Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Fuel Loads of Reactors in a Closed Fuel Cycle of Nuclear Power

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

The management of accumulated spent fuel is now an urgent problem. Questions concerning the need for reprocessing and subsequent isolation of high-level wastes are elucidated. It is shown that the BN-1200 and BREST fast reactors now under consideration for closing the fuel cycle do not permit efficient use of plutonium, because for the existing spent-fuel reprocessing technologies these reactors could be very expensive or a long cool-down time may be required, which will reduce the positive effect from closing the fuel cycle. The requirements of fast reactors that make fast reprocessing of spent fuel possible with the minimal environmental load on the fuel cycle are formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Technical Basis for Yucca Mountain Standards, National Academy Press, Washington (1995).

  2. A. Yu. Gagarinskii, V. V. Ignat’ev, N. N. Ponomarev-Stepnoi, et al., “Role of nuclear power in the structure of global electricity production in the 21st century,” At. Énerg., 99, No. 5, 323–335 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. A. Andrianova, V. D. Davidenko, and V. F. Tsibul’skii, “DESAU software for systems studies of the prospects for the development of nuclear power,” At. Énerg., 105, No. 6, 303–306 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nuclear Energy Development in the 21st Century: Global Scenarios and Regional Trends, IAEA, Vienna (2010).

  5. Uranium 2011: Resources, Production and Demand, OECD, NEA No. 7059 (2012).

  6. OST 95 745–2005, Spent Fuel Assemblies of Nuclear Power Reactors of the VVER Type. General Requirements for Delivery to Regeneration Plants, VNIPIET (2005).

  7. B. E. Burakov, B. Ya. Zil’berman, V. M. Poplavskii, et al., “Closure of the NFC of fast reactors using the Purex process,” Bezop. Yad. Tekhnol. Okr. Sredy, No. 1, 3–5 (2012).

  8. R. Schulten, W. Bellermann, H. Braun, et al., “Der Hochtemperaturreaktor von BBC/Krupp,” Atomwirtschaft, 9, 377–384 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Verfondern, H. Nabielek, M. Kania, and H.-J. Allelein, High-Quality Thorium TRISO Fuel Performance in HTGRs, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (2013).

  10. N. N. Ponomarev-Stepnoi, G. L. Lunin, A. G. Morozov, et al., “Light-water thorium reactor VVER-T,” At. Énerg., 85, No. 4, 263–277 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. M. Feinberg, “Gas-cooled breeder as an alternative to metal coolant: ideology of hard and soft spectra,” Leading Scientists of the Kurchatov Institute, Moscow (2011), pp. 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 118, No. 5, pp. 243–247, May, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andrianova, E.A., Davidenko, V.D. & Tsibul’skii, V.F. Prospective Fuel Loads of Reactors in a Closed Fuel Cycle of Nuclear Power. At Energy 118, 301–306 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-015-9997-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-015-9997-2

Keywords

Navigation