In this article I present and (modestly) defend a hybrid position which we may call a Platonist constituent ontology. More specifically, I present a version of exemplification which entails (1) a certain form of Platonism, (2) a constituent ontology of ordinary objects, (3) a view of exemplification as a “tiedto” nexus, and (4) a view of properties as abstract objects that are non-spatially “in” ordinary objects. I clarify two sets of preliminary issues, present my hybrid analysis of exemplification, raise and seek to undercut an argument against my constituent realism, and surface some of the costs and benefits relevant to assessing the relative merits of relational versus constituent realism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See Moreland (2001).
See Garcia (2009).
Garcia, p. 42.
Garcia, p. 56.
See Moreland, Universals, pp. 53–73, 83–96.
LI Vol. I, pp. 332, 337, 340; LI Vol. II, pp. 441, 446–447, 453; Ideas I, pp. 7–8. Cf. LI Vol. II, pp. 773–815.
LI Vol. I, pp. 340, 357, 361, 379; Ideas I, p. xxi.
LI Vol. I, pp. 337, 340, 357, 389, 390–391.
LI Vol. I, pp. 337, 357, 383.
LI Vol. I, pp. 337, 339–340, 357, 377, 379; LI Vol II, p. 482; Ideas I, pp. 8, 25.
Ideas I, pp. 39–40.
Armstrong DM (1989) Universals: an opinionated introduction. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 76–77; cf. pp 75–82
Garcia R (2009) Nominalist constituent ontologies: a development and critique. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Gould P (2010) A defense of platonic theism. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University
Husserl E (1970) Logical investigations (trans 2nd edn: Findlay JN) Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Husserl E (1982) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomonological philosophy. First book: general introduction to a pure phenomenology (trans: F Kersten Nijhoff). The Hague
Loux M (2006) Aristotle’s constituent ontology. In: Zimmerman D (ed) Oxford studies in metaphysics, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 206–250
Moreland JP (1989) Keith campbell and the trope view of predication. Australasian J Philos 67:379–393
Moreland JP (1997) A critique of campbell’s refurbished nominalism. Southern J Philos 35:225–246
Moreland P (2001) Universals. Bucks, Great Britain, Acumen Press Canada, McGill-Queen’s University Press
Moreland JP (2002) Naturalism, nominalism, and Husserlian moments. Mod Schoolman 79:199–216
Moreland JP, Pickavance T (2003) Bare particulars and individuation: reply to Mertz. Australasian J Philos 81:1–13
Wolterstorff N (1970) Bergmann’s constituent ontology. Nous 4:109–134
I wish to thank Paul Gould and Dallas Willard for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Moreland, J.P. Exemplification and Constituent Realism: A Clarification and Modest Defense. Axiomathes 23, 247–259 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9148-x
- Constituent ontology