Abstract
Earthquake loss models are subject to many large uncertainties associated with the input parameters that define the seismicity, the ground motion, the exposure and the vulnerability characteristics of the building stock. In order to obtain useful results from a loss model, it is necessary to correctly identify and characterise these uncertainties, incorporate them into the calculations, and then interpret the results taking account of the influence of the uncertainties. An important element of the uncertainty will always be the aleatory variability in the ground-motion prediction. Options for handling this variability include following the traditional approach used in site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard assessment or embedding the variability within the vulnerability calculations at each location. The physical interpretation of both of these approaches, when applied to many sites throughout an urban area to assess the overall effects of single or multiple earthquake events, casts doubts on their validity. The only approach that is consistent with the real nature of ground-motion variability is to model the shaking component of the loss model by triggering large numbers of earthquake scenarios that sample the magnitude and spatial distributions of the seismicity, and also the distribution of ground motions for each event as defined by the aleatory variability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson N.A., Youngs R.R. (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 82(1): 505–510
Abrahamson N.A., Bommer J.J. (2004) Probability and uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 21(2): 603–607
Ambraseys N.N., Douglas J., Sarma S.K., Smit P.M. (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 3(1): 1–53
Anderson J.G., Brune J.N. (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis without the ergodic assumption. Seismological Research Letters 70(1): 19–28
Bazzurro P. and Luco, N. (2005) Accounting for uncertainty and correlation in earthquake loss estimation. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR ’05), Rome, Italy.
Bommer J.J., Mendis R. (2005) Scaling of spectral displacement ordinates with damping ratios. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34(2): 145–165
Bommer J.J., Scherbaum F., Bungum H., Cotton F., Sabetta F., Abrahamson N.A. (2005) On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic hazard analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95(2): 377–389
Bommer J.J., Douglas J., Strasser F.O. (2003) Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1(2): 171–203
Bommer J.J., Spence R., Erdik M., Tabuchi S., Aydinoglu N., Booth E., del Re D., Peterken O. (2002) Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. Journal of Seismology 6(3): 431–446
Boore, D.M. (1997) Estimates of average spectral amplitudes at FOAKE sites. Appendix C in Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Kana, D. D., Kennedy, R. P. and Schiff, A. J. An evaluation of methodology for seismic qualification of equipment, cable trays and ducts in ALWR plants by use of experience data. NUREG/CR-6464 and BNLNUREG-52500, C-1–C-69.
Boore D. (2005) Erratum: equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismological Research Letters 76(3): 368–369
Cao T., Petersen M.D., Cramer C.H., Toppozada T.R., Reichle M.S., Davis J.F. (1999) The calculation of expected loss using probabilistic seismic hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 89(4): 867–876
Crowley, H. and Bommer, J.J. (2006) Modelling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, this volume.
Crowley H., Pinho R., Bommer J.J. (2004) A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2(2): 173–219
Crowley H., Bommer J.J., Pinho R., Bird J.F. (2005) The impact of epistemic uncertainty on an earthquake loss model. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34(14): 1653–1685
Douglas J. (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates. Earth Science Reviews 61, 43–104
FEMA (2000) FEMA 366: HAZUS Estimated Earthquake Losses for the United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC
FEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC
Grossi, P. (2000) Quantifying the uncertainty in seismic risk and loss estimation. Proceedings of the Second EuroConference on Global Change and Catastrophe Risk Management: Earthquake Risks in Europe, Austria.
Joyner, W.B. and Boore, D.M. (1988) Measurement, characterization and prediction of strong ground motion. Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2, GT Div/ASCE, 27–30 June 1988, Utah, 43–102.
Kircher C.A., Nassar A.A., Kustu O., Holmes W.T. (1997) Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthquake Spectra 13(4): 663–682
Krinitzsky E.L. (2002) How to obtain earthquake ground motions for engineering design. Engineering Geology 65, 1–16
Leonard G., Steinberg D.M. (2002) Seismic hazard assessment: simultaneous effect of earthquakes at close and distant sites. Earthquake Spectra 18(4): 615–629
Liechti D., Rüttener E., Zbinden, A. (2000) Disaggregation of annual average loss. Paper presented at XXV European Geophysical Society General Assembly, Nice, France.
McGuire R.K., Cornell C.A., Toro G.R. (2005) The case for using mean seismic hazard. Earthquake Spectra 21(3): 879–886
Musson R.M.W. (1999). Determination of design earthquakes in seismic hazard analysis through Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3(4): 463–474
Musson R.M.W. (2005) Against fractiles. Earthquake Spectra 21(3): 887–891
Pinto P.E., Giannini R., Franchin P. (2004) Methods for Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy
Rhoades D.A., McVerry G.H. (2001) Joint hazard of earthquake shaking at two or more locations. Earthquake Spectra 17(4): 697–710
Smith W.D. (2003) Earthquake hazard and risk assessment in New Zealand by Monte Carlo methods. Seismological Research Letters 74(3): 298–304
Wang M., Takada T. (2005) Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 21(4): 1137–1156
Wesson R.L., Perkins D.M. (2001) Spatial correlation of probabilistic earthquake ground motion and loss. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(6): 1498–1515
Zolfaghari, M.R. (2000) Earthquake loss estimation model for southern Europe. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Palm Springs, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bommer, J.J., Crowley, H. The Influence of Ground-Motion Variability in Earthquake Loss Modelling. Bull Earthquake Eng 4, 231–248 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9008-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9008-z