Skip to main content
Log in

The use of bioactive wound dressing, stimulating epithelial regeneration of IIIa-degree burn wounds

  • Translated from Kletochnye Tekhnologii v Biologii i Meditsine (Cell Technologies in Biology and Medicine)
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Clinical and morphological comparison of wound healing after transplantation of living cultured allofibroblast on days 1–2 after the injury, collagen-1-based dressing with PDGF-BB, and traditional dressing with levomecol ointment showed that bioactive dressing accelerated wound epithelialization (5–7 days vs. 20–22 days with gauze dressing); the incidence of suppurative complications decreased, no crust formed, and epithelialization was not associated with the formation of a hypertrophic cicatrix. Biological dressing based on living cultured allofibroblasts and collagen-1 with PDGF-BB exhibited equal stimulatory effects on burn wound healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. V. Voronkina, N. V. Kalmykova, and G. P. Pinaev, Tsitologiya, 46, No. 4, 361–375 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Ermolov, S. V. Smirnov, V. B. Khvatov, et al., Skoraya Pomoshch', No. 3, 171–172 (2006).

  3. E. G. Kolokolchikova, L. I. Budkevich, A. E. Bobrovnikov, et al., Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 131, No. 1, 107–111 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Methodological Recommendations of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation “Method for Surgical Treatment of Burns in Children by Using Cultured Human Allofibroblasts”, Moscow (1997).

  5. D. S. Sarkisov, A. A. Alekseev, V. P. Tumanov, et al., New Methods for Treatment of Burns Using Cultured Allofibroblasts [in Russian], Saratov (1998), p. 31.

  6. M. Z. Aberdin and R. Riemschneider, Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 11, No. 1701, 107–122 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Alonso and E. Fuchs, PNAS, 100, Suppl. 1, 11,830–11,835 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. A. Clark, J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol., 19, No. 8, 693–706 (1993).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. el-Ghalbzouri, S. Gibbs, E. Lamme, et al., Brit. J. Dermatol., 147, No. 2, 230–243 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. K. Ghosh, Exp. Biol. Med., 227, No. 5, 301–314 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ito, Y. Liu, Z. Yang, et al., Nature Med., No. 11, 1351–1354 (2005).

  12. D. A. Lauffenburger and A. F. Horwitz, Cell, 84, No. 3, 359–369 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Li, J. Fan, M. Chen, et al., Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, No. 1, 294–309 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Libby and R. T. Lee, Circulation, 102, 1874–1876 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. F. Roufosse, N. C. Direkze, W. R. Otto, and N. A. Wright, Inter. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol., 36, 585–597 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Werner and R. Grose, Physiol. Rev., 83, 835–870 (2003).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Sychevsky.

Additional information

Translated from Kletochnye Tehnologii v Biologii i Medicine, No. 3, pp. 166–170, August, 2008

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ermolov, A.S., Smirnov, S.V., Khvatov, V.B. et al. The use of bioactive wound dressing, stimulating epithelial regeneration of IIIa-degree burn wounds. Bull Exp Biol Med 146, 153–157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-008-0225-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-008-0225-0

Key Words

Navigation