Advertisement

Axiomathes

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 355–374 | Cite as

A Geographical Taxonomy for Geo-ontologies

  • Timothy TambassiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 494 Downloads

Abstract

This article intends to provide an overview on the philosophical and geographical background of geo-ontologies and to propose a geographical classification of these ontologies, in response to their increasing diffusion within the contemporary debate. Accordingly, the first two paragraphs are devoted to offer a short introduction to the ontological turn in philosophy and to the development of the ontology of geography, that is that part of the (philosophical) ontology mainly focused on geographic entities and their boundaries, spatial representation, meretopological relations and location. As a second step, this preliminary analysis is taken to be a helpful device in showing some philosophical tools useful for geo-ontologies and in determining whether and what geographical sub-areas can be identified from non-professional geographers. Consequently, paragraphs three and four investigate the emerging of geo-ontologies from the spatial turn and their general aims. Part of this inquiry is dedicated to show some taxonomies derived from the domain of computer and information science and to underline the absence of a classification suitable for spreading geo-ontologies in the geographical debate. As it is, the fifth paragraph is concerned with a taxonomy for geo-ontologies grounded on some fundamental geographical distinctions. The basic idea is that such a taxonomy might best introduce geo-ontologies to the geographical debate that, in turn, might deeply influence the advancement of these ontologies in terms of conceptualizations and trace gradually the guidelines for a classification, in which the development of geo-ontologies would follow all the different sub-disciplines within the same geography.

Keywords

Geo-ontologies Ontology of geography Geography Ontological turn Spatial turn 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Parts of this article draw on previous material. In particular, Sects. 1 and 2 have some overlaps with Tambassi (2016) while Sect. 5 has some overlaps with Tambassi and Magro (2015) and Tambassi (2016). Thanks are due to Maurizio Lana, Giulia Lasagni, Diego Magro and Achille Varzi for providing comments and feedback, and for their invaluable support.

