Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing attention has been addressed to the influence of infills on the seismic behavior of Reinforced Concrete buildings, also supported by the observation of damage to infilled RC buildings after severe earthquakes (e.g. L’Aquila 2009, Lorca 2011). In this paper, a numerical investigation on the influence of infills on the seismic behavior of four different case study buildings is carried out: four- and eight-storey buildings, designed for seismic loads according to the current Italian technical code or for gravity loads only according to an obsolete technical code, are considered. Seismic capacity at two Limit States (Damage Limitation and Near Collapse) is assessed through static push-over analyses, within the N2 spectral assessment framework. Different infill configurations are considered (Bare, Uniformly Infilled, Pilotis), and a sensitivity analysis is carried out, thus evaluating the influence of main material and capacity parameters on seismic response, depending on the number of storeys and the design typology. Fragility curves are obtained, through the application of a Response Surface Method. Seismic performance is also expressed in terms of failure probability, given a reference time period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bal IE, Crowley H, Pinho R, Gulay FG (2007) Structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock in Northern Marmara region for loss assessment applications. ROSE Research Report No. 2007/03, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy

  • Biskinis DE, Fardis MN (2010) Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars. Struct Concr 11(2):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabañas L, Carreño E, Izquierdo A, Martínez JM, Capote R, Martínez J, Benito B, Gaspar J, Rivas, A, García J, Pérez R, Rodríguez MA, Murphy P (2011) Informe del sismo de Lorca del 11 de mayo de 2011. IGN, UCM, UPM, IGME, AEIS, available at http://www.ign.es/ign/resources/sismologia/Lorca.pdf (in Spanish)

  • Calvi GM, Bolognini D, Penna A (2004) Seismic Performance of masonry-infilled RC frames–benefits of slight reinforcements. Invited lecture to “Sísmica 2004—\(6^{\circ }\) Congresso Nacional de Sismologia e Engenharia Sísmica”, Guimarães, Portugal, April 14–16

  • Celarec D, Dolšek M (2010) The influence of epistemic uncertainties on the seismic performance of RC frame building. In: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on earthquake engineering, Ohrid, Macedonia, August 30-September 3. Paper No. 534

  • Celarec D, Ricci P, Dolšek M (2012) The sensitivity of seismic response parameters to the uncertain modelling variables of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames. Eng Struct 35:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celarek D, Dolsek M (2012) Practice-oriented probabilistic seismic performance assessment of infilled frames with consideration of shear failure of columns. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn

  • CEN (1995) European Standard ENV 1998–1-1/2/3. Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures—part I: general rules. Technical Committee 250/SC8, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels

  • CEN (2005) European standard EN1998-3. Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures—part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels

  • Chrysostomou CZ, Gergely P, Abel JF (2002) A six-strut model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel infilled frames. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2(3):335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Circolare del Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici n. 617 del 2/2/2009. Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al D.M. 14 gennaio 2008. G.U. n. 47 del 26/2/2009 (in Italian)

  • Colangelo F (2012) A simple model to include fuzziness in the seismic fragility curve and relevant effect compared with randomness. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:969–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosenza E, Festa G, Manfredi G, Polese M, Realfonzo R, Verderame GM, Zollo A (2003) Comportamento strutturale in fase pre-eruttiva: il caso Vesuvio. In: Il Rischio Vesuvio—Strategie di prevenzione e di intervento. Giannini, Naples, Italy, pp 315–394 (in Italian)

  • Cosenza E, Galasso C, Maddaloni G (2009a) Resistenza del calcestruzzo: modellazione probabilistica e risultati sperimentali, Atti del XXV Convegno Nazionale AICAP “La progettazione e l’esecuzione delle opere strutturali nell’ottica della sostenibilità”, Pisa, Italy, May 14–16. Paper No. 59 (in Italian)

  • Cosenza E, Galasso C, Maddaloni G (2009b) Analisi statistica delle caratteristiche sismiche degli acciai da cemento armato, Atti del XXV Convegno Nazionale AICAP “La progettazione e l’esecuzione delle opere strutturali nell’ottica della sostenibilità”, Pisa, Italy, May 14–16. Paper No. 57 (in Italian)

  • Crisafulli FJ (1997) Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Crowley H, Colombi M, Borzi B, Faravelli M, Onida M, Lopez M, Polli D, Meroni F, Pinho R (2009) A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy. Bull Earthq Eng 7(1):149–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreto Ministeriale del 14/1/2008. Approvazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni. G.U. n. 29 del 4/2/2008. (in Italian).

  • Dolšek M (2010) Development of computing environment for the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames by using simplified nonlinear models. Bull Earthq Eng 8(6):1309–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2001) Soft storey effects in uniformly infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng 5(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2002) Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudo-dynamic tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(6):1215–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2004a) Inelastic spectra for infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(15):1395–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2004b) IN2—a simple alternative for IDA. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1–6. Paper No. 3353

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2005) Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2008a) The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame—a deterministic assessment. Eng Struct 30(7):1991–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2008b) The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame—a probabilistic assessment. Eng Struct 30(11):3186–3192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolsek M, Fajfar P (2006) Simplified seismic assessment of infilled reinforced concrete frames. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 September 2006. Paper Number 888

  • Dymiotis C, Kappos AJ, Chryssanthopoulos MK (2001) Seismic reliability of masonry-infilled RC frames. ASCE J Struct Eng 127(3):296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EERI (2000) 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake reconnaissance report. Earthq Spectra 16(S1):237–279

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:979–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P, Drobnič D (1998) Nonlinear seismic analyses of the ELSA buildings. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paris, France, September 6–11

  • Fajfar P, Gaspersic P (1996) The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fardis MN (1997) Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of RC infilled frames and recommendations for code provisions. Report ECOEST-PREC8 No. 6. Prenormative research in support of Eurocode 8

  • Fardis MN (2007) LESSLOSS—risk mitigation for earthquakes and landslides. Guidelines for displacement-based design of buildings and bridges. Report No. 5/2007, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy

  • Fardis MN (2009) Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete buildings based on EN-Eurocode 8. Springer

  • Fardis MN, Biskinis DE (2003) Deformation capacity of RC members, as controlled by flexure or shear. In: Performance-based engineering for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete structures: a volume honoring shunsuke Otani, pp 511–530

  • Fardis MN, Panagiotakos TB (1997) Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Part II: infilled structures. J Earthq Eng 1(3):475–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Martínez F, Pérez-García A, De Luca F, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2012) Preliminary study of the structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake. In: Proceedings of 15th WCEE, Lisbon, 24–28 September

  • Goula X, Figueras S, Irizarry J, Macau A, Barbat A, Lantada N, Carreño ML, Valcárcel J, Combescure D, Belvaux M, Monfort D, Bremond S, Verrhiest G, Camares C, Bairrao R (2011) “Rapport de la mission AFPS du séisme de Lorca”, available at http://www.afps-seisme.org/index.php/fre/Seismes-majeurs/Seisme-a-Lorca (in Spanish)

  • Hak P, Morandi G. Magenes TJ, Sullivan (2012) Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures. J Earthq Eng 16(sup1): 1–35

  • Iervolino I, De Luca F, Chioccarelli E, Dolce M (2010) L’azione sismica registrata durante il mainshock del 6 aprile 2009 a L’Aquila e le prescrizioni del D.M.14/01/2008 V. 1, available at http://www.reluis.it

  • INGV-DPC S1 (2007) Progetto S1. Proseguimento della assistenza al DPC per il completamento e la gestione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 e progettazione di ulteriori sviluppi. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia–Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, http://esse1.mi.ingv.it (in Italian)

  • Kappos AJ, Stylianidis KC, Michailidis CN (1998) Analytical models for brick masonry infilled R/C frames under lateral loading. J Earthq Eng 2(1):59–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Liel AB, Haselton CB, Deierlein GG, Baker JW (2009) Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Struct Saf 31(2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainstone RJ (1971) On the stiffnesses and strengths of infilled frames. Proc Inst Civil Eng (Suppl 4): 57–90

  • McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH (2004) OpenSees: open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu

  • Negro P, Colombo A (1997) Irregularities induced by nonstructural masonry panels in framed buildings. Eng Struct 19(7):576–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negro P, Verzeletti G (1996) Effect of infills on the global behaviour of R/C frames: energy considerations from pseudodynamic tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(8):753–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN (1996) Seismic response of infilled RC frames structures. In: 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, México, June 23–28, Paper No. 225

  • Panagiotakos TB, Kosmopoulos AJ, Fardis MN (2002) Displacement-based seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings. In: Proceedings of the 1st fib Congress, Osaka, Japan, October 13–19, pp 269–278

  • Pecce M, Polese M, Verderame GM (2003) Seismic vulnerability aspects of RC buildings in Benevento, proceedings of the workshop on multidisciplinary approach to seismic risk problems. September 22, Sant’Angelo dei Lombardi, Italy. In: Pecce M, Manfredi G, Zollo A (eds) 2004. The many facets of seismic risk, pp 134–141. CRdC AMRA

  • Pinto AV, Verzeletti G, Molina J, Varum H, Coelho E (2002) Pseudodynamic tests on non-seismic resisting RC frames (infilled frame and infill strengthened frame tests). Report EUR, EC, Joint Research Centre, Ispra

  • Pinto PE, Giannini R, Franchin P (2004) Seismic reliability analysis of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires F (1990) Influencia das paredes de alvenaria no comportamiento de estruturas reticuladas de betao armado subjectas a accoes horizontaes. Ph.D. Thesis, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese)

  • Pitilakis K (Project coordinator) (2012) Deliverable D4.6: Validation and Benchmarking socio-economic indicators determined in D4.1-4.4 (e.g., L’Aquila event) using empirical data and surveys with experts (Updated version: 22 February 2012). Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain (SYNER-G) Project

  • Polese M, Verderame GM, Mariniello C, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2008) Vulnerability analysis for gravity load designed RC buildings in Naples-Italy. J Earthq Eng 12(S2):234–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Regio Decreto Legge n. 2229 del 16/11/1939. Norme per la esecuzione delle opere in conglomerate cementizio semplice od armato. G.U. n. 92 del 18/04/1940 (in Italian)

  • Ricci P (2010) Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

  • Ricci P, De Luca F, Verderame GM (2010) 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2005) A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct 7(3):397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianidis KC (1985) Experimental investigation of the behaviour of the single-story infilled R.C. frames under cyclic quasi-static horizontal loading (parametric analysis). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2006) Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9):1097–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verderame GM, Manfredi G, Frunzio G (2001) Le proprietà meccaniche dei calcestruzzi impiegati nelle strutture in cemento armato realizzate negli anni ’60. Atti del X congresso nazionale ANIDIS “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Potenza-Matera, Italy, September 9–13 (in Italian)

  • Verderame GM, Ricci P, Esposito M, Manfredi G (2012) STIL v1.0–Software per la caratterizzazione delle proprietà meccaniche degli acciai da c.a. tra il 1950 e il 2000, available at http://www.reluis.it/

  • Verderame GM, De Luca F, Ricci P, Manfredi G (2010a) Preliminary analysis of a soft storey mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct 40(8):925–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verderame GM, Polese M, Mariniello C, Manfredi G (2010b) A simulated design procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Adv Eng Softw 41(2):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verderame GM, Ricci P, Manfredi G, Cosenza E (2010c) Ultimate chord rotation of RC columns with smooth bars: some considerations about EC8 prescriptions. Bull Earthq Eng 8(6):1351–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1994) Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23(5):507–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorechovsky M, Novak D (2009) Correlation control in small-sample Monte Carlo type simulations I: a simulated annealing approach. Probab Eng Mech 24(3):452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was developed under the financial support of ReLUIS-DPC 2010–2013. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 , Naples, Italy

    Paolo Ricci, Maria Teresa De Risi, Gerardo Mario Verderame & Gaetano Manfredi

Authors
  1. Paolo Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Teresa De Risi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gerardo Mario Verderame
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gaetano Manfredi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Teresa De Risi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricci, P., De Risi, M.T., Verderame, G.M. et al. Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1585–1616 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9453-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9453-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation