Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 761–781 | Cite as

Seismic response of L’Aquila downtown from comparison between 2D synthetics spectral ratios of SH, P-SV and Rayleigh waves and observations of the 2009 earthquake sequence

  • Paola Bordoni
  • John Haines
  • Giuliano Milana
  • Sandro Marcucci
  • Fabrizio Cara
  • Giuseppe Di Giulio
Original Research Paper

Abstract

This is the first part of a study on the seismic response of the L’Aquila city using 2D simulation and experimental data. We have studied two velocity-depth models with the aim of outlining the behavior of a velocity reversal in the top layer, which is associated with the stiff Brecce de L’Aquila unit (BrA). In this setting, the SMTH model is topped by a layer with about 2:1 impedance contrast with the underlying layer while the NORV model has no velocity reversal. We have simulated the propagation of SH and P-SV wavefields in the range 0–10 Hz for incidence 0°–90°. Earthquake spectral ratios of the horizontal and vertical components at six sites in L’Aquila downtown are compared to corresponding synthetics spectral ratios. The vertical component of P-SV synthetics enables us to investigate a remarkable amplification effect seen in the vertical component of the recorded strong motion. Sites AQ04 and AQ05 are best matched by synthetics from the NORV model while FAQ5 and AQ06 have a better match with synthetics spectral ratios from the SMTH model. All simulations show this behavior systematically, with horizontal and near-horizontal incident waves predicting the overall pattern of matches more clearly than vertical and near-vertical incidence. The model inferences are in agreement with new geological data reporting lateral passages in the top layer from the stiff BrA to softer sediments. Matches are good in terms of frequency of the first amplification peak and of spectral amplitude: the horizontal components have spectral ratio peaks predominantly at 0.5 Hz in the simulations and at 0.7 Hz in the data, both with amplitudes of 4, while the vertical component spectral ratios reach values of 6 at frequencies of about 1 Hz in both data and simulations. The vertical component spectral ratios are very well matched using Rayleigh waves with incidence at 90°. The NORV model without the velocity reversal predicts spectral ratio peaks for the horizontal components at frequencies up to 6 Hz. The reversal of velocity acts as a low-pass frequency filter on the horizontal components reducing the amplification effect of the sediment filled valley.

