Skip to main content
Log in

Istanbul geotechnical downhole arrays

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geotechnical downhole arrays that record seismic ground response in near-surface layers are increasingly becoming one of the best sources of information for developing, verifying, and calibrating engineering analyses and design methods. Recently, three geotechnical downhole arrays have been installed in the European side of Istanbul, Turkey with efforts of Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI). The existing high seismic activity of the region increases the scientific importance of these downhole arrays. Each array is composed of one accelerometer on the ground surface and three or four borehole accelerometers at various depths along the soil profile with the deepest sensor located at the engineering bedrock level (Vs > 750 m/s). The arrays also provide reference bedrock motion for Rapid Response Network composed of 55 surface instruments operated by KOERI in the west European side of city. An important aspect of this paper is to introduce the recently-completed test sites emphasizing on their potential to generate valuable data for scientific community. Preliminary analysis of the recorded data provides evidence for significant site amplification of ground motion by the surface layers. Comparisons between the recorded and modeled response indicate that Vs 30 alone is a poor indicator of the amplification potential emphasizing the importance of site-specific analyses in predicting the ground response as opposed to empirical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aguirre J, Irikura K (1997) Nonlinearity, liquefaction, and velocity variations of soft soil layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 87: 1244–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A, Kurtuluş A, Tönük G (2010a) Seismic microzonation and earthquake damage scenarios for urban areas. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30: 1319–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A, Tönük G, Kurtuluş A, Erdik M, Parolai S (2010b) Modeling the observed site response from Istanbul strong motion network. In: Fifth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, CA, May 24–29

  • Beresnev IA, Field EH, Johnson PA, den Abeele KE-A (1998) Magnitude of nonlinear sediment response in Los Angeles basin during the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 88: 1079–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectr 10(4): 617–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Fahjan Y, Özel O, Alcik H, Mert A, Gül M (2003) Istanbul earthquake rapid response and the early warning system. Bull Earthq Eng 1(1): 157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field EH, Zeng Y, Johnson PA, Beresnev IA (1998) Pervasive nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake: observations and finite-source simulations. J Geophys Res 103: 26,869–26,883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima Y, Irikura K, Uateke T, Matsumoto H (2000) Characteristics of observed peak amplitude for strong ground motion from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 90: 545–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Sun JI (1992) Shake91, A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, modified based on the original SHAKE program by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed, 1972

  • Kurtuluş A, Şafak E, Strollo A, Parolai S, Ansal A (2008) Sensor azimuth determination at a seismic vertical array in Istanbul, Turkey. European Seismological Commission ESC 2008, 31st General Assembly, Crete, Greece, 2008

  • NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) (2001) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for new buildings and other structures. 2000 Edition, Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 368), Ch. 4, Washington, D.C

  • OYO (2007) Production of microzonation report and maps —on European Side (south). Final Report to Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality

  • Sato K, Kokusho T, Matsumoto M, Yamada E (1996) Nonlinear seismic response and soil property during 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake. Special Issue on Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken Nambu earthquake. Soils Found 41–52

  • Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI (1998) Nonlinear soil response as a natural passive isolation mechanism—the 1994 northridge, california, earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 17: 41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aslı Kurtuluş.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurtuluş, A. Istanbul geotechnical downhole arrays. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 1443–1461 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9268-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9268-0

Keywords

Navigation