Non-Classical Correlations in Bistable Perception?
- 96 Downloads
A violation of Bell’s inequalities is generally considered to be the Holy Grail of experimental proof that a specific natural phenomenon cannot be explained in a classical framework and is based on a non-boolean structure of predications. Generalized quantum theory allows for such non-boolean predications. We formulate temporal Bell’s inequalities for cognitive two-state systems and indicate how these inequalities can be tested. This will introduce the notion of temporally non-local measurements. The Necker-Zeno model for bistable perception predicts a violation of these temporal Bell’s inequalities.
KeywordsNecker-Zeno model Bistable perception Bell inequalities
- Atmanspacher H (1992) Categoreal and acategoreal representation of knowledge. Cogn Syst 3:259–288Google Scholar
- Atmanspacher H, Filk T, Römer H (2006) Weak quantum theory: formal framework and selected applications. In: Adenier G (ed) Quantum theory: reconsideration of foundations—3. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 34–46Google Scholar
- Atmanspacher H, Filk T, Römer H (2008b) Complementarity in bistable perception. In: Atmanspacher H, Primas H (eds) Recasting reality—Wolfgang Pauli’s philosophical ideas in contemporary science. Proceedings of the Pauli-conference, Ascona, May 2007, Springer, Berlin, pp 135–150Google Scholar
- Feil D, Atmanspacher H (2010) Acategorial states in a representational theory of mental processes. J Conscious Stud 17:72–101Google Scholar
- Gebser J (1986) The ever-present origin. Ohio University Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
- Giuntini R (1991) Quantum logic and hidden variables. BI-Wissenschaftsverlag, MannheimGoogle Scholar
- Mahler G (1994) Temporal Bell inequalities: a journey to the limits of “consistent histories”. In: Atmanspacher H, Dalenoort G (eds) Inside versus outside. Endo- and exo-concepts of observation and knowledge in physics, philosophy and cognitive science. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–205Google Scholar
- Necker LA (1832) Observations on some remarkable phenomenon which occurs in viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Lond Edinb Philos Mag J Sci 3:329–337Google Scholar