Skip to main content
Log in

Local Tissue Reaction to Implantation of Biodegradable Suture Materials

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Morphological changes in tissues adjacent to the implant were studied 1, 2, 6, and 12 months after implantation of biodegradable suture materials (catgut thread, DemeTECH polyfilament thread, and Surgilactin monofilament thread) into subcutaneous fat of rats. Tissue reaction to implantation of different suture materials developed as usual in response to a wound process and to a foreign body. By the end of month 1. the stage of traumatic perifocal inflammation was replaced in all groups by the proliferative phase with formation of new vessels and connective tissue. A trend to reduction of the productive inflammation activity from month 1 to month 12 was noted. Complete degeneration of the material after 12 months with complete recovery of the histoarchitecture of the adjacent tissues (restitution) was detected only after implantation of DemeTECH polyfilament thread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. N. Bontsevich, Surgical Suturing Material [in Russian], Moscow (2005).

  2. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, Patol. Fiziol., No. 2, 63-71 (1989).

  3. I. V. Maiborodin, E. I. Maiborodina, N. V. Yakimova, et al., Arkh. Patol., 70, No. 2, 51-53 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A. N. Mayanskii and D. N. Mayanskii, Essays on the Neutrophil and Macrophage [in Russian], Novosibirsk (1989).

  5. A. I. Strukov and O. Ya. Kaufman, Granulomatous Inflammation and Granulomatous Diseases [in Russian], Moscow (1989).

  6. S. I. Tret’yak, E. V. Markevich, and A. V. Buravskii, Surgical Suturing Material [in Russian], Minsk (2011).

  7. V. N. Khromova, Med. Nauki, No. 10, Pt. 2, 400-402 (2011).

  8. J. A. Ascherman, C. J. Hunter, and D. R. Bickers, Ann. Plast. Surg., 56, No. 2, 205-207 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M. G. Dunn, P. N. Avasarala, and J. P. Zawadsky, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 27, No. 12, 1545-1552 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Hakimi, S. Chaudhury, R. Murphy, and A. Carr, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 100, No. 3, 685-692 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Murat Samli, M. Demirbas, C. Guler, and F. Aktepe, Int. Urol. Nephrol., 42, No. 4, 991-997 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A. E. Postlethwaite and A. H. Kang, Fibroblast, Ed. J. Gallin, New York (1988), pp. 577-597.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Maiborodina.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 157, No. 3, pp. 375-380, March, 2014

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuznetsova, I.V., Maiborodin, I.V., Shevela, A.I. et al. Local Tissue Reaction to Implantation of Biodegradable Suture Materials. Bull Exp Biol Med 157, 390–394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-014-2574-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-014-2574-1

Key Words

Navigation