Abstract
This paper assesses the fundamental approaches and main procedures adopted in the seismic design of steel frames, with emphasis on the provisions of Eurocode 8. The study covers moment-resisting as well as concentrically-braced frame configurations. Code requirements in terms of design concepts, behaviour factors, ductility considerations and capacity design verifications, are examined. The rationality and clarity of the design principles employed in Eurocode 8, especially those related to the explicit definitions of dissipative and non dissipative zones and associated capacity design criteria, are highlighted. Various requirements that differ notably from the provisions of other seismic codes are also pointed out. More importantly, several issues that can lead to unintentional departure from performance objectives or to impractical solutions, as a consequence of inherent assumptions or possible misinterpretations, are identified and a number of clarifications and modifications suggested. In particular, it is shown that the implications of stability and drift requirements as well as some capacity design checks in moment frames, together with the treatment of post-buckling response and the distribution of inelastic demand in braced frames, are areas that merit careful consideration within the design process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) (1999) Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings. AISC, Chicago, IL
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.) (2002) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC, Chicago, IL
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.) (2005a) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC, Chicago, IL
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) (2005b) Specification for structural steel buildings, AISC-360-05, AISC, Chicago, IL
ANSI/AISC (2005) Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment resisting frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358, AISC, Chicago, IL
ASCE/SEI (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE 7-05, American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA
Bertero VV, Anderson JC, Krawinkler H (1994) Performance of steel building structures during the Northridge earthquake, UCB/EERC-94/04, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Broderick BM, Goggins JM, Elghazouli AY (2005) Cyclic performance of steel and composite bracing members. J Construct Steel Res 61(4): 493–514. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.09.006
Broderick BM, Elghazouli AY, Goggins JM (2008) Earthquake testing and response analysis of concentrically-braced sub-frames. J Construct Steel Res 64(9): 997–1007. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.014
Castro JM, Elghazouli AY, Izzuddin BA (2005) Modelling of the panel zone in steel and composite moment frames. Eng Struct 27(1): 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.008
Castro JM, Davila-Arbona FJ, Elghazouli AY (2008) Seismic design approaches for panel zones in steel moment frames. J Earthq Eng 12(S1): 34–51. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35783-4
Elghazouli AY (1996) Ductility of frames with semi-rigid connections. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, paper no. 1126
Elghazouli AY (2003) Seismic design procedures for concentrically braced frames. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 156: 381–394
Elghazouli AY (2007) Seismic design of steel structures to Eurocode 8. Struct Eng 85(12): 26–31
Elghazouli AY, Broderick BM, Goggins J, Mouzakis H, Carydis P, Bouwkamp J, Plumier A (2005) Shake table testing of tubular steel bracing members, Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 158: 229–241
Eurocode 3 (2005) Design of steel structures, part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings, BS-EN1993-1-1-2005, European Committee for Standardization. CEN, Brussels
Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN1998-1-2004, European Committee for Standardization. CEN, Brussels
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2000) Recommended seismic design provisions for new moment frame buildings. FEMA 350, Washington, DC
Goel SC, El-Tayem A (1986) Cyclic load behavior of angle X-bracing. J Struct Eng 112(11): 2528–2539. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2528)
Goggins JM, Broderick BM, Elghazouli AY, Lucas AS (2006) Behaviour of tubular steel members under cyclic axial loading. J Construct Steel Res 62: 121–131. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.04.012
Gupta A, Krawinkler H (2000) Dynamic P-delta effects for flexible inelastic steel structures. J Struct Eng 126(1): 145–154. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(145)
Ikeda K, Mahin SA (1986) Cyclic response of steel braces. J Struct Eng 112(2): 342–361. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(342)
Lehman DE, Roeder CW, Herman D, Johnson S, Kotulka B (2008) Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections. J Struct Eng 134(6): 890–889. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(890)
Maison BF, Popov EP (1980) Cyclic response prediction for braced steel frames. J Struct Eng 106(7): 1401–1416
Popov EP, Black GR (1981) Steel struts under severe cyclic loadings. J Struct Eng 107(9): 1857–1881
Remennikov AM, Walpole WR (1988) A note on compression strength reduction factor for a buckled strut in seismic-resisting braced system. Eng Struct 20(8): 779–782. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00106-5
SAC (1995) Survey and assessment of damage to buildings affected by the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994, SAC95-06, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA
SAC (1996) Experimental investigations of beam-column sub-assemblages, SAC95-09, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA
Sanchez-Ricart L, Plumier A (2008) Parametric study of ductile moment-resisting steel frames: a first step towards Eurocode 8 calibration. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 37: 1135–1155. doi:10.1002/eqe.809
SEAOC (1990) Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA
Yoo J, Roeder CW, Lehman DE (2008) Analytical performance simulation of special concentrically braced frames. J Struct Eng 134(6): 881–889. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(881)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elghazouli, A.Y. Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures. Bull Earthquake Eng 8, 65–89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6