Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relevant features of the valley seismic response: the case study of Tuscan Northern Apennine sector

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so called “valley effect” relates to the typical seismic response of basin shaped bedrock filled by quaternary sediments. It is an aspect of the renown “local seismic effect” that shall be taken into account when dealing with microzoning studies. Several experimental surveys and numerical simulations performed worldwide over the last 40 years, confirmed that valley responses under seismic excitations show common features in various geological contexts as far as the sedimentary valleys (e.g. alluvial and lacustrine plains), the intermountain valleys (e.g. alpine valleys) and graben shaped basins. Such features mainly depend on the basin geometry, referred to as the shape ratio SR, and the sediment and basin impedance contrast IC. Although researchers agree on the prominent role of local seismic effects for interpreting erratic damages caused by seismic shaking in urbanized areas, no fully shared strategies have been identified for taking into account valley effect within microzoning studies. In this paper, a numerical simulations on three models of trapezoidal shaped basins have been performed. These valley models relate to sediments and basins detected within the Tuscany Region territory during the VEL project. Results, in terms of the amplification index \(\text{ F }_{\mathrm{A}}\) have been provided. Three “valley effect charts” for various SR and IC values have been propose for taking into account the local seismic effects due to the basin amplifications within microzoning maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAVV (2004) Guide Geologiche Regionali. Appennino Tosco-Emiliano. BE-MA, Firenze

  • Barchi M, Landuzzi A, Minelli G, Pialli G (2001) Outer Northern Apennines. In: Vai GB, Martini IP (eds) Anatomy of an orogen. The Apennines and adjacent Mediterranean Basins. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Great Britain, pp 215–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard PY, Bouchon M (1980a) The seismic response of sediment-filled valleys. Part I. The case of incident SH waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1263–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard PY, Bouchon M (1980b) The seismic response of sediment-filled valleys. Part II. The case of incident P and SV waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1921–1941

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard PY, Bouchon M (1985) The two-dimensional resonance of sediment-filled valleys. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(2):519–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardet JP, Ichii K, Lin CH (2000) EERA: a computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. University of Southern California, Department of Civil Engineering

  • Bartolini C (2001) When did the Northern Apennine become a mountain chain? Quat Int 101:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti M (1995) Il controllo strutturale nei bacini intermontani plio-pleistocenici dell’Appennino settentrionale: l’esempio della successione fluvio-lacustre del Mugello (Firenze). Il Quaternario 8:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2007) Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions. J Earthq Engi 11:13–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielak J, Xu J, Ghattas O (1999) Earthquake ground motion and structural response in alluvial valleys. J Geotech Geoenviron Engi 125(5):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosi C, Messina P, Moro M (2004) Quaternary geological map of the upper Aterno valley (Central Italy). In Pasquarè G and Venturini C (Ed) Mapping geology in Italy, 32nd International Geological Congress (32IGC), Florence, Italy pp 20–28

  • Bossio A, Costantini A, Lazzarotto A, Liotta D, Mazzanti R, Mazzei R, Salvatorini G, Sandrelli F (1993) Rassegna delle conoscenze sulla stratigrafia del neoautoctono toscano. Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 49:17–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro RR, Pacor F, Bindi D, Franceschina G, Luzi L (2004) Site response of strong motion stations in the Umbria region, Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:576–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauzzi C, Faccioli E, Costa G (2010) 1D and 2D site amplification effects at Tarcento (Friuli, NE Italy), 30 years later. J Seismol, doi:10.1007/s10950-010-9202-y

  • Chávez-García FJ, Faccioli E (2000) Complex site effects and building codes: making the leap. J Seimol 4:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2003) “Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part. 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

  • CNR-PFG (1987) Neotectonic Map of Italy. Quaderni de la Ricerca Scientifica 114

  • D’Amato G, De Lucia PL, Nardi R, Pochini A, Puccinelli A, Trivellino M (1986) Carta geologica e Carta della Franosità della Garfagnana e della Valle del Serchio (Lucca) in scala 1:10.000, tipografia SELCA

  • Day SM, Bielak J, Dreger D, Graves R, Larsen S, Olse KB, Pitarka A, and Ramirez-Guzman L (2006) Numerical simulation of basin effects on long-period ground motion. In: 8th National Conference of Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, pp 18–22

