Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Dopamine on Viability of BHK-21 Cells

  • Morphology and pathomorphology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

We studied the effects of dopamine added to culture medium on survival of floating or adherent BHK-21 cells differing by organization of actin cytoskeleton. The viability of floating cells more drastically decreased with increasing dopamine concentration and duration of exposure than that of adherent cells. The cells worse adhered to the substrate and formed a monolayer. The formed monolayer degrades, cell borders become blurred, cells, polygonal in the control, are rounded. Preliminary blockade of dopamine receptors with haloperidol, inessential for cell survival and morphology, does not prevent the destructive effect of dopamine on the cells. Ultrastructural study revealed increased density of filamentous actin threads in deep compartments of cell cytoplasm after dopamine treatment, this increase being more pronounced in cells grown in suspension. Bearing in mind the polymerizing effect of dopamine on globular actin in vitro and the fact that the content of this protein in floating cells is higher than in adherent cells, we can conclude that the decrease in viability of BHK-21 cells is caused by interaction of dopamine with cytoplasmic globular actin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. N. Bezgina, L. L. Pavlik, G. Z. Mikhailova, et al., Neirofiziologiya, 38, No. 4, 320–330 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. A. Kosenko, E. I. Lezhnev, I. I. Popova, et al., Kletoch. Kul’tury. Information Bulletin [in Russian], No. 24, P. 3–15 (2009).

  3. D. A. Moshkov, Neuron Adaptation and Ultrastructure [in Russian], Moscow (1985).

  4. L. L. Pavlik, E. S. Bezgina, N. R. Tiras, et al., Morfologiya, 125, No. 2, 26–31 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. L. Pavlik, P. A. Grigoryev, V. S. Shubina, et al., Biofizika, 53, No. 1, 66–72 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. V. S. Shubina, M. B. Abramova, V. P. Lavrovskaya, et al., Tsitologiya, 51, No. 12, 996–1004 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. S. Shubina, A. D. Sofin, V. P. Lavrovskaya, et al., Retseptsiya i Vnutrikletoch. Signaliz., 1, 401–406 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. S. Cantor, Biochemistry, 42, No. 41, 11,891–11,897 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Lázaro-Diéguez, C. Aguado, E. Mato, et al., J. Cell Sci., 121, Pt. 9, 1415–1425 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. P. S. Milutinovic, L. Yang, R. S. Cantor, et al., Anesth. Analg., 105, No. 2, 386–392 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Pedrosa and P. Soares-da-Siva, Br. J. Pharmacol., 137, No. 8, 1305–1313 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Ujihara, H. Miyazaki, and S. Wada, J. Physiol. Sci., 58, No. 7, 499–506 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. L. Vitale and M. E. Carbajal, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 52, No. 4, 517–527 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Moshkov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moshkov, D.A., Abramova, M.B., Shubina, V.S. et al. Effect of Dopamine on Viability of BHK-21 Cells. Bull Exp Biol Med 149, 359–363 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-010-0946-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-010-0946-8

Key Words

Navigation