Skip to main content
Log in

Solution of the Equations of Nuclide Kinetics

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

Many methods and computational programs are now available for solving burnup equations. Three fundamentally different approaches are combined in a single control program OpenBPS: solution of the nuclide kinetics equation by expansion of a matrix exponential, an iterative method with the possibility of analyzing uncertainties, and a direct analytical solution. The matrix exponential solution is obtained using the modern Chebyshev rational approximation method CRAM. An iterative method taking into account the errors of the initial data and data on decay and cross sections, made possible by an exponential representation of the increment of the nuclide concentration at the BPSE computational step, affords the possibility of analyzing the uncertainty of the nuclear concentration. An analytical computational method based on the use of modified Bateman functions, which is the basis of the ASBE computational code, was developed for the accelerated solution of the burnup equations. Using this program, a solution is obtained more than 100 times faster than the solution speed of programs based on the iterative method with high solution accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Bateman, “The solution of a system of differential equations occurring in the theory of radioactive transformations,” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 15, No. 5, 423–427 (1910).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Tasaka, DCHAIN: Code for Analysis of Build-up and Decay of Nuclides, JAERI 1250 (1977).

  3. E. F. Seleznev, Kinetics of Fast Reactors, Nauka, Moscow (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Pusa, “Rational approximations to the matrix exponential in burnup calculation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 169, No. 2, 155–167 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Isotalo and M. Pusa, Improving the Accuracy of the Chebyshev Rational Approximation Method (CRAM) by Using Substep, Finland (2015).

  6. P. Johansson, “Integral determination of the beta and gamma heat in thermal neutron induced fission of 235U and 239Pu, and of the gamma heat in fast fission of 238U,” in: Proc. of the Specialists Meeting on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Mito, Japan (1988), pp. 857–860.

  7. SCALE System Module to Calculate Fuel Depletion, Actinide Transmutation, Fission Product Buildup and Decay, and Association Source Terms, NUREG/CR-0200, Rev. 4 (1995), Vol. 2, Sec. F7. [S.1].

  8. A. L. Kochetkov, CARE ProgramCalculation of Isotopic Kinetics of Radiation and Environmental Characteristics of Nuclear Fuel On Irradiation and Hold-up, Preprint FEI-2431 (1995).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. F. Seleznev.

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 130, No. 5, pp. 249–253, May, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seleznev, E.F., Drobyshev, Y.Y., Karpov, S.A. et al. Solution of the Equations of Nuclide Kinetics. At Energy 130, 262–266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-021-00806-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-021-00806-8

Navigation