Axiomathes

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 121–133 | Cite as

Husserl and the Algebra of Logic: Husserl’s 1896 Lectures

Invited paper

Abstract

In his 1896 lecture course on logic–reportedly a blueprint for the Prolegomena to Pure Logic–Husserl develops an explicit account of logic as an independent and purely theoretical discipline. According to Husserl, such a theory is needed for the foundations of logic (in a more general sense) to avoid psychologism in logic. The present paper shows that Husserl’s conception of logic (in a strict sense) belongs to the algebra of logic tradition. Husserl’s conception is modeled after arithmetic, and respectively logical inferences are viewed as analogical to arithmetical calculation. The paper ends with an examination of Husserl’s involvement with the key characters of the algebra of logic tradition. It is concluded that Ernst Schröder, but presumably also Hermann and Robert Grassmann influenced Husserl most in his turn away from psychologism.

Keywords

Husserl’s 1896 lectures Idea of logic Algebra of logic Psychologism Ernst Schröder Hermann Grassmann Robert Grassmann 

References

  1. Beyer C (1996) Von Bolzano zu Husserl. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Centrone S (2010) Logic and philosophy of mathematics in the early Husserl. Synthese Library, vol 345. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Grassmann R (1872) Die Formenlehre oder Mathematik. StettinGoogle Scholar
  4. Husserl E (1891) Philosophy of arithmetic. (trans: Willard D), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003Google Scholar
  5. Husserl E (1994a) Briefwechsel. Band VI. Philosophenbriefe. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Husserl E (1994b) Briefwechsel. Band VII. Wissenschaftlerkorrespondenz. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Husserl E (1994c) Early writings in the philosophy of logic and mathematics. (trans: Willard D), Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  8. Husserl E (2001a) Logik. Vorlesung 1896. In: von Elisabeth Schuhmann (hg) Husserliana Materialienbände, BD. I. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. Husserl E (2001b) Logical investigations (trans: Findlay JN), Moran D (ed), vol I. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller PJ (1982) Numbers in presence and absence: a study of Husserl’s philosophy of mathematics. Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohanty JN (2008) The philosophy of Edmund Husserl. A historical development. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  12. Peckhaus V (1996) The influence of Hermann Günther Grassmann and Robert Grassmann on Ernst Schröder’s algebra of logic. In: Schubring G (ed) Hermann Günther Graβmann (1809–1877): visionary mathematician, scientist and neohumanist scholar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 217–227Google Scholar
  13. Peckhaus V (2004a) Schröder’s logic. In: Gabbay DM, Woods J (eds) Handbook of the history of logic, vol 3. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pp 557–609Google Scholar
  14. Peckhaus V (2004b) Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited. Hist Philos Logic 25:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rollinger R (2003) Husserl’s elementary logic. The 1896 lectures in their nineteenth century context. Studia Phaenomenologica 3(1–2):195–213Google Scholar
  16. Schuhmann K (1977) Husserl-Chronik. Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Heijenoort J (1967a) From Frege to Gödel, a source book in mathematical logic 1879–1931. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Heijenoort J (1967b) Logic as calculus and logic as language. Synthese 17:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations