Abstract
The article outlines the main findings and conclusions of the QUAKER research project and other related studies on the behaviour of foundations built on top of a rupturing dip-slip fault. Although emphasis is placed on normal faults, the derived conclusions are valid for reverse faults, as well. A key conclusion is that it is quite feasible to design a foundation to withstand an underneath rupturing fault. Practical design recommendations suitable for developing future Code requirements on the subject, are developed on the basis of the presented conclusions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G (2007a) Foundation–structure systems over a rupturing normal fault: part I. Observations after the Kocaeli 1999 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 5(3): 253–275
Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G (2007b) Behaviour of structure–foundation systems over a rupturing normal fault: part II. Analysis of the Kocaeli case histories. Bull Earthq Eng 5(3): 277–301
Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Bransby MF, Davies MCR, El Nahas A (2007) Fault rupture propagation through sand: finite element analysis and validation through centrifuge experiments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(8): 943–958
Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Bransby MF, Davies MCR, El Nahas A (2008a) Normal fault rupture interaction with strip foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 134 (in print)
Anastasopoulos I, Callerio A, Bransby MF, Davies MCR, El Nahas A, Faccioli E, Gazetas G, Masella A, Paolucci R, Pecker A, Rossignol E (2008b) Numerical analyses of fault–foundation interaction. Bull Earthq Eng doi:10.1007/s10518-008-9078-1
Berill JB (1983) Two-dimensional analysis of the effect of fault rupture on buildings with shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2(3): 156–160
Bransby MF, Davies MCR, El Nahas A (2008a) Centrifuge modelling of normal fault–foundation interaction. Bull Earthq Eng doi:10.1007/s10518-008-9079-0
Bransby MF, Davies MCR, El Nahas A (2008b) Centrifuge modelling of reverse fault–foundation interaction. Bull Earthq Eng doi:10.1007/s10518-008-9080-7
Bray JD (2001) Developing mitigation measures for the hazards associated with earthquake surface fault rupture. Workshop on seismic fault-induced failures—possible remedies for damage to urban facilities. University of Tokyo Press, pp 55–79
EC8 (1994) Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. prEN1998-5, Final draft August 2003. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
Duncan JM, Lefebvre G (1973) Earth pressure on structures due to fault movement. J Soil Mech Found Eng, ASCE 99: 1153–1163
Faccioli E, Anastasopoulos I, Callerio A, Gazetas G (2008) Case histories of fault–foundation interaction. Bull Earthq Eng [Special issue: Integrated approach to fault rupture- and soil-foundation interaction, Companion paper (submitted for possible publication)]
Gazetas G, Anastasopoulos I, Apostolou M (2007) Shallow and deep foundations under fault rupture or strong seismic shaking. Geotech Earthq Eng, Springer, chap 9, pp 185–217
Paolucci R, Yilmaz T (2007) Limit analysis of fault–foundation interaction. Bull Earthq Eng [Special issue: Integrated approach to fault rupture- and soil-foundation interaction, Companion paper (submitted for possible publication)]
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4): 974–1002
Youd TL, Bardet J-P, Bray JD (2000) Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999 reconnaissance report. Earthq Spectra, Suppl A to vol 16, 456 pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gazetas, G., Pecker, A., Faccioli, E. et al. Preliminary design recommendations for dip-slip fault–foundation interaction. Bull Earthquake Eng 6, 677–687 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9082-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9082-5