  • Delgado J, Faccioli E, Paolucci R (2001) Influence of complex amplification effects on ground motion: the case of an alpine valley in Northern Italy. In: Faccioli P (ed) CAFEEL-ECOEST2/ICONS Report 1, LNEC, Lisbon, “Seismic Action”

  • DM 14 gennaio (2008) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. G.U. n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008

  • Faccioli E, Vanini M (1998) Studio della risposta sismica locale nella zona di Trento Nord. Technical Report for the Autonomous Province of Trento, Italy (in italian)

  • Faccioli E, Vanini M (2003) Complex seismic site effects in sediment-filled valleys and implications on design spectra. Earthq Engi struct dyn 5:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti S, Lo Presti D, Pallara O, Rainone ML, Signanini P (2002) Indagini geotecniche e geofisiche per la caratterizzazione del sito di Castelnuovo Garfagnana (Lucca). Rivista Geotecnica Italiana 3:42–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (1997) Contribution of National Technical University of Athens (Soil Mechanics and Soil Dynamics Laboratory). In: Faccioli E (ed) TRISEE—3D Site Effects and Soil-Foundation Interaction in Earthquake and Vibration Risk Evaluation—First year Project report to the European Commission. Environment and Climate Programme, Milan

  • Gelagoti F, Gazetas G, Kourkoulis R (2007) 2D wave effects in alluvial valleys: how important and predictable are they?. In: 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 25–28

  • Gruppo di lavoro CPTI (2004) Catalogo parametrico dei terremoti italiani, versione 2004 (CPTI04), INGV Bologna, http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI04

  • Guidoboni E, Comastri A (2005), Catalogue of Earthquakes and tsunamis in the Mediterranean Area from the 11th to the 15th century. INGV-SGA, Bologna, 1037

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C (2010) REXEL 2.61 beta - Computer aided code-based real record selection for seismic analysis of structures [v 2.61 beta - built 06/04/10]. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II. tutorial, available at: http://www.reluis.it/doc/software/rexeltutorialeng.pdf

  • King JL, Tucker BE (1984) Observed variations of earthquake motion across a sediment-filled valley. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(1):137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahn J (2004) Dynamic modeling with Quake/W. Geoslope International Ltd, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlemeyer L, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Div 99:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai C, Strobbia C, Dall’ara M (2005) Convenzione tra Regione Toscana e Eucentre. Parte 1. Definizione dell’Input Sismico per i Territori della Lunigiana e della Garfagnana. L.R. 56/97 programma VEL

  • Lanzo G, Pagliaroli A (2009) Numerical modeling of site effects at San Giuliano di Puglia (southern Italy) during the 2002 molise seismic sequence. J Geotech Geoenviron Engi 135(9):1295–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti DC, Squeglia N, Baglione M, Ferrini M, Mensi E, Pallara O (2007a) Caratterizzazione meccanica dei depositi di terreni mediante prove penetrometriche dinamiche alla luce dei risultati acquisiti nell’ambito del progetto VEL della Regione Toscana. In 12simo Convegno L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia. Pisa 1, pp 315–327

  • Lo Presti DC, Squeglia N, Baglione M, Ferrini M, Mensi E, Pallara O (2007b) Caratterizzazione meccanica dei depositi di terreni mediante prove di laboratorio per l’analisi di risposta sismica alla luce dei risultati acquisiti nell’ambito del progetto VEL della Regione Toscana. In 12simo Convegno L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia. Pisa, 1, pp. 302–314

  • Luzi L, Bindi D, Franceschina G, Pacor F, Castro RR (2005) Geotechnical site characterisation in the Umbria Marche area and evaluation of Earthquake site-response. Pure Appl Geophys 162:2133–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makra K, Chavez-Garcia FJ, Raptakis D, Pitilakis K (2005) Parametric analysis of the seismic response of a 2D sedimentary valley: implications for code implementations of complex site effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Engi 25:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantovani E, Viti M, Babbucci D, Cenni N, Tamburelli C, Vannucchi A, Falciani F, Fianchisti G, Baglione M, D’intinosante V, Fabbroni P (2011) Sismotettonica dell’Appennino settentrionale. Implicazioni per la pericolosità sismica della Toscana, Centro stampa Giunta Regione Toscana

  • Martini IP, Sagri M (1993) Tectono-sedimentary characteristics of Late Miocene-Quaternary extensional basins of the Northern Apennines, Italy. Earth Sci Rev 34:197–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti D, Guidoboni E (2006), Seven missing damaging earthquakes in Upper Valtiberina (Central Italy) in 16th-18th century: research strategies and historical sources. Annals of Geophysics, 49(6): 1139-1155

  • Meletti C, Moretti A, Scandone P (1993) Schema sismotettonico del segmento appenninico compreso tra il Passo della Cisae l’alta Val Tiberina. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Internal report ENEL-CRIS, p 34

  • Moretti A (1992) Evoluzione tettonica della Toscana settentrionale tra il Pliocene e l’Olocene. Bollettino della SocietàGeologica Italiana 111:459–492

    Google Scholar 

  • OPCM (Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri) n. 3274 del 20 marzo 2003 (2003) Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismico del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. G.U. n. 72

  • Paolucci R (1999) Shear resonance frequencies of alluvial valleys by Rayleigh’s method. Earthq Spectr 15(3):503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci R, Smerzini C (2011) 3D Numerical simulations of earthquake ground motion in sedimentary basins: the cases of Gubbio and l’Aquila, central Italy. 4th International Symposium IAEE, California, pp 23–26

  • Psarropoulos PN, Gazetas G (2007) Effects of soil non linearity on the geomorphic aggravation of ground motion in alluvial valleys. In: 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 25–28

  • Puglia R, Klin P, Pagliaroli A, Ladina C, Priolo E, Lanzo G, Silvestri F (2009) Analisi della risposta sismica locale a San Giuliano di Puglia con modelli 1D, 2D e 3D. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 63(3):62–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainone ML (2003) Istruzioni tecniche per le indagini geologico-tecniche, le indagini geofisiche e geotecniche, statiche e dinamiche, finalizzate alla valutazione degli effetti locali nei Comuni classificati sismici della Toscana. Direzione Generale Politiche Territoriali e Ambientali, Area Servizio Sismico Regionale

  • Roten D, Cornou C, Steimen S, Fäh D, Giardini D (2004) 2D resonances in Alpine Valleys identified from ambient vibration wavefields. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, pp 1–6

  • Russo S, Vessia G, Cherubini C (2008) Considerations on different features of local seismic effect numerical simulations: the case studied of Castelnuovo Garfagnana. In: 6th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, Arlington, pp 11–16

  • Silva WJ (1988) Soil response to earthquake ground motion. EPRI Report NP-5747. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

  • Signanini P, Ferrini M, Rainone ML, D’Intinosante V (2001) Metodi geofisici integrati per la ricostruzione del sottosuolo e per la caratterizzazione dinamica dei terreni negli studi di microzonazione sismica: alcuni esempi relativi al Progetto VEL. Regione Toscana. In: Vol. Abstract of GEOITALIA FIST, settembre, Chieti, pp 4–7

  • Tucker BE, King JL (1984) Dependence of sediment-filled valley response on input amplitude and valley properties. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(1):153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanini M, Pessina V, Di Giulio G, Lenti L (2007) Influence of alluvium filled basins and edge effect on displacement response spectra. Deliverable D19 of Project S5, available at http://progettos5.stru.polimi.it

  • Vessia G, Russo S, Lo Presti D (2011) A new proposal for the evaluation of the amplification coefficient due to valley effects in the simplified local seismic response analyses. Ital Geotech J 4:51–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Papageorgiou AS (1996) Simulation of the response of the Marina District basin, San Francisco, California, to the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(5):1328–1400

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering and Geology, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, Chieti Scalo, Italy

    G. Vessia

  2. Institute of Research for Hydrogeological Protection, National Research Council, Bari, Italy

    G. Vessia

  3. Polytechnic of Bari, Via Orabona, 4, Bari, Italy

    S. Russo

Authors
  1. G. Vessia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Vessia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vessia, G., Russo, S. Relevant features of the valley seismic response: the case study of Tuscan Northern Apennine sector. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1633–1660 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9456-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9456-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation