Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 355, Issue 2, pp 347–352 | Cite as

Low energy secondary cosmic ray flux (gamma rays) monitoring and its constrains

  • Anil Raghav
  • Ankush Bhaskar
  • Virendra Yadav
  • Nitinkumar Bijewar
Original Article

Abstract

Temporal variation of secondary cosmic rays (SCR) flux was measured during the full and new moon and days close to them at Department of Physics, University of Mumbai, Mumbai (Geomagnetic latitude: 10.6 °N), India. The measurements were done by using NaI (Tl) scintillation detector with energy threshold of 200 keV. The SCR flux showed sudden enhancement for approximately about 2 hour during few days out of all observations. The maximum enhancement in SCR flux is about 200 % as compared to the diurnal trend of SCR temporal variations. Weather parameters (temperature and relative humidity) were continuously monitored during all observations. The influences of geomagnetic field, interplanetary parameters and tidal effect on SCR flux have been considered. Summed spectra corresponding to enhancement duration indicates appearance of atmospheric radioactivity which shows single gamma ray line. Detail investigation revealed the presence of radioactive Ar41. Present study indicates origin of Ar41 could be due to anthropogenic source or due to gravitational tidal forces. This measurements point out limitations on low energy SCR flux monitoring. This study will help many researchers in measurements of SCR flux during eclipses and to find unknown mechanism behind decrease/increase in SCR flux during solar/lunar eclipse.

Keywords

Secondary Cosmic Ray (SCR) Terrestrial gamma ray emission Atmospheric radioactivity Lunar tides Geomagnetic field Thermal neutron burst Newmoon Fullmoon Eclipse 

References

  1. Ananda Rao, J.N.: Variation in the background counting rate at Tirupati during the periods of solar and lunar eclipses. Phys. Lett. A 25, 74 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonova, V.P., Volodichev, N., Kryukov, S., Chubenko, A., Shchepetovet, A.: Effect of solar eclipse on neutron flux variations at the Earth’s surface. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci., Phys. 71, 1054–1057 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaskar, A., Purohit, A., Hemalatha, M., Pai, C., Raghav, A., Gurada, C., Radha, S., Yadav, V., Desai, V., Chitnis, A., Sarpotdar, P., Patankar, A.: A study of secondary cosmic ray flux during the annular eclipse of 15 January 2010 at Rameswaram, India. Astropart. Phys. 35, 223–229 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, R., Roy, M., Biswas, M., Guha, R., Bhoumick, A.: Cosmic ray intensity and surface parameters during solar eclipse on 22 July 2009 at Kalyani in West Bengal. Curr. Sci. 98, 1609–1614 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya, A., Biswas, S., Chatterjee, B.K., Das, M., Das, P.K., Das, T.K., De, T.K., Engineer, M.H., Mukherjee, R.N., Raha, S., Roy, S.C., Saha, S.K., Sen, A.K., Sinha, B., Syam, D.: Variation of gamma ray and particle fluxes at the sea level during the total solar eclipse of 24 October 1995. Astrophys. Space Sci. 250, 313–326 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, M.K., Divkar, J.K., Patil, S.S., Singh, R., Pradeepkumar, K.S., Sharma, D.N.: Study on enhanced atmospheric dispersion of Ar41 at the Trombay site. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 155(4), 483–496 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chintalapudi, S.N., Ghosh, V., Krishna, J.B.M., Verman, J.R., Prakash, H., Pal, G., Mishra, N.R., Bera, M., Reddy, V.R., Ranganath, M.R.: γ and X ray measurements during total solar eclipse on October 24 1995 at Diamond Harbour. Kodaikanal Obs. Bull. 13, 225–234 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorman, L.I.: Cosmic Rays in the Magnetosphere of the Earth and Other Planets. Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  9. Dorman, L.I., Shatashvili, L.Kh.: Lunar-daily variation of cosmic ray neutron component and the problem on its origin. Geomagn. Aeron. 1, 663–670 (1961)Google Scholar
  10. Kandemir, G., Guclu, M.C., Geckinli, M., Firat, C., Boydag, S., Ozguc, A.: Variation of cosmic ray intensity during the solar eclipse August 11, 1999. ASP Conf. Ser. 205, 202–207 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Krymsky, G.F.: On the lunar-daily cosmic ray variation. Trudy YaFAN 4, 108–110 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. Lockwood, J.A., Yingst, H.E.: Correlation of meteorological parameters with cosmic-ray neutron intensities. Phys. Rev. 104, 1718–1722 (1956)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyata, Y., et al.: Boron isotope variations in the atmosphere. Tellus B 52(4), 1057–1065 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nayak, P.K., Gupta, S.K., Jain, A., Mazumdar, I., Raha, S., Saha, S.K., Bobrov, A.V., Osipov, A., Shwartzet, B.: A study of gamma ray flux during the total solar eclipse of 1 August 2008 at Novosibirsk, Russia. Astropart. Phys. 32, 286–293 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raghav, A., et al.: Confirmation of secondary cosmic ray flux enhancement during the total lunar eclipse of December 10, 2011. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1–15 (2013). doi: 10.1002/2013JA019007.50614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raghav, A., Bhaskar, A., Lotekar, A., Vichare, G., Yadav, V.: Understanding Forbush decrease drivers based on shock-only and CME-only models using global signature of February 14, 1978 event (2014). arXiv:1406.4608. Also accepted in J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., October/November 2014 edition
  17. Raghu Kanth, S.T.G., Iyengar, R.N.: Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city. Curr. Sci. 91(11), 1486–1494 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Rajaram, G., Prisharoty, P.R.: The Earth’s Magnetic Field, pp. 146–147. Oxford/IBH Publishing, New Delhi (1998)Google Scholar
  19. Volodichev, N.N., Nechaev, O.Yu., Panasyuk, M.I., Shavrin, P.I.: Neutron beta-decay contribution to soft-electron intensity in the atmosphere. In: 20th Intern. Cosmic Ray Conf., vol. 4, pp. 266–268. Nauka, Moscow (1987)Google Scholar
  20. Volodichev, N.N., Kuzhevskij, B.M., Nechaev, O.Yu., Panasyuk, M.I., Shavrin, P.I.: Strong increase of neutron flux during 22 July 1990 eclipse. In: Proc. 22nd ICRC, Dublin, Ireland, 11–23 August 1991, vol. 3, pp. 689–692 (1991)Google Scholar
  21. Volodichev, N.N., Kuzhevskij, B.M., Nechaev, O.Yu., Panasyuk, M.I., Shavrin, P.I.: Phenomenon of neutron intensity burst during new and full moons. Cosm. Res. 35, 135–143 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Raghav
    • 1
  • Ankush Bhaskar
    • 2
  • Virendra Yadav
    • 2
  • Nitinkumar Bijewar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of MumbaiSantacruz (E)India
  2. 2.Indian Institute of GeomagnetismNew PanvelIndia

Personalised recommendations