Axiomathes

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 107–116 | Cite as

Reductionism, Agency and Free Will

Original Paper

Abstract

In the context of the free will debate, both compatibilists and event-causal libertarians consider that the agent’s mental states and events are what directly causes her decision to act. However, according to the ‘disappearing agent’ objection, if the agent is nothing over and above her physical and mental components, which ultimately bring about her decision, and that decision remains undetermined up to the moment when it is made, then it is a chancy and uncontrolled event. According to agent-causalism, this sort of problem can be overcome if one realizes that the agent herself, as an irreducible substance, is the true originator of her actions. I’ll present arguments that favor this view. Event-causalists have countered that if the agent identifies with some of the inner states that play the self-determining causal role in bringing about the action, then it is as though the action was directly caused by herself. I’ll object that this is not a distinctive aspect of free agency. Agent-causalism has been criticized from most naturalistically inclined fronts, and it must address risks of implausibility, contradiction and unintelligibility. Even though I’ll acknowledge these challenges, I’ll still argue that libertarian free will cannot be defended by any reductionist alternative, and that agent-causalism does not conflict with contemporary science but only with some of its unproven assumptions.

Keywords

Agent-causalism Event-causalism Reductionism Free will Libertarianism Substance-causation 

References

  1. Bishop RC (2010) Free will and the causal closure of physics. In: Chiao RY, Cohen ML, Leggett AJ, Phillips WD, Harper CL (eds) Visions of discovery: new light on physics, cosmology, and consciousness. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratman M (2005) Planning agency, autonomous agency. In: Taylor JS (ed) Personal autonomy. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke R (2003) Libertarian accounts of free will. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke R (n.d.) “Powers, causes and free will”, presented at the freedom and responsibility Conference at the Queens College, Oxford (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Dupré H (2001) Human nature and the limits of science. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekstrom LW (2000) Free will. A philosophical study. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankfurt H (1971) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. J Philos 68:5–20Google Scholar
  8. Franklin C (2013a) Event-causal libertarianism, functional reduction, and the disappearing agent argument. Philos Stud 1–20Google Scholar
  9. Franklin C (2013b) Agent-causation, explanation, and Akrasia: a reply to Levy’s Hard Luck. Crim Law Philos 1–18Google Scholar
  10. Franklin C (2014) Bratman on identity over time and identification at a time, conference at the APA Central division meeting in ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Franklin C (forthcoming) Everyone thinks that an ability to do otherwise is necessary for free will and moral responsibility. Philos StudGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffith M (2010) Why agent-caused actions are not lucky. Am Philos Q 47(1):43–56Google Scholar
  13. Hasker W (1999) The emergent self. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kane R (ed) (2002) The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Lipton P (1990) Contrastive explanation. In: Knowles D (ed) Explanation and its limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 247–266Google Scholar
  16. Lowe EJ (2008) Personal agency. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murphy N, Brown W (2007) Did my neurons make me do it?. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nahmias E, Murray D (2010) Experimental philosophy on free will: an error theory for incompatibilist intuitions. In: Aguilar J, Buckareff A, Frankish K (ed) New waves in philosophy of action. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  19. Nahmias E, Morris SG, Nadelhoffer T, Turner J (2005) Surveying freedom: folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. Philos Psychol 18:561–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nahmias E, Morris SG, Nadelhoffer T, Turner J (2006) Is incompatibilism intuitive? Philos Phenomenol Res 73:28–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nahmias E, Coates J, Kvaran T (2007) Free will, moral responsibility, and mechanism: experiments on folk intuitions. In: Midwest studies in philosophy. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Connor T (2000) Persons and causes. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Olson E (2007) What are we? A study in personal ontology. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pereboom D (2004) Is our conception of agent-causation coherent? Philos Topics 32:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pereboom D (2014) The disappearing agent objection to event-causal Libertarianism. Philos Stud 169:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pereboom D et al (2007) Four views on free will. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Popper K, Eccles JC (1977) The self and its brain: an argument for interaccionism. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roskies A (2006) Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends Cogn Sci 10(9):419–423Google Scholar
  29. Searle JR (2001) Rationality in action. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Steward H (2012) A metaphysics for freedom. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Inwagen (1983) An essay on free will. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Velleman JD (1992) What happens when someone acts? Mind 101:461–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson G (1982) Free Agency. In: Watson G (ed) Free Will, Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Philosophy of Sciences of the University of LisbonUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations