Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Eastern Marmara Region

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the seismic hazard in Eastern Marmara Region using an improved probabilistic seismic hazard assessment methodology. Two significant improvements over the previous seismic hazard assessment practices are accomplished in this study: advanced seismic source characterization models in terms of source geometry and recurrence relationships are developed, and improved global ground motion models (NGA-W1 models) are employed to represent the ground motion variability. Planar fault segments are defined and a composite magnitude distribution model is used for all seismic sources in the region to properly represent the characteristic behavior of the North Anatolian Fault without the need for an additional background zone. Multi-segment ruptures are considered using the rupture model proposed by the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003). Events in the earthquake catalogue are attributed to the fault zones and scenario weights are determined by releasing the accumulated seismic energy. The uniform hazard spectra at 10 % probability of exceedance in 50 years hazard level for different soil conditions (soil and rock) are revealed for specific locations in the region (Adapazarı, Düzce, Gemlik, Izmit, Iznik and Sapanca). Hazard maps of the region for rock site conditions at the selected hazard levels are provided to allow the readers perform site-specific hazard assessment and develop site-specific design spectrum for local site conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson and Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Cagnan Z (2010) A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models. Bull Seism Soc Am 100:2978–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyüz S, Hartleb RD, Barka AA, Altunel E, Sunal G, Meyer B, Armijo R (2002) Surface rupture and slip distribution of the 12 November 1999 Duzce earthquake (M7.1), North Anatolian Fault, Bolu, Turkey. Bull Seism Soc Am 92(1):61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atakan K, Ojeda A, Meghraoui M, Barka A, Erdik M, Bodare A (2002) Seismic Hazard in Istanbul following the 17 August 1999 Izmit and 12 November 1999 Düzce earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:466–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayhan ME, Bürgmann R, McClusky S, Lenk O, Aktug B, Herece E, Reilinger RE (2001) Kinematics of the Mw=7.2, 12 (November 1999) Düzce. Turkey earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 28(2):367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA (1996) Slip distribution along the North Anatolian fault associated with large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967. Bull Seism Soc Am 86:1238–1254

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA, Akyüz S, Altunel E et al (2002) The surface rupture and slip distribution of the August 17, 1999 Izmit earthquake, \(\text{ M }\_7.4\), North Anatolian fault. Bull Seism Soc Am 92(1):43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seism Soc Am 89:501–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F, Abrahamson NA (2005) On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:377–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24:99–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seism Res Lett 68(1):128–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambazoglu S (2012) Preparation of a source model for the Eastern Marmara Region along the North Anatolian fault segments and probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Düzce Province. Middle East Technical University, MS Thesis Dissertation

  • Cambazoglu S, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2012) Preparation of a line source model for probabilistic seismic hazard analyses of Düzce Province, Turkey. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper# 3472, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seism Res Lett 68:154–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5 % damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24:139–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) Chiou-Youngs NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. Earthq Spectra 24:173–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 58:1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Bommer JJ (2006) Modeling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure. Bull Earthq Eng 4:249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth WL, Matthews MV, Nadeau RM, Nishenko SP, Reasenberg PA, Simpson RW (1999) A physically-based earthquake recurrence model for estimation of long-term earthquake. Workshop on earthquake recurrence. State of the art and directions for the future, Istituto Nazionale de Geofisica, Rome, Italy, pp 22–25

  • Erdik M, Doyuran V, Akkas N, Gulkan PA (1985) Probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117:295–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Demircioğlu M, Şeşetyan K, Durukal E, Siyahi B (2004) Earthquake hazard in Marmara region, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:605–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülkan P, Koçyiğit A, Yücemen MS, Doyuran V, Başöz N (1993) A seismic zones map of Turkey derived from recent data. Middle East Technical University Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. 93–01 (in Turkish)

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment-magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (2008) An NGA empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 24:217–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, Califorina Earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 71(6):2011–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan E, Gülkan P (2004) Site-dependent spectra derived from ground motion records in Turkey. Earthq Spectra 20(4):1111–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan E, Gülkan P, Yilmaz N, Çelebi M (2009) Reassessment of probabilistic seismic hazard in the Marmara Region. Bull Seism Soc Am 99(4):2127–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research institute (2007) A revised and extended earthquake catalogue for Turkey since 1900 (M 4.0)

  • Langridge RM, Stenner HD, Fumal TE, Christofferson SA, Rockwell TK, Hartleb RD, Bachhuber J, Barka AA (2002) Geometry, slip distribution, and kinematics of surface rupture on the Sakarya fault segment during the 17 August 1999 Izmit, Turkey. Bull Seism Soc Am 92(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClusky S et al (2000) Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105:5695–5719

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (2004) Seismic hazard and risk analysis. EERI Monograph MNO-10. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocak S (2011) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Eastern Marmara and evaluation of Turkish earthquake code requirements. Middle East Technical University, MS Thesis Dissertation

  • Özbey C, Sari A, Manuel L, Erdik M, Fahjan Y (2004) An empirical attenuation relationship for Northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Gas & Electric Company (2010) Verification of PSHA code Haz39. GEO.DCPP.10.03 Rev 0

  • Pucci S, Pantosti D, De Martini PM (2009) Earthquake recurrence of the Düzce Fault (North Anatolian Fault Zone): integrating geomorphological and paleoseismological analyses. In: Guarnieri P (ed) Recent progress on Earthquake Geology. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, p 257

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilinger RE et al (2000) Coseismic and postseismic fault slip for the 17 August 1999, M = 7.5, Izmit, Turkey Earthquake. Science 289(5484):1519–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadigh CY, Chang J, Egan A, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Bull Seism Soc Am 68:180–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroğlu F, Emre O, Kuscu I (1992) Active fault map of Turkey. Miner Res Explor Inst, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RS, Barka AA, Dieterich JH (1997) Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys J Int 128:594–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Earhquake Code (2007) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara

  • Weichert DH (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(4):1337–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003) Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002–2031, U.S. Geological Society Open File, Report 03–214

  • Yılmaz-Öztürk N (2008) Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: a sensitivity study with respect to different models. Middle East Technical University, PhD Dissertation

  • Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1985) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(4):939–964

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by METU: “Seismic Source Modeling and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Marmara Sea and Adapazarı Region” (BAP Award Number: BAP-03-03-2009-01). We are thankful to Prof. Dr. Yener Özkan for his support. The authors wish to acknowledge Prof. Dr. Haluk Akgün, Dr. Mustafa Koçkar, and Selim Cambazoglu for their contribution on seismic source models of the region. We appreciate the help and support of Norman A. Abrahamson and Nick Gregor regarding the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment calculations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeynep Gülerce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gülerce, Z., Ocak, S. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Eastern Marmara Region. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1259–1277 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9443-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9443-6

Keywords

Navigation