Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Loss of Heterozygosity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Probability of Its Use for Clinical Classification of Variations

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Changes (or variants) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene sequences can have different lengths and clinical significance: from single nucleotide variants (SNV) and short insertions/deletions (<50 bp) to extended deletions and duplications (so-called copy number variations, or CNV). According to their clinical significance, all variants can be divided into pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign. Moreover, variants can be germinal (i.e. inherited from parents) and somatic (arising in the process of development of the organism). A specific somatic event is loss of heterozygosity (LOH), i.e. transition of one or many point and short variants from heterozygous to homozygous state. Such an event can be the key to the development of carcinogenesis for cells carrying a pathogenic variant, if we consider it within the framework of the Knudson’s two-hit carcinogenesis theory. We studied the prevalence and nature of LOH in of ovarian cancer samples carrying or not carrying a pathogenic variant. To this end, a full coding sequence of BRCA1/2 genes was determined in 30 pairs of DNA samples isolated from blood cells and paraffinized histological blocks of patients on a MiSeq Illumina instrument. Analyss of the obtained reads revealed 9 pathogenic point and short variants (30% patients): 6 germinal (20%) and 3 somatic (10%), and 8 somatic CNV (3 deletions and 5 duplications of several or all exons of the BRCA1 gene). LOH was detected in 70% patients; among the carriers of pathogenic variants - in 83%. For pathogenic variants, the percentage of reads with the alternative allele increased more often than for benign variants located in another gene, or detected in other patients (67% vs. 44%). However, the difference was statistically insignificant, which can be due to insufficient number of patients. Only in 3 of 21 cases of LOH (14%), it can be attributed to CNV. In other cases, LOH is most likely determined by gene conversion, but further research is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beristain E, Guerra I, Vidaurrazaga N, Burgos-Bretones J, Tejada MI. LOH analysis should not be used as a tool to assess whether UVs of BRCA1/2 are pathogenic or not. Fam. Cancer. 2010;9(3):289-290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chao A, Chang TC, Lapke N, Jung SM, Chi P, Chen CH, Yang LY, Lin CT, Huang HJ, Chou HH, Liou JD, Chen SJ, Wang TH, Lai CH. Prevalence and clinical significance of BRCA1/2 germline and somatic mutations in Taiwanese patients with ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(51):85,529-85,541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ermolenko NA, Boyarskikh UA, Kechin AA, Mazitova AM, Khrapov EA, Petrova VD, Lazarev AF, Kushlinskii NE, Filipenko ML. Massive parallel sequencing for diagnostic genetic testing of BRCA genes — a single center experience. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015;16(17):7935-7941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iyevleva AG, Suspitsin EN, Kroeze K, Gorodnova TV, Sokolenko AP, Buslov KG, Voskresenskiy DA, Togo AV, Kovalenko SP, Stoep Nv, Devilee P, Imyanitov EN. Non-founder BRCA1 mutations in Russian breast cancer patients. Cancer Lett. 2010;298(2):258-263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kechin A, Boyarskikh U, Kel A, Filipenko M. cutPrimers: a new tool for accurate cutting of primers from reads of targeted next generation sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2017. Jul 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2017.0096.

  6. Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22(3):568-576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, Jervis S, van Leeuwen FE, Milne RL, Andrieu N, Goldgar DE, Terry MB, Rookus MA, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, BRCA1 and BRCA2 Cohort Consortium, McGuffog L, Evans DG, Barrowdale D, Frost D, Adlard J, Ong KR, Izatt L, Tischkowitz M, Eeles R, Davidson R, Hodgson S, Ellis S, Nogues C, Lasset C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Fricker J.P, Faivre L, Berthet P, Hooning MJ, van der Kolk LE, Kets CM, Adank MA, John EM, Chung WK, Andrulis IL, Southey M, Daly MB, Buys SS, Osorio A, Engel C, Kast K, Schmutzler RK, Caldes T, Jakubowska A, Simard J, Friedlander ML, McLachlan SA, Machackova E, Foretova L, Tan YY, Singer CF, Olah E, Gerdes AM, Arver B, Olsson H. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2402-2416.

  8. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078-2079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maxwell KN, Wubbenhorst B, Wenz BM, De Sloover D, Pluta J, Emery L, Barrett A, Kraya AA, Anastopoulos IN, Yu S, Jiang Y, Chen H, Zhang N.R, Hackman N, D’Andrea K, Daber R, Morrissette JJD, Mitra N, Feldman M, Domchek SM, Nathanson KL. BRCA locus-specific loss of heterozygosity in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen-Dumont T, Pope BJ, Hammet F, Southey MC, Park DJ. A high-plex PCR approach for massively parallel sequencing. Biotechniques. 2013;55(2):69-74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17(5):405-424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryland GL, Doyle MA, Goode D, Boyle SE, Choong DY, Rowley SM, Li J; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Bowtell DD, Tothill RW, Campbell IG, Gorringe KL. Loss of heterozygosity: what is it good for? BMC. Med. Genomics. 2015;8:45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-015-0123-z.

  13. Shi SR, Cote RJ, Wu L, Liu C, Datar R, Shi Y, Liu D, Lim H, Taylor CR. DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen retrieval principle: heating under the influence of pH. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2002;50(8):1005-1011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang J, Lindroos A, Ollila S, Russell A, Marra G, Mueller H, Peltomaki P, Plasilova M, Heinimann K. Gene conversion is a frequent mechanism of inactivation of the wild-type allele in cancers from MLH1/MSH2 deletion carriers. Cancer Res. 2006;66(2):659-664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Kechin.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 165, No. 1, pp. 110-117, January, 2018

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kechin, A.A., Boyarskikh, U.A., Ermolenko, N.A. et al. Loss of Heterozygosity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Probability of Its Use for Clinical Classification of Variations. Bull Exp Biol Med 165, 94–100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-018-4107-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-018-4107-9

Key Words

Navigation