Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-time mapping of earthquake-induced landslides

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rigid sliding block analysis is a common analytical procedure used to predict the potential for earthquake-induced landslides for natural slopes. Currently, predictive models provide the expected level of displacement as a function of the characteristics of the slope (e.g., geometry, strength, yield acceleration) and the characteristics of earthquake shaking (e.g., peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity). These predictive models are used for developing seismic landslide hazard maps which identify zones with risk of earthquake-induced landslides. Alternatively, these models can be combined with Shakemaps to generate “near-real-time” Slidemaps which could be used, among others, as a tool in disaster management. Shakemaps (a publicly available free service of the United States Geological Survey, USGS) provide near-real-time ground motion conditions during the time of an earthquake event. The ground motion parameters provided by a Shakemap are very useful for the development of Slidemaps. By providing ground motion parameters from an actual earthquake event, Shakemaps also serve as a tool to decouple the uncertainty of the ground motion in sliding displacements prediction. Campania region in Italy is studied for assessing the applicability of using Shakemaps for regional landslide-risk assessment. This region is selected based on the availability of soil shear strength parameters and the proximity to the 1980 Irpina (M w  = 6.9) Earthquake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1996) Empirical ground motion models, report prepared for Brookhaven National Laboratory. New York, NY, May, 144 pp

  • AMRA (2008) Personal communication with Eng. Angela Di Ruocco and Eng. Annamaria Criscuolo

  • Blake T, Hollingsworth R, Stewart J, D’Antonio R, Earnest J, Gharib F, Horsman L, Hsu D, Kupferman S, Masuda R, Pradel D, Real C, Reeder W, Sathialingam N, Simantob E (eds) (2002) Recommended procedures for implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 guidelines for analyzing and mitigating landslide hazards in California. ASCE Los Angeles Section Geotechnical Group

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra EERI 24(1): 99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Rathje EM (1998) Earthquake-induced displacements of solid-waste landfills. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(3): 242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Travasarou T (2007) Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133(4): 381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Rathje EM, Augello AJ, Merry SM (1998) Simplified seismic design procedure for lined solid-waste landfills. Geosyn Int 5(1–2): 203–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo F, Wilson RC (2004) Rainfall induced debris flows in pyroclastic deposits, Campania (southern Italy). Eng Geol 75: 263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugen ED, Kaynia AM (2008) A comparative study of empirical models for landslide prediction using case histories. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. Beijin, China, pp 12–17 (Paper 04-02-0022)

  • Hynes-Griffin, Franklin AG (1984) Rationalizing the seismic coefficient method, US army corps of engineers waterways experiment station, miscellaneous paper vol. GL-84-13

  • Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91: 209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson WR, Edwin LH, John AM (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58: 271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuson WF, Franklin AG (1983) Seismic design analysis and remedial measures to improve the stability of existing earth dams. In: Howard TR (eds) Corps of engineers approach, seismic design of Embankments and Caverns, ASCE, New York

  • McCrink TP (2001) Mapping earthquake-induced landslide hazards in Santa Cruz County. In: Ferriz H, Anderson R (eds) Engineering geology practice in northern California: California geological survey Bulletin 210/Association of Engineering Geologists Special Publication 12, pp 77–94

  • Michelini A, Faenza L, Lauciani V, Malagnini L (2008) Shakemap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 79(5): 689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picarelli L, Vinale F (2007) Messa a punto di modelli geotecnici per la simulazione degli effetti al suolo delle precipitazioni, AMRA Center Report. http://www.cmcc.it/pubblicazioni/pubblicazioni/relazioni-tecniche/0011-isc-tr11

  • Rathje EM, Bray JD (1999) An examination of simplified earthquake-induced displacement procedures for earth structures. Can Geotech J 36(1): 72–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Bray JD (2000) Nonlinear coupled seismic sliding analysis of earth structures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126(11): 1002–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Saygili G (2009) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake-induced sliding displacements of natural slopes. Bull New Zealand Soc Earthq Eng 42(1): 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Faraj F, Russell S, Bray JD (2004) Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions. Earthq Spectra 20(1): 119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revellino P, Guadagno FM, Hungr O (2007) Morphological methods and dynamic modelling in landslide hazard assessment of the Campania Appennine carbonate slope. Landsides 5: 59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saygili G, Rathje EM (2008) Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(6): 790–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1979) Considerations in the earthquake-resistant design of earth and rockfill dams. Geotechnique 29: 215–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Blake TF, Hollingsworth RA (2003) A screen analysis procedure for seismic slope stability. Earthq Spectra 19(3): 697–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travasarou T, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA (2003) Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias intensity. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(7): 1133–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2009) United States geological survey http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/shakemap

  • Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson N (2006) Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(5): 477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir M. Kaynia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaynia, A.M., Skurtveit, E. & Saygili, G. Real-time mapping of earthquake-induced landslides. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 955–973 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9234-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9234-2

Keywords

Navigation