Skip to main content
Log in

Peptidyl Aldehyde Specifically Interacts with Immunosubunit β1i Proteasome: In Vitro and In Vivo Effects

  • MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

We studied the effect of β1i-specific peptidyl aldehyde IPSI-001 on proteasome from mammalian cells. In concentrations <1 μM, this agent effectively suppressed immunoproteasome, but only slightly reduced chymotrypsin-like activity of constitutive proteasome. Intraperitoneal administration of this inhibitor to C3H/He mice in a dose of 100 mg/kg induced no significant physiological or behavioral changes, which attested to its considerable therapeutic potential in the treatment of autoimmune neurodegenerative pathologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Basler, S. Mundt, T. Muchamuel, C. Moll, J. Jiang, M. Groettrup, and C. J. Kirk, Inhibition of the immunoproteasome ameliorates experimental autoimmuneencephalomyelitis. EMBO Mol. Med., 6, No. 2, 226-238 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Belogurov Jr, A. Kudriaeva, E. Kuzina, I. Smirnov, T. Bobik, N. Ponomarenko, Y. Kravtsova-Ivantsiv, A. Ciechanover, and A. Gabibov, Multiple sclerosis autoantigen myelin basic protein escapes control by ubiquitinationduring proteasomal degradation. J. Biol. Chem., 289, No. 25, 17,758-17,766 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Belogurov Jr, E. Kuzina, A. Kudriaeva, A. Kononikhin, S. Kovalchuk, Y. Surina, I. Smirnov, Y. Lomakin, A. Bacheva, A. Stepanov, Y. Karpova, Y. Lyupina, O. Kharybin, D. Melamed, N. Ponomarenko, N. Sharova, E. Nikolaev, and A. Gabibov, Ubiquitin-independent proteosomal degradation of myelin basic protein contributes todevelopment of neurodegenerative autoimmunity. FASEB J., 29, No. 5, 1901-1913 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Chapiro, S. Claverol, F. Piette, W. Ma, V. Stroobant, B. Guillaume, J. E. Gairin, S. Morel, O. Burlet-Schiltz, B. Monsarrat, T. Boon, and B. J. Van den Eynde, Destructive cleavage of antigenic peptides either by the immunoproteasome or by thestandard proteasome results in differential antigen presentation. J. Immunol., 176, No. 2, 1053-1061 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Chen, C. C. Norbury, Y. Cho, J. W. Yewdell, and J. R. Bennink, Immunoproteasomes shape immunodominance hierarchies of antiviral CD8(+) T cells at the levels of T cell repertoire and presentation of viral antigens. J. Exp. Med., 193, No. 11, 1319-1326 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Fissolo, M. Kraus, M. Reich, M. Ayturan, H. Overkleeft, C. Driessen, and R. Weissert, Dual inhibition of proteasomal and lysosomal proteolysis ameliorates autoimmunecentral nervous system inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol., 38, No. 9, 2401-2411 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M. H. Glickman and A. Ciechanover, The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake ofconstruction. Physiol. Rev., 82, No. 2, 373-428 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. J. Kuhn, S. A. Hunsucker, Q. Chen, P. M. Voorhees, M. Orlowski, and R. Z. Orlowski, Targeted inhibition of the immunoproteasome is a potent strategy against models of multiple myeloma that overcomes resistance to conventional drugs and nonspecific proteasome inhibitors. Blood, 113, No. 19, 4667-4676 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. E. S. Kuzina, E. L. Chernolovskaya, A. A. Kudriaeva, M. A. Zenkova, V. D Knorre., E. A. Surina, N. A. Ponomarenko, T. V Bobik., I. V. Smirnov, A. V Bacheva., A. A. Belogurov, A. G. Gabibov, and V. V. Vlasov, Immunoproteasome enhances intracellular proteolysis of myelin basic protein. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys., 453, 300-303 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Miller, L. Ao, K. B. Kim, and W. Lee, Inhibitors of the immunoproteasome: current status and future directions. Curr. Pharm. Des., 19, No. 22, 4140-4151 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Raule, F. Cerruti, N. Benaroudj, R. Migotti, J. Kikuchi, A. Bachi, A. Navon, G. Dittmar, and P. Cascio, PA28ab reduces size and increases hydrophilicity of 20S immunoproteasome peptideproducts. Chem. Biol., 21, No. 4, 470-480 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. K. L. Rock, C. Gramm, L. Rothstein, K. Clark, R. Stein, L. Dick, D. Hwang, and A. L. Goldberg, Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and thegeneration of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell, 78, No. 5, 761-771 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. E. J. Sijts and P. M. Kloetzel, The role of the proteasome in the generation of MHC class I ligands and immuneresponses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 68, No. 9, 1491-1502 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. C. L. Vanderlugt, S. M. Rahbe, P. J. Elliott, M. C. Dal Canto, S. D. Miller, Treatment of established relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with the proteasome inhibitor PS-519. J. Autoimmun., 14, No. 3, 205-211 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Belogurov Jr.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 161, No. 1, pp. 80-83, January, 2016

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuzina, E.S., Kudriaeva, A.A., Maltseva, D.V. et al. Peptidyl Aldehyde Specifically Interacts with Immunosubunit β1i Proteasome: In Vitro and In Vivo Effects. Bull Exp Biol Med 161, 69–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-016-3347-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-016-3347-9

Key Words

Navigation