Skip to main content
Log in

Mobile manipulators for assisted living in residential settings

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a methodology for creating new technologies for assisted living in residential environments. The number of eldercare clients is expected to grow dramatically over the next decade as the baby boom generation approaches 65 years of age. The UMass/Smith ASSIST framework aims to alleviate the strain on centralized medical providers and community services as their clientele grow, reduce the delays in service, support independent living, and therefore, improve the quality of life for the up-coming elder population. We propose a closed loop methodology wherein innovative technical systems are field tested in assisted care facilities and analyzed by social scientists to create and refine residential systems for independent living. Our goal is to create technology that is embraced by clients, supports efficient delivery of support services, and facilitates social interactions with family and friends. We introduce a series of technologies that are currently under evaluation based on a distributed sensor network and a unique mobile manipulator (MM) concept. The mobile manipulator provides client services and serves as an embodied interface for remote service providers. As a result, a wide range of cost-effective eldercare applications can be devised, several of which are introduced in this paper. We illustrate tools for social interfaces, interfaces for community service and medical providers, and the capacity for autonomous assistance in the activities of daily living. These projects and others are being considered for field testing in the next cycle of ASSIST technology development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgar, C., Lum, P., Shor, P., & Van der Loos, H. (2000). Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 663–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, J., Brooke, T., & Beckwith, R. (2004). Vineyard computing: Sensor networks in agricultural production. Pervasive Computing, 3(1), 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, C. I., Burns, J. B., & Weiss, R. (1990). Path planning using Laplace’s equation. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on robotics and automation (Vol. 3, pp. 2102–2106).

  • Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2003). Practically relevant research: Capturing real world tasks, environments and outcomes. The Gerontologist, 43(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2002). CREATE: center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement. In R. Pieper, M. Vaarama, & J. L. Fozard (Eds.), Gerontechnology: Technology and aging—starting into the third millennium (pp. 54–61). Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1), 1–38.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duong, T. H., Bui, H., Phung, D., & Venkatesh, S. (2005). Activity recognition and abnormality detection with the switching hidden semi-Markov model. In IEEE international conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.

  • Eschenauer, L., & Gligor, V. D. (2002). A key-management scheme for distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on computer and communications security (pp. 41–47).

  • Fuller, G. (2000). Falls in the elderly. American Family Physician, 61(7), 2159–68, 2173–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, D., Govindan, R., Shenker, S., & Estrin, D. (2001). Highly-resilient, energy-efficient multipath routing in wireless sensor networks. In Mobile computing and communications review (Vol. 4(5)).

  • Gist, Y. I., & Hetzel, L. (2004). We the people: Aging in the US. US Census Bureau 2000, special reports, US Census Bureau series LENSR-19.

  • Haigh, K. Z., Kiff, L. M., & Ho, G. (2006). The independent lifestyle assistant: Lessons learned. Assistive Technology, 18(1), 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerink, M., Krose, B. J. A., Wielinga, B. J., & Evers, V. (2006). Human-robot user studies in eldercare: Lessons learned. In Proceedings of international conference on smart homes and health telematics.

  • Hobbs, F., & Stoops, N. (2002). Demographic trends in the 20th century. US Census Bureau, Census 2000, special reports, series CENSR-4.

  • Karuppiah, D., Grupen, R., Hanson, A., & Riseman, E. (2005). Smart resource reconfiguration by exploiting dynamics in perceptual tasks. In Proceedings of international conference on robotics and systems (IROS) (pp. 1513–1519).

  • Kassner, E. (2006). Home and community-based long-term services and supports for older people. AARP Public Policy Institute.

  • Koester, H. H. (2004). Usage, performance, and satisfaction outcomes for experienced users of automatic speech recognition. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(5), 739–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L., Fehr, H., & Jokisch, S. (2005). Aging, the world economy and the coming generational storm. National Center for Policy Analysis Study.

  • Kumar, V., Rus, D., & Singh, S. (2004). Robot and sensor networks for first responders. Pervasive Computing, 3(4), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, M., & Andreoletti, C. (2006). Strategy use mediates the relationship between control beliefs and memory performance for middle-aged and older adults. The Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, L. (1981). Rehabilitative robots. Robotics Age.

