Methods of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of innovative designs based on price comparison (reduced costs) and profits (pure discounted income) are analyzed. The deficiencies of the methods, resulting in incorrect evaluations, are pointed out. Specifically, identifying (incorrectly) the discount rate with the commercial interest on capital can result in delays in adopting innovative designs in nuclear power. Replacing the criterion of minimum costs (reduced costs) by the criterion of maximum profit (discounted income) can result in unfounded overstatement of the cost-effectiveness. It is proposed that a profitability index of discounted investments be used, for all of the indicated methods, to eliminate these drawbacks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Methodological Recommendations for Evaluating the Profitability of Investments Projects, Ekonomika, Moscow (2000), 2nd edition.
Manual on Economics, Final Report of Phase I INPRO (2006).
A. N. Karkhov, “Problems of evaluating the profitability of investment projects for nuclear power plants and heat-and-electricity plants,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Energetika, No. 5, 85–95 (2005).
A. N. Karkhov, “On the methodology for evaluating the competitiveness of the designs of nuclear power plants and heat-and-electricity plants,” ibid., No. 6, 69–85 (2003).
A. N. Karkhov, “Cost-effectiveness of nuclear power and heat-and-electricity plants under market conditions,” ibid., No. 6, 69–85 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 107, No. 6, pp. 303–307, December, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karkhov, A.N. Methods for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of innovative projects in nuclear power. At Energy 107, 363–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-010-9237-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-010-9237-8