Skip to main content
Log in

A knowledge-based software for the preliminary design of seismically isolated bridges

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic design of isolated bridges involves conceptual, preliminary and detailed structural design. However, despite the variety of commercial software currently available for the analysis and design of such systems, conceptual and preliminary design can prove to be a non-straightforward procedure because of the sensitivity of bridge response on the initial decisions made by the designer of the location, number and characteristics of the bearings placed, as well as on a series of broader criteria such as serviceability, target performance level and cost-effectiveness of the various design alternatives. Given the lack of detailed design guidelines to ensure, at this preliminary stage, compliance with the above requirements, a “trial and error” procedure is typically followed in the design office to decide on the most appropriate design scheme in the number and location of the bearing systems; the latter typically based on engineering judgment to balance performance with cost. To this end, the particular research effort aims to develop a decision-making system for the optimal preliminary design of seismically isolated bridges, assumed to respond as single degree of freedom (SDOF) systems. The proposed decision-making process is based on the current design provisions of Eurocode 8, but is complemented by additional criteria set according to expert judgment, laboratory testing and recent research findings, while using a combined cost/performance criterion to select from a database of bearings available on the international market. Software is also developed for the implementation of the system. The paper concludes with the application, and essentially the validation of the methodology and software developed through more rigorous MDOF numerical analysis for the case of a real bridge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (2001) Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. Based on: NCHRP 12-49, Comprehensive Specification for the Seismic Design of Bridges, Revised LRFD Design Specifications, (Seismic Provisions), Third draft of specifications and commentary; March 2001

  • Abe M, Yoshida J, Fujino Y (2004) Multi-axial behaviors of laminated rubber bearings and their modeling. I: Experimental study. ASCE J Struct Eng 130(8): 1119–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AISI, American Iron and Steel Institute (2005) Steel bridge bearing selection and design guide, vol II, Chap. 4, Highway Structures Design Handbook

  • Aparicio AC, Casas JR, Ramos G (1996) Computer aided design of prestressed concrete highway bridges. Comput Struct 60(6): 957–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arockiasamy M, Sivakumar M (2005) Design implications of creep and shrinkage in integral abutment bridges. ACI Spec Publ 227(5): 85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Standard (1981) AS 1523-1981. Elastomeric bearings for use in structures

  • Biswas M, Welch JG (1987) BDES: a bridge design expert system. Eng Comput 2(3): 125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM, Pavese A (1998) Optimal design of isolated bridges and isolation systems for existing bridges. In: Proceedings of U.S.-Italy workshop on seismic protective systems for bridges. MCEER, pp 407–429

  • Computers and Structures INC (2002) SAP 2000. Nonlinear Ver. 11.0.4. User’s Reference Manual, Berkeley, California

  • Dicleli M, Albhaisi SM (2004) Estimation of length limits for integral bridges built on clay. ASCE J Bridge Eng 9(6): 572–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicleli M, Mansour MY, Constantinou MC (2005) Efficiency of seismic isolation for seismic retrofitting of heavy substructured bridges. ASCE J Bridge Eng 10(4): 429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Marnetto R (1998) SMA devices for seismic isolation of bridges: design and experimental behavior. In: Proceedings of U.S.-Italy workshop on seismic protective systems for bridges. MCEER, pp 313–333

  • EN 1337-3 (2005) (European Standard): Structural bearings-Part 3: Elastomeric bearings. European Committee for Standardization

  • EN 15129: Anti-seismic devices. European Committee for Standardization; 2009

  • Eurocode 1 (2003) Basis of design and actions on structures-Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. European Committee for Standardization

  • Eurocode 8 (2004a) Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, DRAFT No 3. European Committee for Standardization

  • Eurocode 8 (2004b) Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 2: Bridges, DRAFT No 3. European Committee for Standardization; 2004

  • Faravelli L (2001) Modelling the response of an elastomeric base isolator. J Struct Control 8(1): 17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavaise E, Papaefthimiou K, Tzaveas T, Stylianidis K, Tegos J (2005) The problem of minimum cost for structural members of earthquake resistant bridges. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference of earthquake resistant engineering structures, Skiathos

  • Hamzeh O, Tassoulas JT, Becker EB (1995) Analysis of elastomeric bridge bearings. Report No. 1304-5, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin; August 139

  • Hawk H (2003) NCHRP 483. Bridge life-cycle cost analysis. Washington, DC

  • Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering (IRICE) (2006) PUNE 411001, Bridge Bearings

  • International Standard ISO 22762-1 (2005) Elastomeric seismic protection isolators-Part 1: Test Methods. International Organization for Standardization

