Skip to main content
Log in

Computational error in calculating reactivity effects in fast reactors and its effect on the assessment of the consequences of the main types of accidents (analysis of the IAEA test model)

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

Abstract

The results of calculations of reactivity effects and analysis of how the computational error affects the course of accidents which involve coolant-flow disturbances and reactivity increases are presented for an IAEA test model — the BN-600 reactor with a hybrid core. It is shown that the solution of the neutron transport equation in the diffusion approximation gives satisfactory accuracy in determining the main reactivity effects for the BN-600 reactor. The reactivity of sodium and steel calculated in the two-dimensional R, Z and three-dimensional HEX, Z geometries and analysis of its effect on the course of a loss-of-coolant accident show that a three-dimensional model gives a lower computational error and, correspondingly, a more accurate description of an accident. Comparative analysis of the results obtained in different countries demonstrated that the methods and programs developed in our country for safety substantiation of fast reactors are reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. N. Manturov, V. I. Matveev, M. N. Nikolaev, et al., “Requirements for the computational accuracy of the characteristics of breeder reactors and ways to satisfy them,” At. Énerg., 67, No. 3, 181–186 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Updated Codes and Method to Reduce the Calculational Uncertainties of the LFMR Reactivity Effects, IAEA-RC-803, IWGFR/100, Vienna, Austria (2000).

  3. Y.-I. Kim, A. Stanculescu, Ph. Finck, et al., “BN-600 hybrid core benchmark analysis,” in: PHYSOR 2002, October 7–10, 2002, Seoul, Korea, pp. 6A–05.

  4. A. V. Danilychev, L. V. Korobeinikova, A. S. Seregin, et al., “International assessment of the reactivity coefficients of materials in an IAEA test model (hybrid core of a BN-600 reactor),” Vopr. At. Nauk. Tekh., Ser. Yad. Konst., No. 1–2, 89–108 (2002).

  5. D. G. Elistratov, “DINCOR–simplified computer program for performing a dynamical calculation of accident regimes for conceptual studies of self-shielding of fast reactors,” Preprint FÉI-2869 (2000).

  6. J. Cahalan, A. Tentner, E. Morris, et al., “The SAS4A LMFBR whole core accident analysis code,” in: Proceedings of the International Meeting on Fast Reactor Safety, Knoxville, April 21–25 (1985), Vol. 2, pp. 989–997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Danilychev, D. G. Elistratov, and V. Yu. Stogov, “Effect of the computational error in the neutron-physical safety input data on the prediction of the consequences of the main accidents in the IAEA test model,” Voprosy atomnoi nauki i tekhniki. Ser. Yadernye konstanty, No. 1–2, 109–121 (2002).

  8. S. Belov, M. Farakshin, B. Vasilyev, and S. Voronov, “Results of comparative dynamics calculations of BN-600 hybrid core benchmark on the basis of different input data on reactivity coefficients,” in: Updated Codes and Method to Reduce the Calculational Uncertainties of Liquid Metal Fast Reactor, IAEA-RC-803.3, TWG-FR/106, Vienna, Austria (2002), pp. 150–173.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 323–333, November, 2004. Original article submitted October 27, 2003.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danilychev, A.V., Elistratov, D.G., Stogov, V.Y. et al. Computational error in calculating reactivity effects in fast reactors and its effect on the assessment of the consequences of the main types of accidents (analysis of the IAEA test model). At Energy 97, 735–743 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-004-0001-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-004-0001-9

Keywords

Navigation