Advertisement

Atomic Energy

, Volume 124, Issue 5, pp 321–325 | Cite as

Optimization and Diagnostics Code for Technological Processes: Radiochemical Production Simulator

  • A. G. Goryunov
  • O. V. Egorova
  • K. A. Kozin
  • S. N. Liventsov
  • N. V. Liventsova
  • O. V. Shmidt
Article

A software-hardware complex with the possibility of simulating the functioning of technological processes with APCS in real and accelerated time is being developed as part of Project Breakthrough in order to determine the optimal operating regimes of the technological processes of the units in a closed nuclear fuel cycle. It makes possible monitoring and control functions and the visualization and archiving of the results of simulation, which makes it possible at the development stages of technologies to evaluate the degree of adherence to the requirements of the technological equipment, regulating organs and final-control mechanisms, measurement apparatus, and monitoring channels, to analyze the control and diagnostics algorithms, blocking and protection, and to make when necessary changes in the design being developed. The developed software-hardware complex is a stimulator that will make it possible not only to investigate process schemes with their corresponding algorithms but also to develop training complexes for the training and certification of service personnel.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Yu. Shadrin, K. N. Dvoeglazov, A. G. Maslennikov, et al., “RN process – reprocessing technology for processing mixed uranium-plutonium fuel of the BREST-OD-300 reactor,” Radiokhimiya, 58, No. 3, 234–241 (2016).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. A. Bolshov, N. A. Mosunova, V. F. Strizhov, and O. V. Shmidt, “Next-generation computational codes for new platform for nuclear power technology,” At. Energ., 120, No. 6, 303–312 (2016).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. V. Shmidt, S. G. Tretyakova, Yu. A. Evsyukova, et al., “VIZART software system for balance calculations of material flows of closed nuclear fuel cycle technologies,” At. Energ., 122, No. 2, 88–92 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. A. Chursin, A. H. Goryunov, S. N. Liventsov, et al., “Code concept for engineering optimization and diagnostics of fast reactors spent nuclear fuel reprocessing mixed technology,” Global’15, France, Sept. 20, 2015, pр. 5106– 5111.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Mckay, “Verify control systems before committing to hardware. Model-based design supports early verification, saving time and reducing costs while improving design quality and performance,” Electronic Des., 57, No. 20, 32–33 (2009).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Bisson, B. Dinh, P. Huron, et al., “PAREX, a numerical code in the service of la hague plant operations,” Procedia Chem., 21, 117–124 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. A. Zaitsev, A. A. Kazantsev, and A. A. Lukyanov, “Testing of the integrated software for modeling hypothetical accidents at the RU BN,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Yad. Energet., No. 2, 60–70 (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Goryunov
    • 1
  • O. V. Egorova
    • 1
  • K. A. Kozin
    • 1
  • S. N. Liventsov
    • 1
  • N. V. Liventsova
    • 1
  • O. V. Shmidt
    • 2
  1. 1.Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia
  2. 2.Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations