Atomic Energy

, Volume 121, Issue 3, pp 214–219 | Cite as

Radioecological Validation of the Extraction Parameters of Fission Products and Actinides from Spent Nuclear Fuel from the BREST-OD-300 Reactor

  • S. I. Spiridonov
  • A. N. Perevolotskii
  • R. M. Aleksakhin
  • E. V. Spirin
  • G. N. Vlaskin
Article
  • 18 Downloads

The aim of this work is to validate the extraction parameters of fission products and actinides from the spent nuclear reactor fuel of the BREST-OD-300 reactor on the basis of the concept of radio-ecological balance. The dose loads due to long-lived high-level wastes and natural uranium are compared for humans. Different variants of extraction of fissile materials U, Pu, and Np from spent fuel with residual content in the wastes 0.1–1% of the initial content and americium with residual content in the wastes 0.1–10% of the initial content with decay period of the spent fuel in the range 1–100 years were taken as initial data. It was found that for the indicated variants of reprocessing it is impossible to achieve radioecological balance for humans after 500 years without extracting 99Tc with residual content in the wastes not exceeding 5% of the initial content in the spent fuel. The time to achieve balance can be reduced to 300 years with additional extraction of 137Cs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. O. Adamov and I. Kh. Ganev, Ecologically Flawless Nuclear Power, NIKIET, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. O. Adamov, R. M. Aleksakhin, L. A. Bol’shov, et al., “Project Breakthrough – technological foundation for largescale nuclear power,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk., Energetika, No. 1, 5–12 (2015).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Lopatkin, V. I. Velichkin, B. V. Nikipelov, and P. P. Poluektov, “Radiation equivalence and nature similarity in radioactive waste management,” At. Energ., 92, No. 4, 308–317 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. V. Spirin, R. M. Aleksakhin, S. I. Spiridonov, et al., “The radiation balance of spent nuclear fuel from thermal reactors and the equivalent mass of uranium for native organisms,” At. Energ., 116, No. 6, 350–353 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. V. Spirin, R. M. Aleksakhin, G. N. Vlaskin, and S. S. Utkin, “The radiation balance of spent nuclear fuel fast reactor and native uranium,” At. Energ., 119, No. 2, 114–119 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. I. Spiridonov, “Prospects for systems radioecology in the solution of innovative problems of nuclear power,” Rad. Biol. Radiokhim., 54, No. 4, 415–422 (2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ORIGEN-ARP 2.00. Isotope Generation and Depletion Code System – Matrix Exponential Method with GUI and Graphics Capability, RSICC Code Package C00702PC58600, May 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. O. Adamov, I. H. Ganev, A. V. Lopatkin, et al., Transmutation Fuel Cycle in Large-Scale Nuclear Power Industry of Russia, NIKIET, Moscow (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. I. Spiridonov
    • 1
  • A. N. Perevolotskii
    • 1
  • R. M. Aleksakhin
    • 2
  • E. V. Spirin
    • 2
  • G. N. Vlaskin
    • 2
  1. 1.All-Russia Research Institute of Radiology and Agroecology (VNIIRAE)ObninskRussia
  2. 2.Innovation-Technology Center for Project Breakthrough (ITTsP Proryv)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations