Atomic Energy

, Volume 121, Issue 3, pp 203–207 | Cite as

Study of the Present-Day Geodynamics of the Nizhnekansk Massif for Safe Disposal of Radioactive Wastes

  • V. N. Tatarinov
  • V. I. Kaftan
  • I. N. Seelev
Article

The results of a study of the present-day motions of the Earth’s crust, using GPS/GLONASS satellite systems, within the Nizhnekansk massif (Krasnoyarsk krai), where the construction of an underground repository for the disposal of high-level radioactive wastes is planned. Observations conducted in 2010–2014 have provided new information about the regime of present-day motions at the junction of the largest tectonic structures region – the Siberian platform and West Siberian plate as unified parts having deep geodynamic force sources. On the whole, no anomalous values of present-day motions of the Earth’s crust, suggesting the presence of tectonic instability of the geological environment, have been recorded.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. B. Anderson, S. V. Belov, E. N. Kamnev, et al., Underground Disposal of Radioactive Wastes, Gornaya Kniga, Moscow (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. V. Belov, V. N. Morozov, V. N. Tatarinov, et al., “The study of the structure and geodynamic evolution of the Nizhne-Kan massif in connection with the disposal of radioactive wastes,” Geoekologiya, No. 2, 248–266 (2007).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Kaftan and A. V. Ustinov, “Increasing the accuracy of local geodynamic monitoring by means of the global navigation satellite systems,” Gornyi Zh., No. 10, 32–39 (2015).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. N. Morozov, S. V. Belov, M. Yu. Kolesnikov, et al., “Possibilities of geodynamic zoning in choosing locations for underground disposal of high-level radioactive wastes for the example of the Nizhnekansk massif,” Inzh. Ekol., No. 5, 17–25 (2008).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. N. Tatarinov, “Geodynamic safety at nuclear fuel cycle enterprises,” Byull. Ispolz. Okhrana Prirod. Res. Rossii, No. 1, 46–51 (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. N. Tatarinov, V. N. Morozov, I. Yu. Kolesnikov, and A. I. Kagan, “Kinematic method of geodynamic zoning in the design of development of deposits by underground methods,” Bezop. Zhiznedeyat., No. 7, 8–11 (2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. N. Tatarinov, E. G. Bugaev, T. A. Tatarinova, et al., “On the estimation of ground deformations from satellite observations,” Gornyi Zh., No. 10, 27–32 (2015).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. D. Gvishiani. S. V. Belov, V. N. Tatarinov, et al., “Methods of artificial intelligence in the evaluation of the tectonic stability of the Nizhnekansk massif,” Inzh. Ekol., No. 2, 3–14 (2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. N. Tatarinov
    • 1
  • V. I. Kaftan
    • 1
  • I. N. Seelev
    • 2
  1. 1.Geophysical CenterRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Mining and Chemical CombineZheleznogorskRussia

Personalised recommendations