Skip to main content
Log in

Integral Indices of the Radiological Effect of Open and Closed Fuel Cycle Objects on the General Population

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

The collective dose is examined as an integral characteristic of the radiological effect of nuclear fuel cycle enterprises on the general population. A relation is obtained for evaluating the ecological factor, which takes account of the specifics of radionuclides from the standpoint of their migration capacity and the particularities of dose load formation. The ecological factors are calculated for 241Am, 242mAm, 242Am, 243Am, 242Cm, 243Cm, 244Cm, 245Cm, 246Cm, 247Cm, 248Cm, 237Np, 238Pu, 239Pu, 240Pu, 241Pu, 242Pu, 244Pu, 235U, 236U, and 238U. Links where the activity of the daughter radionuclides was taken as equal to the activity of long-lived precursors are singled out in the decay chains of the actinides. The dynamics of the yearly collective dose for the general population, formed by individual actinides with activity 1 Bq in the emissions and their decay products, for a long period of time is calculated. The results are suitable for performing comparative radioecological assessments of enterprises in open and closed nuclear fuel cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. O. Adamov, A. V. Dzhalavyan, A. V. Lopatkin, et al., “Conceptual positions of the strategy for the development of nuclear power in Russia to 2100,” At. Énerg., 112, No. 6, 319–330 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Rachkov and S. G. Kalyakin, “Innovative nuclear technology – foundation of large-scale nuclear power,” Yad. Energet., No. 1, 5–13 (2014).

  3. R. M. Aleksakhin, “High-priority ecological problems of nuclear power,” At. Énerg., 114, No. 5, 243–249 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. N. Avrorin, E. O. Adamov, R. M. Aleksakhin, et al., Conceptual Positions of the Strategy for the Development of Nuclear Power of Russia in the 21st Century, NIKIET, Moscow (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. O. Adamov and I. Kh. Ganev, Ecologically Perfect Nuclear Power, NIKIET, Moscow (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. M. Aleksakhin, Nuclear Power and the Biosphere, Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. I. Kryshev and E. P. Ryazantsev, Ecological Safety of the Nuclear-Power Complex of Russia, IzdAT, Moscow (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. V. Spirin, S. I. Spiridonov, R. M. Aleksakhin, and S. S. Utkin, “Radioecological assessment of a uranium deposit for validation of the radiation-migration balance of long-lived wastes,” At. Énerg., 114, No. 1, 34–39 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. V. Spirin, R. M. Aleksakhin, S. I. Spiridonov, et al., “Radiation balance of spent nuclear fuel of thermal reactors and uranium equivalent mass for natural organisms,” At. Énerg., 116, No. 6, 350–353 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. I. Spiridonov, “Prospects for systems radioecology in the solution of innovative problems of nuclear power,” Rad. Biol. Radioekol., 54, No. 4, 415–422 (2014).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. S. I. Spiridonov, E. I. Karpenko, and L. A. Sharpan, “Ranking of radionuclides and irradiation pathways according to the contribution to the dose load on the population, formed as a result of atmospheric emissions from nuclear power plants,” Rad. Biol. Radioekol., 53, No. 4, 401–410 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. N. Sharpan, E. I. Karpenko, and S. I. Spiridonov, “Evaluation of the irradiation dose to the population as a result of the atmospheric emissions from the Rostov NPP,” At. Énerg., 115, No. 3, 163–166 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009): Sanitary Rules and Regulations SanPin 2.6.1.2523-09, Minzdrav Rossii, Moscow (2009).

  14. Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments, IAEA, Vienna (2009).

  15. Handbook of Parameter Values for Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments, IAEA, Vienna (2010).

  16. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. IAEA Safety Standards Series, IAEA, Vienna (2011).

  17. Generic Models for Use in Assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the Environment: Safety Reports Series No. 19, IAEA, Vienna (2001).

  18. V. P. Mashkovich, Handbook of Protection from Ionizing Radiation, Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1982), 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ionizing Radiation: Sources and Biological Effects, UNSCEAR, Report 1982 to the General Assembly, New York (1982), Vols. 1, 2.

  20. DOE Standard DOE-STD-1121–98, Internal Dosimetry, Washington, Department of Energy (1999).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 47–54, January, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spiridonov, S.I., Aleksakhin, R.M. & Spirin, E.V. Integral Indices of the Radiological Effect of Open and Closed Fuel Cycle Objects on the General Population. At Energy 118, 64–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-015-9957-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-015-9957-x

Keywords

Navigation