Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the State of Normative Regulation in the Management of Low-Level Wastes

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

It is shown on the basis of an analysis of regulatory-legal documents that the assumptions characterizing very low-level wastes contain semantic contradictions and critical discrepancies of a classification nature regarding wastes containing natural radionuclides and are not consistent with the absolute values of the bounding indices – the dose rates and specific activity. The presence of these uncertainties and inconsistencies in the regulatory documentation makes reaching the primary objective of introducing very low-level wastes as a category – reduction of the cost of managing wastes by lowering the requirements for their isolation – problematic. Some variants of the elimination of normalization shortfalls are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Classification of Radioactive Wastes, No. GSG-1, IAEA, Vienna (2009).

  2. SP 2.6.6.2572–2010, Radiation Safety Security in Managing NPP Commercial Wastes Containing Technogenic Radionuclides, Rospotrebnadzor, Moscow (2010).

  3. “On the criteria for classing solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes as radwastes, criteria for classing radwastes as special radwastes and disposable radwastes, and criteria for classing disposable radwastes,” in: Collection of the Laws of the Russian Federation, Oct. 29, 2012, No. 44, Art. 6017.

  4. “Tariffs for the disposal of radioactive wastes during the first period of regulation – Order No. 89, March 13, 2013, of the Ministry of the Environment of the Russian Federation,” Ross. Gazeta, June 5, 2013, No. 6095.

  5. SP 2.6.1.2612–10, Primary Sanitary Regulations for Securing Radiation Safety (OSPORB–99/2010), Ver. No. 1, appr. by Ruling No. 43, Sept. 16, 2013, of the Surgeon General of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Justice Reg. No. 30309, Oct. 15, 2013, Rospotrebnadzor, Moscow (2013).

  6. SP 2.6.6.1168–02, Sanitary Regulations for Managing Radwastes (OSPORO–2002), Ver. No. 2, appr. by Ruling No. 43, Sept. 16, 2013, of the Surgeon General of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Justice Reg. No. 30309, Oct. 15, 2013, Rospotrebnadzor, Moscow (2013).

  7. Commentary to the Federal Law On Managing Radwastes and Making Changes in Individual Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation, GD RF, Moscow (2014).

  8. “Federal Law On Managing Radwastes and Making Changes in Individual Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation, No. 190, July 11, 2011,” in: Collection of the Laws of the Russian Federation, July 18, 2011, No. 29, Art. 4281.

  9. IAEI-TECDOC-1322, Decommissioning Cosgts of WWER-440 Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA, Vienna (2002).

  10. “Acceptability criteria for radwastes for disposal,” Yad. Radiats. Bezopas., No. 1(7), 22–35 (2014).

  11. A. F. Nechaev and I. V. Smirnov, Economics of the Final Stage of the Life Cycle of Nuclear and Radiation Hazardous Objects, ID Infro Ol, St. Petersburg (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. F. Nechaev and A. S. Chugunov, “Motivation and possibilities of reducing the volume of radwastes,” At. Énerg., 115, No. 6, 318–320 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. P. Nassonov and A. F. Nechaev, “Economic aspects of the ‘neutralization’ of radwastes,” Izv. SPbGTI, No. 24(50), 93–97 (2014).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 118, No. 3, pp. 147–150, March, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nechaev, A.F. Analysis of the State of Normative Regulation in the Management of Low-Level Wastes. At Energy 118, 187–190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-015-9976-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-015-9976-7

Keywords

Navigation