Skip to main content
Log in

Competitiveness Assessment of Regenerated Uranium-Plutonium Remix Fuel in Thermal Reactors

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

An economic and mathematical model has been developed to determine the competitiveness of REMIX-A and -C uranium-plutonium fuel obtained by reprocessing spent fuel from thermal reactors. The presented model makes it possible to calculate the cost metrics of nuclear fuel components and the fuel component of the cost of NPP electricity as a function of the cost metrics of key process changeovers. It is shown that as the market quotations for natural uranium and separation work increase, REMIX fuel becomes more competitive and, more importantly, all the more significant, the lower the cost of reprocessing spent fuel. However, even with zero cost of reprocessing the gain from the introduction of REMIX fuel does not exceed 25%. At the same time, its use allows a 20-fold reduction in the mass of radioactive waste going to final disposal, 24% (REMIX-A) to 36% (REMIX-C) savings of natural uranium, and 8–18% of separation work (REMIX-A) as well as 18% (REMIX-A) to 40% (REMIX-C) reduction in the accumulation of depleted uranium hexafluoride.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 2019 Annual Report of Atomenergoprom, Atomenergoprom, Moscow (2020).

  2. A. P. Solovyeva, Y. A. Uliyanin, V. V. Kharitonov, and D. Y. Iurshina, “The value of spent nuclear fuel as a raw material for thermal reactor fuel,” Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Yad. Energet., No. 2, 140–150 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. G. Pavlov, Yu. A. Ulyanin, D. A. Lazarev, and V. V. Kharitonov, “Efficacy of bringin depleted uranium into enrichment work,” At. Energ., 127, No. 1, 29–35 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. S. Fedorov, B. A. Bibichev, B. Y. Zilberman, and E. G. Kudryavcev, “Use of regenerated uranium and plutonium in thermal reactors,” At. Energ., 99, No. 2, 136–141 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. V. Kovalev, B. Ya. Zilberman, N. D. Goletskiy, and A. B. Sinyukhin, “New approach to spent nuclear fuel recycling for light water reactors in the REMIX framework,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Yad. Energet., No. 1, 67–77 (2020).

  6. V. M. Dekusar, V. S. Kagramanyan, A. G. Kalashnikov, et al., “Analysis of the characteristics of REMIX fuel with multiple recycling in VVER reactors,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Yad. Energet., No. 4, 109–117 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. N. Alekseev, E. A. Bobrov, P. S. Teplov, et al., “Multiple REMIX-fuel recycling with VVER-1000 operation in a closed fuel cycle,” Vopr. At. Nauki i Tekhniki. Ser. Fiz. Yad. Reakt., No. 4, 115–126 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Kharitonov, Nuclear Power Development Dynamics: Economic/Analytical Models, NRNU MEPhI, Moscow (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Kharitonov.

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 52–56, January, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matveenko, A.V., Kharitonov, V.V., Pavlov, Y.G. et al. Competitiveness Assessment of Regenerated Uranium-Plutonium Remix Fuel in Thermal Reactors. At Energy 130, 57–62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-021-00774-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-021-00774-z

Navigation