Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vulnerability index method, in its version developed in the framework of the European project Risk-UE, has been adapted and applied in this article, to evaluate the seismic risk for the city of Barcelona (Spain) through a GIS based tool. According to this method, which defines five damage states, the action is expressed in terms of the macroseismic intensity and the seismic quality of the buildings by means of a vulnerability index. The probabilities of damage states are obtained considering a binomial or beta-equivalent probability distribution. The most relevant seismic risk evaluation results obtained, for current buildings and monuments of Barcelona, are given in the article as scenarios of expected losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anagnos T, Rojahn C, Kiremidjian A (1995) NCEER-ATC joint study on fragility of buildings, Report NCEER-95-0003. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo

  • ATC-13 (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13. Applied Technology Council, Redwook City

  • Barbat AH, Moya FY, Canas JA (1996) Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban zones. Earthq Spectra 12(3): 371–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbat AH, Mena U, Yepez F (1998) Evaluación probabilista del riesgo sísmico en zonas urbanas. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería 14: 247–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N (2006) Performance of buildings under earthquake in Barcelona, Spain. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 21: 573–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbat AH, Lagomarsino S, Pujades LG (2006b) Vulnerability assessment of dwelling buildings. In: Sousa C, Roca A, Goula X (eds) Assessing an managing earthquake risk. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N (2008) Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: application to Barcelona. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10–11): 851–865 (special issue Urban earthquake hazard and damage assessment)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbat AH, Carreño ML, Pujades LG, Lantada N, Cardona OD, Marulanda MC (2009) Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area. Struct Infrastruct Eng. doi:10.1080/15732470802663763

  • Bard PY (1997) Local effects on strong motion ground motion: basic physical phenomena and estimation methods for microzoning studies, In: SERINA: seismic risk and integrated seismological, geotechnical and structural approaches. ITSAK, European Commission, Directorate General for Science and Development

  • Benedetti D, Petrini V (1984) Sulla vulnerabilitá sismica di edifici in muratura: proposte di un metodo di valutazione. L’industria delle Construzioni 149: 66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini A (2000) The vulnerability of buildings—evaluation on a national scale of the seismic vulnerability of ordinary building. CNR-GNDT, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletín Económico de la Construcción (2007) Revista trimestral de precios del ramo de la construcción. Año LXVIII, trimestre 4. No. 272

  • Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40: 137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007) Disaster risk management performance index. Nat Hazards 41: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellò D, Mañà F (2003) Study of the seismic vulnerability of the city of Barcelona within the framework of the Risk-UE European project. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No.EVK4-CT-2000-00014, Barcelona

  • Cid J, Susagna T, Goula X, Chavarria L, Figueras S, Fleta J, Casas A, Roca A (2001) Seismic zonation of Barcelona based on numerical simulation of site effects. Pure Appl Geophys 158: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 59(5): 1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Departament d’Estadistica (2007) La població de Barcelona, 2006. Ajuntament de Barcelona, Barcelona (in catalan)

  • Egozcue JJ, Barbat A, Canas JA, Miquel J, Banda E (1991) A method to estimate intensity occurrence probabilities in low seismic activity regions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20: 43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccioli E (2006) Seismic hazard assessment for derivation of earthquake scenarios in Risk-UE. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA/NIBS (2002) Earthquake loss estimation methodology, HAZUS-99 service release 2 (SR2) technical 533 manual. National Institute of Building Sciences for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 534, Washington, DC

  • Fleta J, Escuer J, Goula X, Olivera C, Combes Ph, Grellet B, Granier Th (1996) Zonación tectónica, primer estadio de la zonación sismotectónica del NE de la Península Ibérica (Cataluña). Geogaceta 20: 853–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2002) Wp04: guidelines for the implementation of the level I methodology for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No.EVK4-CT-2000-00014, Genoa

  • GNDT: Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti (1994) Scheda di esposizione e vulnerabilità e di rilevamento danni di primo livello e secondo livello (muratura e cemento armato), Roma

  • Goula X, Godefroy P (1985) Évaluation de l’alea simique regional. Zonage à petite échelle. Génie Parasismique, pp 207–221

  • Grellet B, Combes Ph, Garnier Th, Phillip H (1993) Sismotectonique de la France Métropolitane. Mémories de la Sociéte Géologique de France, No 164, vol I, 76 pp

  • Grünthal G (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998. Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Pres, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology technical manual, prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC

  • INFOCCA (2002) Informació del Centre de Cartografia Automàtica (INFOCCA). Institut Municipal d’Informática, Ajuntament de Barcelona (in catalan)

  • Irizarry J (2004) An advanced approach to seismic risk assessment. Application to the cultural heritage and the urban system of Barcelona. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona

  • Irizarry J, Goula X, Susagna T, Roca A, Mañ á F (2004) Earthquake risk scenarios for monuments in Barcelona, Spain. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver

  • Kappos A, Pitilakis K, Stylianidis K, Morfidis K (1995) Cost-benefit analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings in Thessaloniki, based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on seismic zonation, Nice,vol 1, pp 406–413

  • Kallberg KT, Cornell CA (1969) Seismic risk in Southern California. Research Report MIT, Department of Civil engineering, Boston

  • Lagomarsino S (2006) On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4: 415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S, Podestà S, Resemini S (2003) Wp5: vulnerability of historical and monumental buildings handbook. RISK-UE: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No. EVK4-CT-2000-00014

  • Lagomarsino S, Podestà S, Resemini S (2004) Observational and mechanical models for the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference earthquake engineering, Vancouver

  • Lantada N (2007) Evaluación del riesgo sísmico mediante métodos avanzados y técnicas GIS. Aplicación a la ciudad de Barcelona. Doctoral Thesis. Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona Available via DIALOG. http://www.tdx.cat/TDX-0401109-133809. Accessed 30 Jan 2009

  • Lantada N, Pujades LG, Barbat AH (2008) Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation. A comparison. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9212-4

  • Lungu D, Aldea A, Arion A, Vacareanu R, Petrescu F, Cornea T (2001) WP1 report: European distinctive features, inventory database and typology. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No. EVK4-CT-2000-00014

  • Martí JO (2000) Anàlisi de risc sísmic en la ciutat de Barcelona. Aspectes relacionats amb l’evolució espai—temporal del risc, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (in catalan)

  • Milutinoviç ZV, Trendafiloski GS (2003) WP04: vulnerability of current buildings handbook. RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Contract No. EVK4-CT-2000-00014, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (IZIIS), Skopje

  • McGuire R (1976) EQRISK: evaluation of earthquake risk to site. Fortran computer program for seismic risk analysis. US Geological Survey Open File Report 76–67

  • Mouroux P, Bertrand M, Bour M, Brun BL, Depinois S, Masure P, Risk-UE Team (2004) The European Risk-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference earthquake engineering, Vancouver (CD-ROM, Paper No. 3329)

  • MSK-81 (1981) Seismic intensity scale in report on the ad-hoc panel meeting of experts on up-dating of the MSK-64 seismic intensity scale. Jena, 1981. Gerlands Beitr Geophys, Leipzig

  • NCSE-02 (2002) Normativa de Construcción Sismorresistente Española, Comisión Permanente de Normas Sismorresistentes, Real Decreto 997/2002. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 244 del 11 de octubre de 2002

  • NCSE-94 (1994) Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente Española, Parte General y de Edificación, Comisión Permanente de Normas Sismorresistentes, Real Decreto 2543/1994, Boletín Oficial del Estado No 33 del 29 de Diciembre de 1994: 3936–3980

  • Olivera C, Riera A, Lambert J, Banda E, Alexandre P (1994) Els terratrèmols de l’any 1373 al Pirineu: efectes a Espanya i França. Servei Geològic de Catalunya. Generalitat de Catalunya, Monografies, No. 3

  • Paricio A (2001) Secrets d’un sistema constructiu: l’Eixample. Edicions UPC, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins JB, Harrald J, Jeong D, Chuaqui B (1996) Shaken awake estimates of uninhabitable dwelling units and peak shelter populations in future earthquakes affecting the San Francisco Bay region. Association of Bay Area Governments, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • PGS-1 (1968) Norma sismorresistente PGS-1(1968), parte A, Comisión Interministerial de la Presidencia del Gobierno, Decreto 106/1968, del 16 de enero de 1969

  • Secanell R (1999) Avaluació de la perillositat sísmica a Catalunya: anàlisi de sensibilitat per a diferents models d′ocurrència i paràmetres sísmics, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Barcelona

  • Secanell R, Goula X, Susagna T, Fleta J, Roca A (2004) Seismic hazard zonation of Catalonia, Spain, integrating uncertainties. J Seismol 8: 24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1996) Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J Struct Eng ASCE 122(12): 1459–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sponheuer W (1960) Methoden zur Herdtirefenbestimmung in der Makroseismic. Freiberger Forschungshefte, C88

  • Susagna T, Goula X (1998) Atlas Sísmic de Catalunya, vol 1. Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya

  • Udwin D (1981) Introductory spatial analysis. Ed. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacareanu R, Lungu, D, Aldea A, Arion C (2004) WP07: report seismic risk scenarios handbook. Risk-UE Project, Bucarest

  • Whitman RW (1973) Damage probability matrices for prototype buildings. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering Research, Report R73-57, Cambridge

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Lantada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lantada, N., Irizarry, J., Barbat, A.H. et al. Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method. Bull Earthquake Eng 8, 201–229 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z

Keywords

Navigation