Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On soil-structure interaction in large non-slender partially buried structures

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the seismic analysis of a deeply embedded non-slender structure hosting the pumping unit of a reservoir. The dynamic response in this type of problems is usually studied under the assumption of a perfectly rigid structure using a sub-structuring procedure (three-step solution) proposed specifically for this hypothesis. Such an approach enables a relatively simple assessment of the importance of some key factors influencing the structural response. In this work, the problem is also solved in a single step using a direct approach in which the structure and surrounding soil are modelled as a coupled system with its actual geometry and flexibility. Results indicate that, quite surprisingly, there are significant differences among prediction using both methods. Furthermore, neglecting the flexibility of the structure leads to a significant underestimation of the spectral accelerations at certain points of the structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez Rubio S, Benito JJ, Sánchez-Sesma FJ, Alarcón E (2005) The use of direct boundary element method for gaining insight into complex seismic response. Comput Struct 83:821–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez J (1993) Boundary elements in dynamics. Computational Mechanics Publication: Southampton and Elsevier Applied Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsabee F, Morray JP, Roesset JM (1977) Dynamic behavior of embedded foundations. Rep. No. R77–33, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Gasparini DA (1976) SIMQKE: a program for artificial generation. Rep. No. R76–4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings PC, Housner GW, Tsai NC (1968) Simulated earthquake motions. Caeltech

  • Kausel E, Roesset JM (1974) Soil-structure interaction problems for nuclear containment structures. In: Electronic power and civil engineer conf paper power div specially conf, Boulder, Colorado, pp 469–498

  • Kausel E, Whitman RV, Morray JP, Elsabee F (1978) The spring method for embedded foundations. Nucl Eng Des 48:377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kausel E (2010) Early history of soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 30(9):822–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeso O, Aznárez JJ, Domínguez J (2002) Effects of space distribution of excitation on seismic response of arch dams. J Eng Mech ASCE 128(7):759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeso O, Aznárez JJ, Domínguez J (2004) Three-dimensional models of reservoir sediment and effects on the seismic response of arch dams. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33:1103–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeso O, Aznárez JJ, García F (2005) Dynamic impedances of piles and groups of piles in saturated soils. Comput Struct 83:769–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylonakis G (2001) Elastodynamic model for large-diameter end-bearing shafts. Soil Found 41(3):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylonakis G, Nikolaou S, Gazetas G (2006) Footings under seismic loading: analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 26:824–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesset JM (1977) Chapter 19: soil amplification of earthquakes. In: Desai CS, Christian JT (eds) Numerical methods in geotechnical engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh M, Watanabe H (2004) Effects of flexibility on rocking impedance of deeply embedded foundation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(4):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabel B, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE: a computer program for analysis of horizontally layered sites. Rep. No. EERC/72-12, University of California, Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report No 70–1. EERC

  • Varun D, Assimaki D, Gazetas G (2009) A simplified model for lateral response of large diameter caisson foundations: linear elastic formulation. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 29(2):268–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaverde R (2009) Fundamental concepts of earthquake engineering. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Baton Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil-structure interaction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Subdirección General de Proyectos de Investigación of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain and FEDER through research project BIA2010-21399-C02-01 and also by the Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información (ACIISI) of the Government of the Canary Islands and FEDER through research project ProID20100224. A. Santana is recipient of the FPI research fellowship BES-2009-029161 from the MINECO. The authors would like to thank the engineer Mr. Elías Fernández who, by describing the problem as well as his concerns on the applicability of the current methods to solve it, motivated the research presented in the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Modelado en Ingeniería Mecánica (CEMIM-F2I2), Madrid, 28006, Spain

    J. Vega

  2. Instituto Universitario de Sistemas Inteligentes y Aplicaciones Numéricas en Ingeniería (SIANI), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017, Spain

    J. J. Aznárez, A. Santana, L. A. Padrón, J. J. Pérez & O. Maeso

  3. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28006, Spain

    E. Alarcón

Authors
  1. J. Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. J. Aznárez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Santana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Alarcón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. A. Padrón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. J. Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. O. Maeso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Maeso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vega, J., Aznárez, J.J., Santana, A. et al. On soil-structure interaction in large non-slender partially buried structures. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1403–1421 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9433-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9433-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation