Abstract
The influence of noise in strong-motion records is most problematic at low and high frequencies where the signal to noise ratio is commonly low compared to that in the mid-spectrum. The impact of low-frequency noise (<1 Hz) on strong-motion intensity parameters such as ground velocities, displacements and response spectral ordinates can be dramatic and consequentially it has become standard practice to low-cut (high-pass) filter strong-motion data with corner frequencies often chosen based on the shape of Fourier amplitude spectra and the signal-to-noise ratio. It has been shown that response spectral ordinates should not be used beyond some fraction of the corner period (reciprocal of the corner frequency) of the low-cut filter. This article examines the effect of high-frequency noise (>5 Hz) on computed pseudo-absolute response spectral accelerations (PSAs). In contrast to the case of low-frequency noise our analysis shows that filtering to remove high-frequency noise is only necessary in certain situations and that PSAs can often be used up to 100 Hz even if much lower high-cut corner frequencies are required to remove the noise. This apparent contradiction can be explained by the fact that PSAs are often controlled by ground accelerations associated with much lower frequencies than the natural frequency of the oscillator because path and site attenuation (often modelled by Q and κ, respectively) have removed the highest frequencies. We demonstrate that if high-cut filters are to be used, then their corner frequencies should be selected on an individual basis, as has been done in a few recent studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 94–127
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9): 1145–1165
Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4): 371–400
Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1): 1–53. doi:10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0
Anderson JG, Hough SE (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5): 1969–1993
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6): 2181–2205. doi:10.1785/0120050245
Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2010) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA). Bull Earthq Eng doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9130-9 (in press)
Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS (1999) Displacement spectra for seismic design. J Earthq Eng 3(1): 1–32
Boore DM (2001) Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5): 1199–1211
Boore DM (2003a) Analog-to-digital conversion as a source of drifts in displacements derived from digital recordings of ground acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(5): 2017–2024
Boore DM (2003b) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3–4): 635–676. doi:10.1007/PL00012553
Boore DM (2004) Long-period ground motions from digital acceleration recordings: a new era in engineering seismology. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on future directions in instrumentation for strong motion and engineering seismology. Kluwer, Kusadasi, Turkey
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spect 24(1): 99–138. doi:10.1193/1.2830434
Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(2): 93–115
Boore DM, Campbell KW, Atkinson GM (2010) Determination of stress parameters for eight well-recorded earthquakes in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4): 1632–1645. doi:10.1785/0120090328
Bragato PL (2004) Regression analysis with truncated samples and its application to ground-motion attenuation studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4): 1369–1378
Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 154–179
Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W (2008) NGA project strong-motion database. Earthq Spect 24(1): 23–44. doi:10.1193/1.2894831
Converse AM, Brady AG (1992) BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software, version 1.0. Open-File Report 92-296A, US Geological Survey
Danciu L, Tselentis GA (2007) Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1B): 162–183. doi:10.1785/0120040087
Darragh B, Silva W, Gregor N (2004) Strong motion record processing procedures for the PEER center. In: Proceedings of COSMOS workshop on strong-motion record processing. Richmond, California, pp 1–12
Douglas J (2003a) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61(1–2): 43–104
Douglas J (2003b) What is a poor quality strong-motion record?. Bull Earthq Eng 1(1): 141–156
Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(9): 979–993
Idriss IM (2007) Empirical model for estimating the average horizontal values of pseudo-absolute spectral accelerations generated by crustal earthquakes, volume 1 (sites with v s30 = 450 to 900 m/s). Interim report issued for USGS review
Johnson RA (1973) An earthquake spectrum prediction technique. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(4): 1255–1274
Jousset P, Douglas J (2007) Long-period earthquake ground displacements recorded on Guadeloupe (French Antilles). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(7): 949–963. doi:10.1002/eqe.666
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1982) Prediction of earthquake response spectra. Open-File Report 82-977, U.S. Geological Survey
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering & soil dynamics II, geotechnical division, ASCE, pp 43–102
Paolucci R, Rovelli A, Faccioli E, Cauzzi C, Finazzi D, Vanini M, Di Alessandro C, Calderoni G (2008) On the reliability of long period spectral ordinates from digital accelerograms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(5): 697–710
Péquegnat C, Guéguen P, Hatzfeld D, Langlais M (2008) The French Accelerometric Network (RAP) and National Data Centre (RAP-NDC). Seismol Res Lett 79(1): 79–89
Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spect 24(1): 3–21. doi:10.1193/1.2894833
Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia 721
Rupakhety R, Halldorsson B, Sigbjörnsson R (2010) Estimating coseismic deformations from near source strong motion records: methods and case studies. Bull Earthq Eng 8(4): 787–811. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9167-9
Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 337–352
Sadigh K, Chang CY, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 180–189
Sylvander M, Souriau A, Rigo A, Tocheport A, Toutain JP, Ponsolles C, Benahmed S (2008) The 2006 November, M L = 5.0 earthquake near Lourdes (France): new evidence for NS extension across the Pyrenees. Geophys J Int 175(2): 649–664. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03911.x
Trifunac MD (1972) A note on correction of strong-motion accelerograms for instrument response. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(1): 401–409
Trifunac MD (1978) Response spectra of earthquake ground motions. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 104(EM5): 1081–1097
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2007) A performance-based approach to define the site specific earthquake ground motion. Regulatory Guide 1.208
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2008) Interim staff guidance on seismic issues associated with high frequency ground motion in design certification and combined license applications. Interim Staff Guidance DC/COL-ISG1
Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y, Fukushima Y (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3): 898–913. doi:10.1785/0120050122
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Douglas, J., Boore, D.M. High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 395–409 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9208-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9208-4