex and segmented rupture associated with the 14 August 2003 Mw 6.2 Lefkada, Ionian Islands. Earthq Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Berberian M, Qorashi M, Jackson JA, Priestley K, Wallace T (1992) The Rudbar-Tarom earthquake of 20 June 1990 in N.W. Persia: preliminary field and seismological observations and its tectonic significance. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:1726–1755Google Scholar
  21. Bernard P, Gariel JC, Dorbath L (1997) Fault location and rupture kinematics of the magnitude 6.8, 1992 Erzincan earthquake, Turkey, from strong ground motion and regional records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:1230–1243Google Scholar
  22. Bommer JJ, Ambraseys NN (1992) An earthquake strong-motion databank and database. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, vol 1, pp 207–210Google Scholar
  23. Bommer JJ and Douglas D (2004) Processing of European strong-motion records at Imperial College London. In : Proceedings of the COSMOS wokshop on record processing guidelines, Richmond, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  24. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2007) Boore–Atkinson NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. In: PEER 2007/01, Pacific earthquake engineering research center, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Boore DM, Azari Sisi A, Akkar S (2012) Using pad-stripped acausally filtered strong-motion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:751–760Google Scholar
  26. Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms? Needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1993) Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: an interim report. Open-File Report 93–509, U.S. Geological Survey, 70 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Boore DM, Skarlatoudis AA, Margaris BN, Papazachos CB, Ventouzi C (2009) Along-arc and back-arc attenuation, site response, and source spectrum for the intermediate-depth 8 January 2006 M 6.7 Kythera, Greece. Earthq Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2410–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Campbell KW, Rowshandel B and Shantz T (2012) NGA-West2: A comprehensive research program to update ground motion prediction equations for shallow crustal regions in active tectonic regions. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon Portugal, Paper No. 2572Google Scholar
  30. Castello B, Olivieri M, Selvaggi G (2007) Local and duration magnitude determination for the Italian earthquake catalog, 1981–2002. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cauzzi C, Facciolli E (2008) Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol 12:453–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W (2008) NGA project strong-motion database. Earthq Spectra 24:23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Chouliaras G, Stavrakakis GN (1997) Seismic source parameters from a new dial-up network in Greece. Pure Appl Geophys 150:91–111.Google Scholar
  34. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) (2004). Eurocode 8, design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Standard NF EN 1998-1, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  35. Decriem J, Árnadóttir T, Hooper A, Geirsson H, Sigmundsson F, Keiding M, Ófeigsson BG, Hreinsdóttir S, Einarsson P, LaFemina P, Bennett RA (2010) The 2008 May 29 earthquake doublet in SW Iceland. Geophys J Int 181:1128–1146Google Scholar
  36. Delouis B, Giardini D, Lundgren P, Salichon J (2002) Joint inversion of InSAR, GPS, teleseismic, and strong-motion data for the spatial and temporal distribution of earthquake slip: application to the 1999 Izmit Mainshock. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:278–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Douglas J (2003) What is poor quality strong-motion record? Bull Earthq Eng 1:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Douglas J, Boore DM (2011) High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records. Bull Earthq Eng 9:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2004) CEUS Ground Motion Project: Final Report. EPRI Report 1009684 Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  40. Erdik M (1984) Report on the Turkish earthquake of October 30, 1983. Earthq Spectra 1:151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Evans JR (1982) Running median filters and a general despiker. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:331–338Google Scholar
  42. Frohlich C, Apperson KD (1992) Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundaries. Tectonics 11:279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haessler H, Gaulon R, Rivera L, Console R, Frogneux M, Gasparini G, Martel L, Patau G, Siciliano M, Cisternas A (1988) The Perugia (Italy) earthquake of 29, April, 1984: a microearthquake survey. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:1948–1964Google Scholar