References

  1. Abdelmoty AI, Smart PD, Jones CB (2005) A critical evaluation of ontology languages for geographic information retrieval on the internet. J Vis Lang Comput 16(4):331–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battle R, Kolas D (2012) Enabling the geospatial semantic web with parliament and GeoSPARQL. Semant Web 3(4):355–370Google Scholar
  3. Benjamins VR, Gómez-Pérez A (1999) Knowledge-system technology: ontologies and problem-solving methods. Department of Social Science Informatics, University of Amsterdam. http://hcs.science.uva.nl/usr/richard/pdf/kais.pdf
  4. Bernaras A, Laresgoiti I, Corera J (1996) Building and reusing ontologies for electrical network applications. Proceedings of the European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI_96). Budapest, Hungary, pp 298–302Google Scholar
  5. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am 284:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishr Y (2007) Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability: seven years on. In: Fischer P (ed) Classics from IJGIS. Twenty years of the international journal of geographical information science and systems. CRC Press, Boca-RatonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishr YA, Kuhn W (2000) Ontology-based modelling of geospatial information. In: Ostman A, Gould M, Sarjakoski T (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd AGILE conference on geographic information science. Helsinki, 25–27 May 2000, pp 24–27Google Scholar
  8. Bittner T, Winter S (1999) On ontology in image analysis in integrated spatial databases. In: Agouris P, Stefanidis A (eds) Integrated spatial databases: digital images and GIS, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1737. Springer, Berlin, pp 168–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boll S et al (eds) (2008) LOCWEB’08: proceedings of the first international workshop on location and the web. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Borst WN (1997) Construction of engineering ontologies, Centre for Telematica and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. Buccella A, Perez L, Cechich A (2008) GeoMergeP: Supporting an ontological approach to geographic information integration. In: International conference of the chilean computer science society. http://disi.unitn.it/~p2p/RelatedWork/Matching/bucc-perbel-cech08p.pdf
  12. Bullinger A (2008) Innovation and ontologies. Structuring the early stages of innovation management. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  13. Câmara G, Monteiro A, Paiva J, Souza R (2000) Action-driven ontologies of the geographical space: Beyond the field-object debate. In: GIScience 2000—program of the first international conference on geographic information science Savannah, 28–31 October 2000, pp 52–54Google Scholar
  14. Casati R, Varzi AC (1999) Parts and Places. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Casati R, Smith B, Varzi AC (1998) Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation. In: Guarino N (ed) Formal ontology in information systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 77–85Google Scholar
  16. D’Agostini F (2002) Che cosa è la filosofia analitica? In: D’Agostini F, Vassallo N (eds) Storia della filosofia analitica. Einaudi, Torino, pp 3–76Google Scholar
  17. Egenhofer M, Mark DM (1995) Naive geography. In: Frank AU, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Proceedings of the second international conference. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  18. Euzenat J, Shvaiko P (2007) Ontology matching. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferraris M (ed) (2008) Storia dell’ontologia. Bompiani, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  20. Fikes R, Farquhar A (1999) Distributed repositories of highly expressive reusable ontologies. IEEE intell syst 14(2):73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank A (1997) Spatial ontology. In: Stock O (ed) Spatial and temporal reasoning. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frank A (2001) Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7):667–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galton A (2003) On the ontological status of geographical boundaries. In: Duckham M, Goodchild MG, Worboys MF (eds) Foundation of geographic information science. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geus K, Thiering M (2014) Common sense geography and mental modelling: setting the stage. In: Geus K, Thiering M (eds) Features of Common Sense Geography. Implicit knowledge structures in ancient geographical texts. LIT Verlag, WienGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson C (2009) Human geography. In: Kitchin R, Thrift N (eds) The international encyclopedia of human geography. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gómez-Pérez A, Fernández-López M, Corcho O (2004) Ontological engineering: with examples from the areas of knowledge management, E-commerce and the semantic web. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodchild M (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/position/Goodchild_VGI2007.pdf
  28. Goy A, Magro D (2015) What are ontologies useful for? In: Encyclopedia of information science and technology, IGI Global, pp 7456–7464Google Scholar
  29. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5(2):199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS’98. Trento, Italy. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 06–08 June 1998, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  31. Guarino N, Giaretta P (1995) Ontologies and Knowledge bases—towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars NJ (ed) Towards very large knowledge bases—knowledge building and knowledge sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  32. Hudson-Smith A, Crooks A (2008) The renaissance of geographic information: neogeography, gaming and second life. CASA working paper 142, centre for advanced spatial analysis, University College London, London. http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/casa/pdf/paper142.pdf
  33. Janowicz K (2006) Sim-dl: towards a semantic similarity measurement theory for the description logic CNR in geographic information retrieval. OTM Workshops 2:1681–1692Google Scholar
  34. Jaziri W, Gargouri F (2010) Ontology theory, management and design: an Overview and Future Directions. In: Gargouri F, Jaziri W (eds) Ontology theory, management and design: advanced tools and models. Information Science Reference, Hershey (PA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kavouras M, Kokla M, Tomai E (2005) Comparing categories among geographic ontologies. Comput Geosci 31(2):145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khun W (2005) Geospatial semantics: why, of what, and how ? In: Spaccapietra S, Zimányi E (eds) Journal on data semantics, vol 3. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  37. Kuhn W (2001) Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7):613–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kyzirakos K, Vlachopoulos I, Savva D, Manegold S, Koubarakis M (2014) GeoTriples: a tool for publishing geospatial data as RDF graphs using R2RML mappings. In: Proceedings of the 13th international semantic web conference, poster and demonstration track, pp 393–396Google Scholar
