Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Effect of Different Types of Errors on the Accuracy of Calculations of the Number of Reactions in Individual Volumes of the Core of a Water Cooled and Moderated Power Reactor

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

A method and numerical algorithm for evaluating the computational errors in calculating the number of fission rates in small individual volumes of a reactor core, viz., fuel element, group of fuel elements, fuel assemblies, are presented. The standard error was determined by a combination of the methods of the statistical theory of errors and linear perturbation theory. An algorithm developed for calculating the value function, sensitivity coefficients, and errors of functionals which is based on the use of the MCCG3D, TRIFON, and ERRORJ software is described. The standard error, due to, for example, the relative error ~1% (over the volume of a fuel element) in the microscopic fission and total cross section, of the computed fission rate in the most stressed fuel element in fuel assembly No. 10 PWR (ALMARAZ II, Spain), is evaluated as an example. The standard error of the fission reactions in this case is εƒ,235U = 5.573·10–3, εƒ,239Pu = 1.193·10–3, i.e., the total error is ~0.67%. For other isotopes, it is hundredths of a percent, i.e., approximately equal to its computational error. For the technological error ±1.2% of the density of the loaded PWR uranium-dioxide fuel, the computed uncertainty in the number of fissions is ±0.93%, and for the uncertainty ±0.5% in the fuel enrichment the error in the number fissions will be ±1.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. In-Core Fuel Management Code Package Validation for PWRs, IAEA-TECDOC-815 (1995).

  2. S. N. Bukolov, A. D. Klimov, P. S. Teplov, and A. V. Chibinyaev, “Analysis of the computational results obtained for fuel burnup in the first two loads of a PWR reactor,” in Int. Conf. Safety of VVER-Type Reactors, OKB Gidropress, Podolsk (2011), pp. 95–99.

  3. B. P. Kochurov, A. Yu. Kwaratskheli, and V. M. Michajlov, Computer Code TRIFON: Manual, Preprint ITEP 10-95 (1995).

  4. I. R. Suslov, “MCCG3D-3D discrete ordinates transport code for unstructured grid/state of art and future development,” in: Neutronics-96, Physics and Power Engineering Institute, Obninsk (1996), pp. 106–199.

  5. ERRORJ – Covariance Processing Code Version 2.2: Manual, JNC TN9520-003 (2004).

  6. E. A. Ivanov, A. D. Krotov, V. B. Polevoi, et al., “Evaluation of a series of critical experiments on the BFS-40 assemblies,” Vopr. At. Nauki Tekhn. Ser. Yad. Konst., No. 1–2, 50–61 (2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 117, No. 3, pp. 123–127, September, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klimov, A.D., Suslov, I.R., Tormyshev, I.V. et al. Analysis of the Effect of Different Types of Errors on the Accuracy of Calculations of the Number of Reactions in Individual Volumes of the Core of a Water Cooled and Moderated Power Reactor. At Energy 117, 149–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-014-9903-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-014-9903-3

Keywords

Navigation