Skip to main content
Log in

Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past seismic events, including the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake and the 2012 Emilia earthquake, clearly demonstrated the inadequacy of the current design approach for the connection system of the cladding wall panels of precast buildings. To clarify this problem the present paper investigates the seismic behaviour of a traditional precast structural frame for industrial buildings with a new type of connection system of cladding panels. This system consists of a statically determined pendulum arrangement of panels, each supported with two hinges to the structure, one at the top and one at the bottom, so to have under seismic action a pure frame behaviour where the wall panels are masses without stiffness. Adding mutual connections between the panels, the wall cladding panels become part of the resisting structure, leading to a dual frame/wall system or to a wall system depending on the stiffness of the connections. The seismic behaviour of this structural assembly is investigated for different degrees of interaction between frame and panels, as well as for an enhanced solution with dissipative connections. The results of nonlinear static (pushover) analyses and nonlinear dynamic analyses under recorded and artificial earthquakes highlight the role of the wall panel connections on the seismic behaviour of the structural assembly and show the effectiveness of the dual frame/wall system with dissipative connections between panels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biondini F, Toniolo G (2009) Probabilistic calibration and experimental validation of seismic design criteria for one storey concrete frames. J Earthq Eng 13:426–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Toniolo G (2010) Experimental research on behaviour of precast structures. L’Industria Italiana del Cemento 854:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2012a) Seismic behaviour of precast buildings with cladding panels. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, Sept 24–28, 2012

  • Biondini F, Titi A, Toniolo G (2012b) Pseudodynamic tests and numerical simulation on a full scale prototype of a multi-storey precast structure. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, Sept 24–28, 2012

  • CEN-EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • CEN-EN 1993-1-8 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1–8: Design of joints. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • CEN-EN 1090-2 (2008) Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures—part 2: technical requirements for steel structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

  • Colombo A, Toniolo G (2012a) Precast concrete structures: the lesson learnt from L’Aquila earthquake. Struct Concr J FIB 13(2):71–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo A, Toniolo G (2012b) Problems of seismic design of the cladding panels of precast buildings. In: New Zealand society for earthquake engineering (NZSEE) annual conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, Apr 13–15, 2012

  • Craig J, Goodno B, Pinelli J, Moor C (1992) Modeling and evaluation of ductile cladding connection systems for seismic response attenuation in buildings. In: 10th World conference on earthquake engineering (10WCEE), vol 7, pp 4183–4188, Madrid, Spain, July 19–24, 1992

  • Ferrara L, Felicetti R, Toniolo G, Zenti C (2011) Friction dissipative devices for cladding panels in precast buildings. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 15(9):1319–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry RM, Roll F (1986) Cladding-frame interaction. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(4):815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal A, Pampanin S, Buchanan A, Palermo A (2007) Improved seismic performance of LVL post-tensioned walls coupled with UFP devices. In: 8th Pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Singapore, Dec 5–7, 2007

  • Menegotto M (2009) Observations on precast concrete structures of industrial buildings and warehouses. Progettazione sismica 3:149–153 (Special issue on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake)

    Google Scholar 

  • Negro P, Bournas DA, Molina FJ (2012) Pseudodynamic testing of the SAFECAST three-storey precast building. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, Sept 24–28, 2012

  • NIST GCR, 96–681 (1995) Literature review on seismic performance of building cladding systems. National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Department of Commerce, USA

  • Palsson H, Goodno BJ, Graig JI, Will KM (1984) Cladding influence on dynamics response of tall buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 12(2):215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelli J-P, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (1995) Energy-based seismic design of ductile cladding systems. J Struct Eng 121(3):567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Sritharan S, Conley JR, Pampanin S (1999) Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building. PCI J 44(6):42–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz AE, Magana RA, Trados MK, Huo X (1994) Experimental study of joint connections in precast concrete walls. In: 5th U.S. National conference on earthquake engineering, Chicago, IL, USA, July 10–14, 1994

  • Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. J Struct Div ASCE 96(12):2557–2573

    Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo G (2012) SAFECAST project: European research on seismic behaviour of the connections of precast structures. In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, Sept 24–28, 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been developed within the scope of the EU Seventh Framework Programme FP7-SME-2012: SAFECLADDING—Improved Fastening Systems of Cladding Wall Panels of Precast Buildings in Seismic Zones, Grant agreement No. 314122, 2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Biondini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biondini, F., Dal Lago, B. & Toniolo, G. Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1061–1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9418-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9418-z

Keywords

Navigation