Skip to main content
Log in

Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Commission funded the RISK-UE project in 1999 with the aim of providing an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios for European towns and regions. In the framework of Risk-UE project, two methods were proposed, originally derived and calibrated by the authors, for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings and for the evaluation of earthquake risk scenarios: a macroseismic model, to be used with macroseismic intensity hazard maps, and a mechanical based model, to be applied when the hazard is provided in terms of peak ground accelerations and spectral values. The vulnerability of the buildings is defined by vulnerability curves, within the macroseismic method, and in terms of capacity curves, within the mechanical method. In this paper, the development of both vulnerability and capacity curves is presented with reference to an assumed typological classification system; moreover, their cross-validation is presented. The parameters of the two methods and the steps for their operative implementation are provided in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ATC13 (1987) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management (FEMA), Redwood City, CA

  • Balbi A, Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2004) A vulnerability method for historical centre buildings. In: Proc. 11th Italian conference on Earthquake engineering, Genoa, Italy

  • Benedetti D, Petrini V (1984) On seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: proposal of an evaluation procedure. L’industria delle costruzioni 18:66–78 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K76 scale. In: Proc. 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Athens

  • Bramerini F, Di Pasquale G, Orsini A, Pugliese A, Romeo R, Sabetta F (1995) Seismic risk for the Italian territory. Proposal for a methodology and preliminary results. Technical report from Servizio Sismico Nazionale SSN/RT/95/01, Rome (in Italian)

  • Cattari S, Curti E, Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S, Parodi S, Penna A (2004) A mechanical model for the vulnerability assessment and damage scenario of masonry buildings at urban scale. In: Proc. 11th Italian conference on earthquake engineering. Genoa, Italy

  • CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee For Standardisation (CEN), Brussels

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999) Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic spectrum. Earthq Spectra, 15(4):637–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn A, Spence R (1992) Earthquake protection. Wiley Ltd., Chichester, England, ISBN 0 471 91833 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Zuccaro G, Kappos A, Coburn A (1994) Report of the EAEE Working Group 3: Vulnerability and risk analysis. In: Proc. 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, vol. 4. Vienna, pp 3049–3077

  • Dubois D, Parade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2000) A non linear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra, 16(3):573–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SA (1998) The Capacity Spectrum Method. In: Proc. 11th European conference on earthquake engineering. Paris

  • Freeman SA (2004) Why properly code designed and constructed buildings have survived major earthquakes. In: Proc. 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, Canada (CD-Rom)

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2001) A methodology for the seismic vulnerability analysis of buildings. In: Proc. 10th Italian conference on earthquake engineering. Potenza, Italy (in Italian)

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2002) A methodology for the vulnerability analysis of Built-up Areas. In: Lungu D, Wenzel F, Mouroux P, Tojo I (eds) Proc. of the international conference on earthquake loss estimation and risk reduction, vol. 2. Bucharest, Romania, pp 3–18, ISBN 973-85112–9-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2003) Seismic Risk Analysis: a method for the vulnerability assessment of built-up areas. In: Balkema, AA. (eds) Eur safety and reliability conference ESREL. vol.18 Maastricht, The Netherlands, London (UK), ISBN 90 5809 595 9, pp 671–679

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2004) A macroseismic model for the vulnerability assessment of buildings. In: Proc. 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, Canada, paper 896 (CD-Rom)

  • Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2005). Fuzzy-random approach for a seismic vulnerability model. In: Proc. ICOSSAR2005 safety and reliability of engineering systems and structures. Rome, Italy, Millpress, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 5966 040 0, pp 2879–2887

  • Giovinazzi S (2005). The vulnerability assessment and the damage scenario in seismic risk analysis. Ph.D Thesis of the doctoral course “Risk Management on the built environment” jointly organized by University of Florence (I) and TU-Braunschweig (D)

  • Goel RK, Chopra AK (1997) Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. J struct Eng-ASCE, 123(11):1454–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunthal G (1998) European Macroseismic Scale. Chaiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, vol. 15 Luxembourg

  • HAZUS (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology—technical and user manuals, vol. 1–3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC

  • Kircher CA, Nassar AA, Kuster O, Holmes WT (1997) Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthq Spectra, 13(4):663–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S (2006) Vulnerability assessment of historical buildings. In: Goula X, Oliveira CS, Roca A (eds) Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk, ISBN 1-4020-3524-1

  • parameters. Bulletin Seismological Soci Am 67:877–915

  • Mouroux P, Bertrand E, Bour M, Le Brun B, Depinois S, Masure P (2004) The European RISK-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios. In: Proc. of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada, paper 3329 (CD-Rom)

  • Ross TJ (1995) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw Hill, New York, ISBN 0 07 0539170

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1994) Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23:507–521

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Lagomarsino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lagomarsino, S., Giovinazzi, S. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 4, 415–443 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z

Keywords

Navigation