A Study of Piles during Earthquakes: Issues of Design and Analysis

Article

Abstract

The seismic response of pile foundations is a very complex process involving inertial interaction between structure and pile foundation, kinematic interaction between piles and soils, seismically induced pore-water pressures (PWP) and the non-linear response of soils to strong earthquake motions. In contrast, very simple pseudo-static methods are used in engineering practice to determine response parameters for design. These methods neglect several of the factors cited above that can strongly affect pile response. Also soil–pile interaction is modelled using either linear or non-linear springs in a Winkler computational model for pile response. The reliability of this constitutive model has been questioned. In the case of pile groups, the Winkler model for analysis of a single pile is adjusted in various ways by empirical factors to yield a computational model for group response. Can the results of such a simplified analysis be adequate for design in all situations?

The lecture will present a critical evaluation of general engineering practice for estimating the response of pile foundations in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils during earthquakes. The evaluation is part of a major research study on the seismic design of pile foundations sponsored by a Japanese construction company with interests in performance based design and the seismic response of piles in reclaimed land. The evaluation of practice is based on results from field tests, centrifuge tests on model piles and comprehensive non-linear dynamic analyses of pile foundations consisting of both single piles and pile groups.

Studies of particular aspects of pile–soil interaction were made. Piles in layered liquefiable soils were analysed in detail as case histories show that these conditions increase the seismic demand on pile foundations. These studies demonstrate the importance of kinematic interaction, usually neglected in simple pseudo-static methods. Recent developments in designing piles to resist lateral spreading of the ground after liquefaction are presented. A comprehensive study of the evaluation of pile cap stiffness coefficients was undertaken and a reliable method of selecting the single value stiffnesses demanded by mainstream commercial structural software was developed. Some other important findings from the study are: the relative effects of inertial and kinematic interactions between foundation and soil on acceleration and displacement spectra of the super-structure; a method for estimating whether inertial interaction is likely to be important or not in a given situation and so when a structure may be treated as a fixed based structure for estimating inertial loads; the occurrence of large kinematic moments when a liquefied layer or naturally occurring soft layer is sandwiched between two hard layers; and the role of rotational stiffness in controlling pile head displacements, especially in liquefiable soils. The lecture concludes with some recommendations for practice that recognize that design, especially preliminary design, will always be based on simplified procedures.

Keywords

case histories of pile failures centrifuge testing of piles dynamic effective stress analysis pile cap stiffnesses piles in liquefiable soils pseudo-static analysis of pile groups,  seismic response of pile groups 

References

  1. AASHTO1983Guide Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway BridgesAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation OfficialsWashington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Abghari, A. and Chai, J. (1995) Modeling of soil–pile superstructure interaction for bridge foundations, Performance of Deep Foundations under Seismic Loading. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 51, pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
  3. API (1993) Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms, American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
  4. ATC-31978Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings (ATC-3-06)The Applied Technology CouncilRedwood, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. ATC1996Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations, ATC 32Applied Technology CouncilRedwood City, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardet, J.P., Tobita, T., Mace, N., Hu, J. 2002Regional modeling of liquefaction induced ground deformationEarthquake Spectra181946Google Scholar
  7. Barton, Y.O. 1982Laterally loaded model piles in sand: Centrifuge tests and finite element analysesUniversity of CambridgeUKPhD. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandenburg S.J., Singh, P., Boulanger, R.W, Kutter. B.L. (2001) Behavior of piles in laterally spreading ground during earthquakes. CDROM Proc. 6th CALTRANS Seismic Research Workshop, Sacramento, CA. Google Scholar
  9. Brandenburg, S.J., Boulanger, R.W., Chang, D. and Kutter, B.L. (2005) Mechanisms of load transfer between pile groups and laterally spreading non-liquefied crust layers, Proceedings, International Symposium on Earthquake Engineering Commemorating 10th Anniversary of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake (ISEE Kobe 2005), Abstract Volume, p 59. Google Scholar
  10. Brown, D.A., Bollman, H.T. 1996Lateral behavior of a pile group in sandJournal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE11412611276Google Scholar
  11. Byrne, P.M. (1991) A cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore pressure model for sand. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Eng. and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Report 1.24, Vol. 1, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
  12. Chang, Y.L. 1937Discussion of lateral pile loading testsTransactions of ASCE102272278Google Scholar
  13. Dobry, R. and Abdoun, T. (2001) Recent studies of centrifuge modeling of liquefaction and its effect on deep foundations. In: S. Prakash (ed.), 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, pp. 26–31, San Diego CA.Google Scholar
  14. Dobry, R., Taboada, V. and Liu, L. (1995) Centrifuge modeling of liquefaction effects during earthquakes. In: K. Ishihara (ed.), Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 1291–1324, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  15. ECN (2003) prEN 1998–5:2003, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 5: Foundations, Retaining Structures and Geotechnical Aspects, European Commission for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  16. Feagin, L.W. (1937) Lateral pile loading tests. Transactions of ACSE 102.Google Scholar
  17. Finn, W.D. Liam (1999) Lessons from recent earthquakes on foundation performance, design and analysis, In: Proc., Inaugural Anabuki Chair Symposium, Faculty of Engineering, Kagawa University, FEKU TN009. Google Scholar
  18. Finn, W.D., Liam, , Lee, K.W., Martin, G.R. 1977An effective stress model for liquefactionJournal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division103517533ASCE, Proc. Paper, 13008Google Scholar
  19. Finn, W.D. Liam and Gohl, W.H. (1987) Centrifuge model studies of piles under simulated earthquake loading. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Dynamic Response of Pile Foundations: Experiment, Observation and Analysis, ASCE Special Technical Publication. Google Scholar
  20. Finn, W.D. Liam and Yogendrakumar, M. (1988) Tara-3FL: computer program for the analysis of large strain flow deformations, Report, Soil Mechanics Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Google Scholar
  21. Finn, W.D. Liam, Thavaraj, T., Wilson, D.W., Boulanger, R.W. and Kutter, B. (1999) Seismic analysis of piles and pile groups in liquefiable sand. In Proceedings, 7th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, NUMOG VI, Graz, pp. 287–292, Austria, September.Google Scholar
  22. Finn, W.D. Liam and Thavaraj, T. (2001) Deep foundations in liquefiable soils: case histories, centrifuge tests and methods of analysis. In CD-ROM Proceedings, 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, CA, March 26–31.Google Scholar
  23. Fleming, W.G.K., Weltman, A.J., Randolph, M.F. 1992Piling Engineering2Blackie and SonGlasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Gazetas, G., Dobry, R. 1984Horizontal response of piles in layered soilsJournal of Geotechnology Engineering, ASCE1102040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gazetas, G., Fan, K., Kaynia, A. 1993Dynamic response of pile groups with different configurationsSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering12239257Google Scholar
  26. Gazioglu, S.M., O’Neill, M.W 1984

    An evaluation of p-y relationships in cohesive soils

    Meyer, J.R. eds. Proceedings of the ASCE Symposium on Analysis and Design of Pile FoundationsASCE National ConventionSan Francisco, CaliforniaOct. 1-5, 1984
    Google Scholar
  27. Gohl, W.B. 1991Response of pile foundations to simulated earthquake loading: experimental and analytical resultsDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, VancouverCanadaPhD. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamada, M., Yasuda, S., Isoyama, R. and Emoto, K. (1986) Study on Liquefaction Induced Permanent Ground Displacements. Association for Development of Earthquake.Google Scholar
  29. Liu, L., Dobry, R. 1995Effect of liquefaction on lateral response of piles by centrifuge testsNational Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER) Bulletin9711Google Scholar
  30. JRA (1996) Specifications for Highway Bridges, Part V, Seismic Design. Japan Road Association. Google Scholar
  31. JWWA1997Seismic Design and Construction Guidelines for Water Supply FacilitiesJapan Water Works AssociationTokyoGoogle Scholar
  32. Imbsen, R.A., Penzien, J. 1986Evaluation of Energy Absorption Characteristics of Highway Bridges under Seismic ConditionsEarthquake Engineering Research Center, University of CaliforniaBerkeley, CAVol. I. Report No. EERC-1984/17Google Scholar
  33. Kagawa, T., Kraft, L. 1980Seismic p-y response of flexible pilesJournal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE106899919GT8Google Scholar
  34. Kimura, M., Kosa, K. and Morita, Y. (1994) Full-scale failure tests on laterally loaded group piles. In: Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Deep Foundation Practice incorporating PILETALK International ‘94, Singapore, pp. 147–154.Google Scholar
  35. Lam, I and Martin, G.R. (1986) Seismic design of highway bridge foundations, Vol. II, Design procedures and guidelines. Report No. FHWA/RD-86/102, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia. Google Scholar
  36. Liu, l., Dobry, R. 1995Effect of liquefaction on lateral response of piles by centrifuge testsNational Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research. (NCEER) Bulletin9711Google Scholar
  37. Martin, G.R. (2004) The seismic design of bridges – geotechnical and foundation design issues. In: Proc., ASCE Specialty Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects, Vol. 1 pp. 137–166, Los Angeles, July, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 126.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, G.R., Liam Finn, W.D., Seed, H.B. 1975Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loadingJournal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE101423438Google Scholar
  39. Masing, G. (1926) Eigenspannungen und verfestigung beim messing. In: Proc., 2nd Int. Congress of Applied Mechanics , Zurich, Switzerland. Google Scholar
  40. Matsui, T. and Oda, K. (1996) Foundation damage of structures. Special Issue of Soils and Foundations, pp. 189–200, Japanese Geotechnical Society, January.Google Scholar
  41. Matlock, H. (1970) Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay. Proc., 2nd Annual Offshore Technology Conf, Houston, Tex. pp. 577–594.Google Scholar
  42. Matlock, H., Foo, S.H.C. and Bryant, L.M. (1978) Simulation of lateral pile behavior under earthquake loading. In Proc., Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE Specialty Conference, pp. 601–619, Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
  43. MCEER/ATC ,  2003Recommended LFRD Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway BridgesUniversity of BuffaloBuffalo, NYPart I: Specifications, Part I: Commentary and Appendices. MCEER/ATC49. MCEER Report No. MCEER-03SP03Google Scholar
  44. Murchison, J.M., O’Neill, M.W. 1984

