Abstract
An application of the EC8-3 procedure for safety assessment is presented herein. Besides testing the applicability of the code procedure, this application aims to assess the consistency of the safety assessment results that are obtained. Based on the application of the EC8-3 procedure, the study assesses if the different methods of analysis that are permitted lead to similar safety results and identifies the factors that may affect these results. Furthermore, the results obtained by the EC8-3 procedure are complemented by a probabilistic approach yielding their corresponding fragility values. By comparing the D/C ratios and the probabilistic results, the application aims to determine if similar D/C ratios lead to similar probabilistic results. Furthermore, the application tries to determine if a correlation can be established between the D/C ratios and the expected fragility values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aslani H, Miranda E (2005) Probability-based seismic response analysis. Eng Struct 27(8): 1151–1163. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015
CEB (1996) RC frames under earthquake loading. Bulletin n° 231, Comité Euro-International du Béton
CEN (2004) EN 1998-1 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization
CEN (2005) EN 1998-3 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. European Committee for Standardization
Chopra AK, Goel RK (2001) Direct displacement-based design: use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra. Earthq Spectra 17(1): 47–64. doi:10.1193/1.1586166
Costa AG, Costa AC (1987) Force-displacement hysteretic model adequate to the seismic analysis of structures. Technical Report, Núcleo de Dinâmica Aplicada, Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon (in Portuguese)
Chrysostomou CZ (2005) A pilot application of Eurocode 8 for the seismic assessment and retrofit of a real building. International Conference “250th Anniversary of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake”, Lisbon
Dymiotis C, Kappos AJ, Chryssanthopoulos MC (1999) Seismic reliability of R/C frames with uncertain drift and member capacity. J Struct Eng 125(9): 1038–1047. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:9(1038)
Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, Mccoy E, Mendis R (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. J Earthq Eng 10(1): 67–89. doi:10.1142/S1363246906002736
Haselton CB, Baker JW (2006) Ground motion intensity measures for collapse capacity prediction: choice of optimal spectral period and effect of spectral shape, 8th National Conference on Earthq Engineering, San Francisco
Hoaglin D, Mosteller F, Tukey J (eds) (1983) Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. Wiley, New York
Iervolino I, Maddaloni G, Cosenza E (2008) Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures. J Earthq Eng 12(1): 54–90
Jalayer F, Cornell CA (2008) Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam. doi:10.1002/eqe.876
LessLoss (2006) LessLoss-risk mitigation for earthquakes and landslides. Applications of probabilistic seismic assessment methods to selected case studies. Technical report No. 78. Integrated research & development project of the European commission. Avaliable from URL: http://www.lessloss.org/main/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=421
LessLoss (2007) LessLoss-risk mitigation for earthquakes and landslides. On the probabilistic evaluation of Eurocode 8. Technical report No. 129. Integrated research & development project of the European commission. Avaliable from URL: http://www.lessloss.org/main/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=424
Luco N, Cornell CA (2007) Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthq Spectra 23(2): 357–392. doi:10.1193/1.2723158
Masi A, Vona M, Manfredi V (2008) A parametric study on RC existing buildings to compare different analysis methods considered in the European seismic code (EC8-3). Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthq Engineering, Beijing
McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21: 239–245. doi:10.2307/1268522
Mpampatsikos V, Nascimbene R, Petrini L (2008a) A critical review of the R.C. frame existing building assessment procedure according to Eurocode 8 and Italian seismic code. J Earthq Eng 12(S1): 52–82
Mpampatsikos V, Nascimbene R, Petrini L (2008b) Some considerations about the Eurocode 8 R.C. frame building assessment procedure. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthq Engineering, Beijing
OPCM (2003) Primi elementi in material di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. Ordinanza 3274. Governo Italiano (in Italian).
Padgett J, Nielson B, DesRoches R (2008) Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 37(5): 711–725. doi:10.1002/eqe.782
Pinto PE, Giannini R, Franchin P (2004) Seismic reliability analysis of structures. IUSS Press Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Pavia
Pinto PE, Franchin P (2008) Assessing existing buildings with Eurocode 8 part 3: a discussion with some proposals. Background documents for the “Eurocodes: background and applications” workshop. Brussels, Belgium
Rodrigues H (2006) Development and calibration of numerical models for the seismic analysis of buildings. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Porto
Romão X (2002) New models for the seismic design of structures. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Porto
Varum H (1997) Numerical model for the seismic analysis of reinforced concrete plane frames. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Porto
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romão, X., Delgado, R., Guedes, J. et al. A comparative application of different EC8-3 procedures for the seismic safety assessment of existing structures. Bull Earthquake Eng 8, 91–118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9123-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9123-8