  44. Hatzfeld D, Karakostas V, Ziazia M, Selvaggi G, Leborgne S, Berge C, Guiguet R, Paul A, Voidomatis P, Diagourtas D, Kassaras I, Koutsikos I, Makropoulus K, Azzara R, Di Mona M, Baccheschi S, Bernard P, Papaioannou (1997) The Kozani-Grevena (Greece) earthquake of 13 May 1995 revisited from a detailed seismological study. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:463–473Google Scholar
  45. Jackson J, Bouchon M, Fielding E, Funning G, Ghorashi M, Hatzfeld D, Nazari H, Parsons B, Priestley K, Talebian M, Tatar M, Walker R, Wright T (2006) Seismotectonic, rupture process, and earthquake-hazard aspects of the 2003 December 26 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Geophys J Int 166:1270–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaklamanos J, Baise LG, Boore DM (2011) Estimating unknown input parameters when implementing the NGA ground-motion prediction equations in engineering practice. Earthq Spectra 27:1219–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leonard M (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release Bull. Seismol Soc Am 100:1971–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Louvari E, Kiratzi AA, Papazacchos BC (2004) The Cephalonia Transform Fault and its extension to western Lefkada Island (Greece). Tectonophysics 308:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F, Sabetta F (2008) ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): a web portal for the dissemination of the Italian strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 79:716–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lyon-Caen H, Armijo R, Drakopoulos J, Baskoutass J, Delibassis N, Gaulon R, Kouskouna V, Latoussakis J, Makropoulos K, Papadimitriou P, Papanastassiou D, Pedotti G (1988) The 1986 Kalamata (south Peloponnesus) earthquake: detailed study of a normal fault, evidences for east-west extension in the Hellenic arc. J Geophys Res 93–B12:14967–15000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Makaris DI, Theodulidis NP, Stavrakakis GN (2000) Estimation of strong ground motion due to hypothetical fault ruptures and comparison with recorded values: the Zakynthos, Western Greece Earthquake of 18 November 1997. Nat Hazards 21:297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oncescu LC, Bonjer KP (1997) A note on the depth recurrence and strain release of large Vrancea earthquake. Tectonophysics 272:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pace B, Boncio P, Lavecchia G (2002) The 1984 Abruzzo earthquake (Italy): an example of seismogenic process controlled by interaction between differently oriented synkinematic faults. Tectonophysics 350:237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Papazachos BC, Karakostas VG, Kiratzi AA, Margaris BN, Papazachos CB, Scordilis EM (2002) Uncertainties in the estimation of earthquake magnitudes in Greece. J Seismol 6:557–570Google Scholar
  55. Pedersen R, Jónsson S, Árnadóttir T, Sigmundsson F, Feigl KL (2003) Fault slip distribution of two June 2000 \(M_w6.5\) earthquakes in South Iceland estimated from joint inversion of InSAR and GPS measurements. Earth Planet Sci Lett 213:487–502Google Scholar
  56. Perniola B, Bressan G, Pondrelli S (2004) Changes in failure stress and stress transfer during the 1976–77 Friuli earthquake sequence. Geophys J Int 156:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spectra 24:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosenblad BL, Rathje EM, Stokoe KH (2002) Shear wave velocity profiling by SASW method at selected strong-Motion stations in Turkey. Lifelines projects topic 2—Site Response Report No. 2A02a, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  59. Roumelioti Z, Kiratzi A (2002) Stochastic simulation of strong-motion records from the 15 April 1979 (M 7.1) Montenegro earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1095–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salvi S, Stramondo S, Cocco M, Tesauro M, Hunstad I, Anzidei M, Briole P, Baldi P, Sansosti E, Fornaro G, Lanari R, Doumaz F, Pesci A, Galvani A (2000) Modeling coseismic displacements resulting from SAR inferferometry and GPS measurements during the 1997 Umbria-Marche seismic sequence. J. Seismol 4:479–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sandıkkaya MA, Yılmaz MT, Bakır BS, Yılmaz Ö (2010) Site classification of Turkish national strong-motion stations. J Seismol 14:543–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scherbaum F, Schemedes J, Cotton F (2004) On the conversion of source-to-site distance measures for extended earthquake source models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1053–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Snoke JA (2003) FOCMEC: focal mechanism determinations. Int Handb Earthq Eng Seismol 81B:1629–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Soufleris C, Jackson JA, King GCP, Spencer CP, Scholz CH (1982) The 1978 earthquake sequence near Thessaloniki (northern Greece). Geophys J R Astron Soc 68:429–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Talebian M, Biggs J, Bolourchi M, Copley A, Ghassemi A, Ghorashi M, Hollingsworth J, Jackson J, Nissen E, Oveisi B, Parsons B, Priestley K, Saiidi A (2006) The Dahuiyeh (Zarand) earthquake of 2005 February 22 in central Iran: reactivation of an intramountain reverse fault. Geophys J Int 164:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tan O, Pabuçcu Z, Tapırdamaz MC, İnan S, Ergintav S, Eyidogan H, Aksoy E, Kuluöztürk F (2011) Aftershock study and seismotectonic implications of the 8 March 2010 Kovancılar (Elazıg, Turkey) earthquake (MW = 6.1). Geophys Res Lett 38-L11304, doi: 10.1029/2011GL047702
  67. Tatar M, Jackson J, Hatzfeld D, Bergman E (2007) The 2004 May 28 Baladeh earthquake (Mw 6.2) in the Alborz, Iran: overthrusting the South Caspian Basin margin, partitioning of oblique convergence and the seismic hazard of Tehran. Geophys J Int 170:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Theodulidis N, Kalogeras I, Papazachos C, Karastathis V, Margaris B, Papaioannou Ch, Skarlatoudis A (2004) HEAD 1. O: a unified HEllenic accelerogram database. Seismol Res Lett 75:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Triep EG, Abers GA, Lerner-Lam AL (1995) Active thrust front of the greater Caucasus: the April 29, 1991, Racha earthquake sequence and its tectonic implications. J Geoph Res 100–B3:4011–4033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI (2001) A note on the usable dynamic range of accelerographs recording translation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:275–286Google Scholar
  71. Tselentis GA, Melis NS, Sokos E, Papatsimpa K (1996) The Egion June 15, 1995 (6.2ML) earthquake, western Greece. Pure Appl Geophys 147:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tselentis GA, Zahradnik J (2000) Aftershock monitoring of the Athens earthquake of 7 September 1999. Seismol Res Lett 71:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Umutlu N, Koketsu K, Milkerit C (2004) The rupture process during the 1999 Düzce, Turkey earthquake from joint inversion of teleseismic and strong motion data. Tectonophysics 391:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walker R, Jackson J, Baker C (2003) Surface expression of thrust faulting in eastern Iran: source parameters and surface deformation on the 1978 Tabas and 1968 Ferdows earthquake sequences. Geophys J Int 152:729–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walker RT, Bergman E, Jackson J, Ghorashi M, Talebian M (2005) The 2002 June 22 Changureh (Avaj) earthquake in Qazvin province, northwest Iran: epicentral relocation, source parameters, surface deformation and geomorphology. Geophy J Int 160:707–720.Google Scholar
  76. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002Google Scholar
  77. Yenier E, Sandıkkaya MA, Akkar S (2010). Report on the fundamental features of the extended strong motion databank prepared for the SHARE project, pp. 44. Deliverable 4.1 of Seventh Framework Programme Project Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE), 34 pages, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  78. Zoback ML (1992) First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the world stress map project. J Geophys Res 97:11703–11728CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Akkar
    • 1
  • M. A. Sandıkkaya
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Şenyurt
    • 3
  • A. Azari Sisi
    • 1
  • B. Ö. Ay
    • 1
    • 4
  • P. Traversa
    • 5
  • J. Douglas
    • 6
  • F. Cotton
    • 2
  • L. Luzi
    • 7
  • B. Hernandez
    • 8
  • S. Godey
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research CenterMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Institut des Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre)Universite de Grenoble GrenobleFrance
  3. 3.Kalyon İnşaatIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering PaviaItaly
  5. 5.CEIDRE-TEGGElectricité de France (EDF) Aix-en-ProvenceFrance
  6. 6.DRP/RSVBureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minères (BRGM)OrléansFrance
  7. 7.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) MilanoItaly
  8. 8.Laboratoire de detection et de GéophysiqueCEA, DAM, DIF ArpajonFrance
  9. 9.Euro-Mediterranean Seismological Centrec/o CEA DAM, DIF ArpajonFrance

Personalised recommendations