    An evaluation of p–y relationships in cohesionless soils

    Meyer, J.M. eds. Proceedings of the ASCE Symposium on Analysis and Design of Pile FoundationsASCE National ConventionSan Francisco, California174191Oct 1–5.
    Google Scholar
  45. O’Neill M.W. and Murchison, J.M. (1983) An Evaluation of p–y relationships in Sands. A report to the American Petroleum Institute, PRAC 82-41-1. Google Scholar
  46. Pinto, P., McVay, M. and Lai, P. (1997) Centrifuge testing of plumb and battered pile groups in sand. In Proc., Transportation Research Board, 17th Annual Meeting, pp. 1–17, Washington, Disrict of Columbia, Paper No. 551. Google Scholar
  47. Engineering, PMB 1988Par Pile Analysis ProgramPMB EngineeringSan Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  48. Poulos, H.G. 1971Behaviour of laterally loaded piles: I-single piles and II- pile groupsJournal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Divsion, ASCE97711731733–751.Google Scholar
  49. Ramos, R., Abdoun, T. and Dobry, R. (1999) Centrifuge modeling effects of super-structure stiffness on pile bending moments due to lateral spreading. In Proc., ASCE Symposium on Analysis and Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures Against Liquefaction, pp. 599–608.Google Scholar
  50. Randolph, M.F. 1981The response of piles to lateral loadingGeotechnique31247259Google Scholar
  51. Reese, L.C., Cox, W.R. and Koop, F.D. (1974) Analysis of laterally loaded piles in sand. Proc., 6th Annual Offshore Technology Conf, Houston, Tex., Paper No. 80. Google Scholar
  52. Rollins, , Kyle, M., Peterson, , Kris, T., Weaver, , Thomas, J. 1998Lateral load behavior of full scale pile group in clayJournal of Geotechnology and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE124468478Google Scholar
  53. Shapiro, D., Rojahn, C., Reavely, L.D., Smith, J.R., Morelli, U. 2000NEHRP Guidelines and Commentary for Seismic Rehabilitation of BuildingsEarthquake Spectra16227240Google Scholar
  54. Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J., Seed, H.B. 1972SHAKE: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered SitesEarthquake Engineering Research Center, University of CaliforniaBerkeley, CAReport No. EERC72-12Google Scholar
  55. Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M. 1970Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response AnalysisEarthquake Engineering Research CenterBerkeley, CAReport #EERC70-10Google Scholar
  56. Terzaghi, K. 1955Evaluation of coefficient of subgrade reactionGeotechnique5297326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thavaraj, T. 2001Seismic analysis of pile foundations for bridgesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver, CanadaPhD. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  58. Veletsos, A.S., Prasad, A.M. and Tang, Y. (1988) Design approaches for soil–structure interaction. In Proc. 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo. Google Scholar
  59. Veletsos, A.S., Wei, Y.T. 1971Lateral and rocking vibration of footingsJournal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE9712271248Google Scholar
  60. Ventura, C.E., Felber A.J. and Prion H.G.L. (1994a) Dynamic Evaluation of a Medium Span Bridge by Modal Testing. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, pp. 545–556, Halifax, Nova Scotia, August 8–11.Google Scholar
  61. Ventura C.E., Felber A.J. and Stiemer S.F. (1994b) Dynamic Characteristics of Bridges by Experimental Investigations of Ambient Vibrations – Queensborough Bridge. In Proceedings, 5th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, pp. 733–742, Chicago, Illinois, July.Google Scholar
  62. Wallace, J.W., Moehle, J.P. and Martinez-Cruzado, J. (1990) Implications for the design of shear wall buildings using data from recent earthquakes. In Proc. 4th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, CA. Google Scholar
  63. Weaver, T.J., Ashford, S.A. and Rollins, K.M. (2001) Development of p–y curves for a 0.6 m diameter CISS pile in liquefied sand, CDROM Proc. 6th CALTRANS Seismic Research Workshop, Sacramento, CA. Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, D.W. 1998Soil-pile superstructure interaction in liquefying sand and soft clayDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of CaliforniaBerkeley. CAPhD. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, D.W., Boulanger, R.W., Kutter, B.L. and Abghari, A. (1995) Dynamic centrifuge tests of pile supported structures in liquefiable sand. In Proc National Seismic Conf. on Bridges and Highways. Sponsored by Federal Highways Admin. and CALTRANS, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, D.W., Boulanger, R.W., Kutter, B.L. 2000Observed lateral resistance of liquefying sandJournal of Geotechnology and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE126898906Google Scholar
  67. Wu, G., Finn, W.D., Liam,  1997aDynamic elastic analysis of pile foundations using the finite element method in the frequency domainCanadian Geotechnical Journal343443Google Scholar
  68. Wu, G., Finn, , Liam , W.D. 1997bDynamic nonlinear analysis of pile foundations using the finite element method in the time domainCanadian Geotechnical Journal344452Google Scholar
  69. Yoshida, N, Yoshida, H. 1986TARA-3: A computer program to compute the response of 2-D embankments and soil-structure interaction systems to seismic loadingDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, VancouverBC CanadaReport Soil Mechanics GroupGoogle Scholar
  70. Youd, T.L., Hansen, C.M. and Bartlett, S.F. (1999) Revised MLR equations for predicting lateral spread displacement. In Proc., 7th U.S.-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities andCountermeasures against Liquefaction, Technical Report MCEER-99–0019, MCEER, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kagawa University, 2217-20, University of British ColumbiaHayashi-cho, Takamatsu, VancouverJapan, Canada

Personalised recommendations