  39. Lassila O, McGuinness DL (2001) The Role of frame-based representation on the semantic web. Technical Report Knowledge Systems Laboratory. No. 01-02, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Mark DM (1993) Toward a theoretical framework for geographic entity types. In: Frank A, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory, Lectures Notes in Computer Science, vol 716. Springer, Berlin, pp 270–283Google Scholar
  41. Mark DM, Smith B, Tversky B (1999) Ontology and geographic objects: an empirical study of cognitive categorization. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory. cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. International conference COSIT’99 Stade, Germany, Proceedings, 25–29 August 1999, Springer, Berlin, pp 283–298Google Scholar
  42. Martin CB, Heil J (1999) The ontological turn. In: French PA, Wettstein HK (eds) New directions in philosophy, midwest studies in philosophy, vol 23, pp 34–60Google Scholar
  43. Mentzas G (2002) Knowledge asset management: beyond the process-centered and productcentered approaches. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Mizoguchi R (2003) Tutorial on ontological engineering: part 01: introduction to ontological engineering. New Gener Comput 21(4):365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mizoguchi R, Vanwelkenhuysen J, Ikeda M (1995) Task ontology for reuse of problem solving knowledge. In: Mars NJ (ed) Towards very large knowledge bases—knowledge building and knowledge sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 46–57Google Scholar
  46. Neches R, Fikes RE, Finin T, Gruber TR, Senator T, Swartout WR (1991) Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Mag 12(3):36–56Google Scholar
  47. Noy NF, McGuinness DL (2003) Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University, Stanford (CA)Google Scholar
  48. Pâslaru-Bontaş E (2007) A contextual approach to ontology reuse. Methodology, methods and tools for the semantic web, Ph.D. thesis. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freien Universitat, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  49. Pattinson WD (1963) The four traditions of geography. J Geogr 63(5):211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perry M, Herring J (eds) (2012) OGC GeoSPARQL—a geographic query language for RDF data. OGC© StandardGoogle Scholar
  51. Ressler J, Dean M, Kolas D (2010) Geospatial ontology trade study. In: Obrst L, Janssen T, Ceusters W (eds) Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodrìguez M, Egenhofer M (2004) Comparing geospatial entity classes: an asymmetric and context-dependent similarity measure. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18(3):229–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodríguez A, Egenhofer M, Rugg R (1999) Assessing semantic similarity among geospatial feature class definitions. In: Vckovski A, Brassel K, Schek H-J (eds) Interoperating geographic information systems (second international conference, INTEROP’99, Zurich, 10–12 March 1999), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1580. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  54. Runggaldier E, Kanzian C (1998) Grundprobleme der analytischen ontologie. Verlag Ferdinand Schöning, PaderbornGoogle Scholar
  55. Sala M (2009) Geography. In: Sala M (ed) Geography. Encyclopedia of life support systems. EOLSS Publisher, Oxford, pp 1–56Google Scholar
  56. Simons P (1987) Parts: an essay in ontology. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith B (1994) Fiat objects. In: Guarino N, Pribbenow S, Vieu L (eds) Parts and wholes: conceptual part-whole relations and formal mereology. Proceedings of the ECAI94 workshop. ECCAI, Amsterdam pp 15–23Google Scholar
  58. Smith B (1995) On drawing lines on a map. In: Frank A, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory—a theoretical basis for gis. proceedings, international conference Cosit’95, Semmering, Austria, September 21–23, 1995, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 988, Berlin, Springer, pp 475–484Google Scholar
  59. Smith B (1996) Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Knowl Eng 20:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith B (2004) Ontology. In: Floridi L (ed) The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Blackwell, Malden, pp 155–166Google Scholar
  61. Smith B, Mark DM (1998) Ontology and geographic kinds. In: Poiker TK, Chrisman N (eds) Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on spatial data handling. International Geographical Union, Burnaby, British Columbia, pp 308–320Google Scholar
  62. Smith B, Mark DM (2001) Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7): 591–612. http://idwebhost-202-147.ethz.ch/Courses/geog231/SmithMark_GeographicalCategories_IJGIS2001@2005-10-19T07%3B30%3B52.pdf
  63. Smith B, Varzi AC (2000) Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philos Phenomenol Res 60(2):401–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sowa JF (2000) Guided tour of ontology. http://www.jfsowa.com/ontology/guided.htm
  65. Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. IEEE Trans Data Knowl Eng 25(1–2):161–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swartout B, Ramesh P, Knight K, Russ T (1997) Toward distributed use of large-scale ontologies. In: AAAI symposium on ontological engineering, Stanford (CA)Google Scholar
  67. Tambassi T (2016) Rethinking geo-ontologies from a philosophical point of view. J Read (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  68. Tambassi T, Magro D (2015) Ontologie informatiche della geografia. Una sistematizzazione del dibattito contemporaneo. Rivista di Estetica 58:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Turner AJ (2006) Introduction to NeoGeography, Sebastopol (CA), O’Reilly Media Inc. http://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/sites/pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/files/Introduction_to_Neogeography.pdf
  70. Uschold M, Grueninger M (1996) Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Technical report of the artificial intelligence applications institute, No. 191. Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  71. Uschold M, Jasper R (1999) A framework for understanding and classifying ontology applications. Proceedings of the IJCAI99 workshop on ontologies and problem-solving method. Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  72. van Heijst G, van der Spek R, Kruizinga E (1996) Organizing corporate memories. In: Gaines B, Musen MA (eds) Tenth knowledge acquisition for knowledge-based systems workshop (KAW 96). Banff, Canada, 9–14 Nov 1996, pp 42.1–42.17Google Scholar
  73. Varzi AC (2005) Ontologia. Rome-Bari, LaterzaGoogle Scholar
  74. Varzi AC (2007) Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes and location. In: Aiello M, Pratt-Hartmann I, van Benthem J (eds) Handbook of spatial logics. Springer, Berlin, pp 945–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Varzi AC (2011) On doing ontology without metaphysics. Philos Perspect 25:407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Visser U (2004) Intelligent information integration for the semantic web. In: Lecture notes computer science, vol 3159, Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  77. Warf B, Arias S (eds) (2009) The spatial turn interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Research Institute of the University of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations