Abstract
This paper is an explanation of how earthquakes have been interpreted by our predecessors since written records began. Before that we can only surmise that different societies had deities associated with mythological creatures able to cause earthquakes on one pretext or another. Here I have used the Japanese catfish—or ‘namazu’—creature to a large extent, partly because it is well-documented, but also because it is still used as a metaphor for earthquakes in official Japanese disaster prevention activities. Both the Bible and the Koran explain that earthquakes are God’s punishment for committed sin, and this idea was used until the seventeenth century, particularly by the Christian Church, in explaining their occurrence. The earliest rational approach appears to have come from the founding of Scientific Societies in Europe, beginning in Naples in 1560 and followed quickly by others in many European capital cities including London, where the Royal Society, founded in 1660, had the almost unique benefit of knowledge about earthquakes brought to London by its trade with many parts of the known world. Its Fellows had an opportunity to develop a more balanced approach, producing ideas which often centred on subterranean fire in the earth. Even so, the notion that God was the immediate cause had not disappeared. The 1755 the Great Lisbon earthquake was a seismic event in the religious and philosophical explanation of its cause. European philosophers, led by Leibnitz and Voltaire held contrary views about God and the world, with the latter concluding that earthquakes were caused by natural events with an unknown cause, about which the sins of the people had no influence. Rousseau was another philosopher of influence, initiating the concept of risk, arguing that it was the actions of people which turned an event into a disaster. These philosophers had the benefit of scientific knowledge about the world, originating with Copernicus and subsequently developed by those Scientific Societies referred to above which were created as early as the sixteenth century.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali AY (1946) The Holy Koran. Translation and commentary. Islamic Propogation Centre International
Dawood NJ (1990) The Koran Penguin Classics, ISBN 0-14-044558-7
Dawson C (1912) The origin of earthquakes. Cambridge University Press
de Voltaire FMA (1911) Poem on the Lisbon earthquake or an examination of the axiom ‘All is Well’ (trans: McCabe J). Watts hand Co, London
Hartwig G (1887) Volcanoes and earthquakes. Longmans Green and Co, London
Kant I (1756) History and physiography of the most remarkable cases of the earthquake which towards the end of the year 1755 shook a great part Of the earth (Essay One 1756, 18 pages)
Kovach RL (2004) Early earthquakes of the Americas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ISBN 0-521-82489-3
Lord R (1877) Theory of sound (2 vols). Macmillan and Co, London
Love AEH (1911) Some problems in geodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ludwin RJ, Smits GJ (2007) Folklore and earthquakes: native American oral tradition from Cascadia compared with written folklore from Japan. In: Piccardi L, Masse WB (eds) Myths and geology. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 273, pp 67–94
Mason H (1992) Candide: optimism demolished. Twayne Masterwork studies, New York ISBN 08057-8085-8
Muir-Wood R (1988) Robert Mallet and John Milne-earthquakes incorporated in Great Britain. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 17(1): 107–142
Peacock RA (1877) Part of the Eyles Collection, Cause of activity in earthquakes and volcanoes
Pearson R (2008) Candide and other stories. English translation. Oxford World Classics, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Publication by the Tokyo Fire Dept. (2010) http://www.tfd.metro.tokyo.jp/hp-fucyu/annzenn/tiiki.jisinn.html
Reeves RK The Lisbon eArthquake of 1755 : confrontation between the church and the enlightenment in eighteenth century Portugal. Doctoral thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Available online at http://nisee.berkekey.edu/documents/elib/www/documents/2005/reeves-thesis.pdf
The Eyles Collection (1660–1890) Special collection section of the arts and social sciences library, University of Bristol, UK
Timoshenko SP (1953) History of strength of materials. Mcgraw Hill, New York
Vaz FAL (2005) Earthquakes and the coming of an age of scientific attitude in Portugal. In: Conference to mark the 250th anniversary of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. LNEC, Lisbon, pp 1–4
Wesley C (1750) The cause and cure for earthquakes. Sermon 120, http://gbgm-unic.org/umhistory/wesley/serm-129.stm
Wesley J (1750) Hymns occasioned by the earthquake, 8 March 1750. To which are added a hymn for the English in America, and another for the year 1756. Part 2, 2nd edn. Printed by E. Farly (quoted in Tokyo Fire Dept.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Severn, R.T. Understanding earthquakes: from myth to science. Bull Earthquake Eng 10, 351–366 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9312-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9312-0