Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Interpretation of Quantity Calculus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple interpretation of quantity calculus is given. Quantities are described as two-place functions from objects, states or processes (or some combination of them) into numbers that satisfy the mutual measurability property. Quantity calculus is based on a notational simplification of the concept of quantity. A key element of the simplification is that we consider units to be intentionally unspecified numbers that are measures of exactly specified objects, states or processes. This interpretation of quantity calculus combines all the advantages of calculating with numerical values (since the values of quantities are numbers, we can do with them everything we do with numbers) and all the advantages of calculating with standardly conceived quantities (calculus is invariant to the choice of units and has built-in dimensional analysis). This also shows that the standard metaphysics and mathematics of quantities and their magnitudes is not needed for quantity calculus. At the end of the article, arguments are given that the concept of quantity as defined here is a pivotal concept in understanding the quantitative approach to nature. As an application of this interpretation of quantity calculus, an easy proof of dimensional homogeneity of physical laws is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These advantages and disadvantages of computing with numerical values are clearly seen in Bridgman’s book (Bridgman 1922), which alternates masterful parts, where numerical values are important, and burdened parts, when units of measure must be included in the discussion.

References

  • Audi R (2015) editor, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press

  • Balashov Y (1999) Zero-value physical quantities. Synthese 119(3):253–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman Percy Williams (1922) Dimensional analysis. Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta Shamik (2013) Absolutism vs comparativism about quantity. Oxford Stud Metaphys 8:105–150

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer J (1995) On the history of quantity calculus and the international system. Metrologia 31 405–429

  • Eddon M (2013) Quantitative properties. Philos Compass 8(7):633–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein Albert (1936) Physics and reality. J Franklin Inst 221(36):349–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JCGM 200 (2012) The international vocabulary of metrology —basic and general concepts and associated terms VIM), 3rd edn. International Bureau for Weights and Measures

  • Scott D, Suppes P (1958) Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. J Symb Logic 23(2):113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (1951) A set of independent axioms for extensive quantities. Port Math 10(4):163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (2002) Representational measurement theory. In: Wixted J, Pashler H (eds) Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallot J (1926) Dimensionen, einheiten, massysteme. Springer, In Handbuch der Physik II

  • Wallot J (1957) Grössengleichungen. Einheiten und Dimensionen, Barth

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Čulina.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

“Entities are not to be multiplied without necessity.” – attributed to William of Ockham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Čulina, B. A Simple Interpretation of Quantity Calculus. Axiomathes 32 (Suppl 2), 393–403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09609-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09609-9

Keywords

Navigation