  • Li, D., Wong, K., Hu, Y. H., & Sayeed, A. (2002). Detection, classification and tracking of targets in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LifeLine. (2006). The lifeline medical alert service. http://www.lifeline.com.

  • Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Culler, D., & Anderson, J. (2002). Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In WSNA (pp. 88–97).

  • Martinez, K., Hart, J. K., & Ong, R. (2004). Environmental sensor networks. Computer, 37(8), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Y. L., Colditz, G. A., Coakley, E., & Kawachi, I. (1999). Health behaviors, social networks and healthy aging: Cross sectional evidence from the Nurses’ Health Study. Quality of Life Research, 8(8), 711–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A., Donamukkala, R., Kapuria, A., Steinfeld, A., Matthews, J. T., Dunar-Jacob, J., & Thrun, S. (2003). A robotic walker that provides guidance. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (Vol. 1, pp. 25–30).

  • Nair, V., & Clark, J. J. (2002). Automated visual surveillance using hidden Markov models. In The 15th vision interface conference (pp. 88–92).

  • Noury, N., Herve, T., Rialle, V., Virone, G., Mercier, E., Morey, G., Moro, A., & Porcheron, T. (2000). Monitoring behaviour in home using a smart fall sensor. In IEEE-EMBS special topic conference on microtechnologies in medicine and biology (pp. 607–610).

  • Osentoski, S., Manfredi, V., & and Mahadevan, S. (2004). Learning hierarchical models of activity. In IEEE/RSJ international conference on robots and systems (IROS).

  • Paro, X. (2006). The therapeutic robotic seal. http://paro.jp/english.

  • Pin, S., Guilley, E., Spini, D., & Lalive d’Epinay, C. (2005). The impact of social relationships on the maintenance of independence in advanced old age: findings of a Swiss longitudinal study. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 38(3), 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. E. (2002). Planning technology for intelligent cognitive orthotics. In 6th international conference on AI planning and scheduling (pp. 322–331).

  • Pollack, M. E., Engberg, S., Matthews, J., Thrun, S., Brown, L., Colbry, D., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Dunbar-Jacob, J., McCarthy, C., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., & Roy, N. (2002). Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In AAAI workshop on automation as eldercare.

  • Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2004). Psychological science and intelligent home technology. The Psychological Science Agenda, 18, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami, Y., Watanabe, R., Aoyama, C., Matsunaga, S., Higaki, N., & Fujimura, K. (2002). The intelligent ASIMO: System overview and integration. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp. 2478–2483).

  • Stiehl, W. D., Lieberman, J., Breazeal, C., Cooper, R., Knight, H., Lalla, L., Maymin, A., & Purchase, S. (2006). The huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In Proceedings of IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC2006).

  • Stroke-Association (2004). Faster identification means faster treatment. http://www.stroke.org.uk/.

  • Tanaka, F., & Suzuki, H. (2004). Dance interaction with QRIO: A case study for non-boring interaction by using an entrainment ensemble model. In Robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN.

  • Tapus, A., & Mataric, M. (2006). Towards socially assistive robotics. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan (JRSJ), 24(5).

  • Tapus, A., Mataric, M., & Scassellati, B. (2007). The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation magazine (RAM), Special Issue on Grand Challenges in Robotics.

  • Thibodeau, B. J., Deegan, P., & Grupen, R. (2006). Static analysis of contact forces with a mobile manipulator. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation.

  • Tinetti, M. (2003). Preventing falls in the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L., Fels, D., Treviranus, J., Smith, G., Spargo, D., & Eagleson, R. (1998). Control of a remote communications system by children—a user-centered design methodology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 22(4), 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., Xie, D., Ou, S., Grupen, R., Hanson, A., & Riseman, E. (2006). Distributed smart cameras for aging in place. In ACM SenSys workshop on distributed smart cameras.

  • Winner, S. (2007). Beam me inside, scotty! Assisted Living Consult.

  • Zarit, S., & Zarit, J. (1998). Mental disorders in older adults. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shichao Ou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deegan, P., Grupen, R., Hanson, A. et al. Mobile manipulators for assisted living in residential settings. Auton Robot 24, 179–192 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9061-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9061-8

Keywords

Navigation