  • Jain SK, Thakkar SK (2005) Experimental investigations on laminated rubber bearings. Technical Note. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1): 129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappos A, Moschonas J (2006) Documented classification of bridges in Greece. Technical Report, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Kawashima K (2004) Seismic isolation of highway bridges. J Jpn Assoc Earthq Eng (Special Issue) 4(3): 283–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JM, Buckle IG, Koh CG (1986) Mechanical characteristics of base isolation bearings for a bridge deck model test. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California. Rep. No.UCB/EERC-86/11

  • Kelly JM (1986) Aseismic base isolation: a review and bibliography. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 5(4): 202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JM (1997) Earthquake resistant design with rubber. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidis D, Maravas A (2003) Egnatia Motorway concrete bridges statistics. In: Proceedings of 31st ASECAP study and information days, Portoroz, Slovenia, pp 92–109

  • Kunde MC, Jangid RS (2003) Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Electron J Struct Eng 3: 140–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahin SA (1993) A simplified preliminary design approach for base isolated bridges. In: Proceeidngs of 2nd U.S.–Japan workshop on earthquake protective systems for bridges, Japan, pp 311–320

  • Manos G, Mitoulis S, Kourtidis V, Sextos A, Tegos I (2007) Study of the behavior of steel laminated rubber bearings under prescribed loads. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on seismic isolation, energy dissipation and active vibrations control of structures, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Manos G, Sextos A, Mitoulis S, Kourtidis V, Geraki M (2008) Tests and improvements of bridge elastomeric bearings and software development for their preliminary design. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  • Miles JC, Moore CJ (1991) An expert system for the conceptual design of bridges. Comput Struct 40(1): 101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitoulis SA, Tegos IA, Stylianidis K-C (2010) Cost-effectiveness related to the earthquake resisting system of multi-span bridges. Eng Struct 32(9): 2658–2671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon B-Y, Kang G-J, Kang BS, Kelly J (2002) Design and manufacturing of fiber reinforced elastomeric isolator for seismic isolation. J Mater Process Technol 130–131: 145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore CJ, Miles JC (1997) Decision support for conceptual bridge design. Artif Intell Eng 11(3): 259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F, Kelly JM (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures, From theory to practice. Wiley, London

  • Nagarajaiah S, Reinhorn A, Constantinou M (1991) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D-base-isolated structures. ASCE J Struct Eng 117(7): 2035–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panetsos P, Konstantidis K (2003) Use of seismic isolation and energy dissipation systems in Egnatia Highway Bridges. In: Proceedings of 8th world seminar on seismic isolation, energy dissipation and active vibration control of structures, Yerevan, Armenia

  • PCI (2008) Precast, prestressed concrete bridges, the high performance solution, Comprehensive Bridge Design Manual, Accessed online: 1 Dec 2008 (Available via DIALOG. ww.pci.org/publications/bridge)

  • Pham DT, Pham PTN (1998) Expert systems in mechanical and manufacturing engineering. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 3(3): 3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pracasa RAVNS (1992) BEAS: expert system for the preliminary design of bearings. Technical Note. Adv Eng Softw 14(2): 163–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y (1996) Artificial intelligence in bridge engineering. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 11(6): 433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard H, Fenves J (2000) A representation for conceptual design of buildings. ASCE J Comput Civil Eng 14(3): 151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussis PC, Constantinou MC, Erdik M, Durukal E, Dicleli M (2003) Assessment of performance of seismic isolation system of Bolu Viaduct. ASCE J Bridge Eng 8(4): 182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan KL, Kelly JM, Chopra AK (2004) Experimental observation of axial load effects in isolation bearings. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada; August; No. 1707

  • Seidl G, Weizenegger M (2006) Frame structures in bridge construction. Design, analysis and economic considerations. In: Proceedings of international workshop on the bridges with integral abutments. Topics of relevance for the INTAB project, Technical Report, 14

  • Sextos AG, Kappos AJ, Stylianidis K (2008) Computer-aided pre- and post-earthquake assessment of buildings involving database compilation, GIS visualization, and mobile data transmission. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 23(1): 59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umaretiya JR, Joshi SP (1992) An insight into the expert-seisd: a knowledge based system for structural design. Eng Comput 8(3): 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yura J, Kumar A, Yakut A, Topkaya C, Becker E, Collingwood J (2001) Elastomeric bridge bearings: recommended test methods. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 449

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stergios A. Mitoulis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manos, G.C., Mitoulis, S.A. & Sextos, A.G. A knowledge-based software for the preliminary design of seismically isolated bridges. Bull Earthquake Eng 10, 1029–1047 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9320-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9320-0

Keywords

Navigation