Keywords

Site response 2D synthetic seismograms SH P-SV Rayleigh waves Horizontal and vertical component amplification Velocity reversal Spectral ratios Comparison with data L’Aquila 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amoroso S, Del Monaco F, Di Eusebio F, Monaco P, Taddei B, Tallini M, Totani F, Totani G (2010) Campagna di indagini geologiche, geotecniche e geofisiche per lo studio della risposta sismica locale della città dell’Aquila: la stratigrafia dei sondaggi (Giugno - Agosto 2010). Report CERFIS n. 1, http://www.cerfis.it/en/download/cat_view/67-pubblicazioni-cerfis/68-reports
  2. Anzidei M, Boschi E, Cannelli V, Devoti R, Esposito A, Galvani A, Melini D, Pietrantonio G, Riguzzi F, Sepe V, Serpelloni E (2009) Coseismic deformation of the destructive April 6, 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (central Italy) from GPS data. Geophys Res Let. doi:10.1029/2009GL039145
  3. Atzori S, Hunstad S, Chini M, Salvi S, Tolomei C, Bignami C, Stramondo S, Trasatti E, Antonioli A, Boschi E (2009) Finite fault inversion of DInSAR coseismic displacement of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (central Italy). Geophys Res Let. doi:10.1029/2009GL039293
  4. Blumetti AM, Di Filippo M, Zaffiro P, Marsan P, Toro B (2002) Seismic hazard of the city of L’Aquila (Abruzzo-Central Italy): new data from geological, morphotectonic and gravity prospecting analysis. Stud Geol Camerti 1: 7–18Google Scholar
  5. Bordoni P, Di Giulio G, Haines AJ, Milana G, Rovelli A (2010) Issues in choosing the references to use for spectral ratios from observations and modeling at Cavola Landslide in Northern Italy. Bull Seism Soc Am. doi:10.1785/0120090116
  6. Chiarabba C et al (2009) The 2009 L’Aquila (central Italy) Mw6.3 earthquake: main shock and aftershocks. Geophys Res Lett 36:L18308. doi:10.1029/2009GL039627
  7. Cirella A, Piatanesi A, Cocco M, Tinti E, Scognamiglio L, Michelini A, Lomax A, Boschi E (2009) Rupture history of the 2009 L’Aquila (Italy) earthquake from non-linear joint inversion of strong motion and GPS data. Geophys Res Let. doi:10.1029/2009GL039795
  8. De Luca G, Marcucci S, Milana G, Sano‘ T (2005) Evidence of low frequency amplification in the city of l’Aquila, Central Italy, through a multidisciplinary approach including strong and weak-motion data, ambient noise, and numerical modeling. Bull Seism Soc Am 95(4): 1469–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EMERGEO Working Group: (2009) Evidence for surface rupture associated with the Mw 6.3 L’Aquila earthquake sequence of April 2009 (central Italy). Terra Nova 22: 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galli P, Camassi R (eds) (2009) Rapporto sugli effetti del terremoto aquilano del 6 aprile 2009. DPC-INGV QUEST Team (http://www.mi.ingv.it/eq/090406/quest.html)
  11. Goldstein P, Dodge D, Firpo M, Minner L (2003) SAC2000: signal processing and analysis tools for seismologists and engineers. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) Invited contribution to ‘The IASPEI international handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology’. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruppo di lavoro MS (2008) Indirizzi e criteri per la microzonazione sismica. Conferenza delle regioni e provincie autonome. Dipartimento della protezione civile, Roma, vol 3, e Cd-romGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruppo di lavoro MS_AQ (2010) La Microzonazione Sismica dell’area aquilana. 2 vol + 1 DVDGoogle Scholar
  14. Haines AJ, de Hoop MV (1996) An invariant bedding analysis of general scattering problems. J Math Phys 37: 3854–3881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haines AJ, Hulme T, Yu J (2004) General elastic wave scattering problems using an impedance operator approach—I. Mathematical development. Geophys J Int 159: 643–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme T, Haines AJ, Yu J (2004) General elastic wave scattering problems using an impedance operator approach—II. Two-dimensional isotropic validation and examples. Geophys J Int 159: 658–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennett BLN (1983) Seismic wave propagation in stratified media. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Milana G, Azzara RM, Bergamaschi F, Bertrand E, Bordoni P, Cara F, Cogliano R, Cultrera G, Di Giulio G, Duval AM, Fodarella A, Marcucci S, Pucillo S, Régnier J, Riccio G (2011) The contribution of seismic data in microzonation studies for downtown L’Aquila. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9246-6
  19. Pino NA, Di Luccio F (2009) Source complexity of the 6 April 2009 L’Aquila (central Italy) earthquake and its strongest aftershock revealed by elementary seismological analysis. Geophys Res Let. doi:10.1029/2009GL041331
  20. Stewart JP, Chiou S, Bray JD, Graves RW, Somerville PG, Abrahamson NA (2001) Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Pacific earthquake engineering research center report 2001/09. College of Engineering, University of California, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Tertulliani A, Arcoraci L, Berardi M, Bernardini F, Camassi R, Castellano C, Del Mese S, Ercolani E, Graziani L, Leschiutta I, Rossi A, Vecchi M (2010) An application of EMS98 in a medium-sized city: the case of L’Aquila (Central Italy) after the April 6, 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9188-4

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Bordoni
    • 1
  • John Haines
    • 2
  • Giuliano Milana
    • 3
  • Sandro Marcucci
    • 4
  • Fabrizio Cara
    • 3
  • Giuseppe Di Giulio
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro Nazionale Terremoti, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaRomeItaly
  2. 2.GNS Science, DunedinDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.Roma1, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e VulcanologiaRomeItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento Protezione CivileUfficio Valutazione Prevenzione e Mitigazione del Rischio SismicoRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations