Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative analysis of differentiation and behavior of human neural and mesenchymal stem cells In Vitro and In Vivo

  • Translated from Kletochnye Tekhnologii v Biologii i Meditsine (Cell Technologies in Biology and Medicine)
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Comparative analysis of differentiation of human neural and mesenchymal stem cells in tissue culture and after transplantation into the brain was carried out using the same antibody set. Neural stem cells differentiated into all types of neural cells, are retained after transplantation, migrate, and form reciprocal relationships with the recipient brain. Mesenchymal stem cells were incapable of neural development under conditions of common culturing or after transplantation and retained the fibroblast-like status. Recipient filaments grew into mesenchymal stem cell transplants containing no neural cells due to local changes in the extracellular matrix at the site of transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. A. Azizi, D. Stokes, B. J. Augelli. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 95, 3908–3913 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. B. J. Cummings, N. Uchida, S. J. Tamaki, et al., Ibid., 102, No. 39, 14,069–14,074 (2005).

  3. M. Dezawa, H. Kano, M. Hoshino, et al., J. Clin. Invest., 113, No. 12, 1701–1710 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Jin, M. Xo, S. Batteur, et al., Ibid., 184, No. 1, 78–89 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kurozumi, K. Nakamura, T. Tamiya, et al., Mol. Ther., 11, No. 1, 96–104 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Long, M. Olszewski, W. Huang, et al., Stem Cells Dev., 14, No. 1, 65–69 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Lu, A. Blesch, and M. H. Tuszynski, J. Neurosci. Res., 77, No. 2, 174–191 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Lu, L. L. Jones, and M. H. Tuszynski, Exp. Neurol., 191, No. 2, 334–360.

  9. T. Magaki, K. Kurisu, T. Okazaki, Neurosci. Lett., 384, No. 3, 282–287 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Mahmood, D. Lu, and M. Chopp J., Neurotrauma, 21, No. 1, 33–39 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. J. Minguell, F. A. Fierro, M. J. Epunan, et al., Stem Cells Dev., 14, No. 4, 408–414 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Mori, J. Iwata, M. Miyazaki, et al., J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 25, No. 7, 887–898 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Munoz-Elias, A. J. Marcus, T. M. Coyne, et al., J. Neurosci., 24, No. 19, 4585–4595 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Neuhuber, G. Gallo, L. Howard, et al., J. Neurosci. Res., 77, No. 2, 192–204 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Neuhuber, B. Timothy Himes, J. S. Shumsky et al., Brain Res., 1035, No. 1, 73–85 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A. L. Pearlman and A. M. Sheppard, Prog. Brain Res., 108, 117–134 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. C. M. Sahlgren, A. Mikhailov, S. Vaittinen, et al., Mol. Cell Biol., 23, No 14, 5090–5106 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Tao, R. Rao, and D.D. Ma, Dev. Growth. Differ., 47, No. 6, 423–433 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Tondreau, L. Lagneaux, M. Dejeneffe, et al., Differentiation, 72, No. 7, 319–326 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Wang and R. Milner, J. Neurochem., 96, No. 1, 148–159 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Wehner, M. Bontert, I. Eyupoglu, et al., J. Neurosci., 23, No. 12, 5004–5011 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Wislet-Gendebien, F. Bruyere, G. Hans, et al., BMC Neurosci., 5, No. 1, 1–33 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Woodbury, E. J. Schwarz, D. J. Prockop, et al., J. Neurosci. Res., 61, No. 4, 364–370 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Chen, et al., Brain Res., 1030, No. 1, 19–27 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. L. R. Zhao, W. M. Duan, M. Reyes, et al., Exp. Neurol., 174, No. 1, 11–20 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Aleksandrova.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Kletochnye Tekhnologii v Biologii i Meditsine, No. 1, pp. 44–52, January, 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aleksandrova, M.A., Sukhikh, G.T., Chailakhyan, R.K. et al. Comparative analysis of differentiation and behavior of human neural and mesenchymal stem cells In Vitro and In Vivo . Bull Exp Biol Med 141, 152–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-006-0116-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-006-0116-1

Key Words

Navigation