Abstract
Adolescence and emerging adulthood are developmental phases in which the exploration of one's own sexuality takes on a high priority, which can increase the risk of risky sexual behavior. Due to technological advances, (non-consensual) sexting has increased among young people and has become an integral part of their sexual socialization. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine non-consensual sexting (both victimization and perpetration) among adolescents and emerging adults and to identify potential risk factors associated with non-consensual sexting using routine activity theory. The sample consisted of a total of 3514 adolescents aged 10–17 years (43% males; 57% females) and 3674 emerging adults aged 18–25 years (23% males; 77% females) from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. The results showed that both male adolescents and emerging adults were at higher risk for experiencing non-consensual sexting victimization. Personal factors such as gender, age, social bond, and routine cell phone activity predicted the risk of becoming a victim of non-consensual sexting in adolescents. For emerging adults, gender, social connection to friends, and routine cell phone use predicted the risk of becoming a victim of non-consensual sexting. Relationship status and routine cell phone activity predicted the forwarding of other sexts for both age groups. According to international scientific research and the findings of this particular study, we can conclude that the study of personal factors and routine variables helps understand non-consensual sexting among youth but is also essential in planning educational resources and preventive activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data are available on reasonable request and on signature of a confidentiality agreement from author Arta Dodaj.
References
Alexander, K. A., Jemmott, L. S., Teitelman, A. M., & D’Antonio, P. (2015). Addressing sexual health behaviour during emerging adulthood: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(1–2), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12640
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Barlow, M. R., & Cromer, L. D. (2006). Trauma-relevant characteristics in a university human subjects pool population: Gender, major, betrayal and latency of participation. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 7(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J229v07n02_05
Barrense-Dias, Y., Akre, C., Auderset, D., Leeners, B., Morselli, D., & Surís, J. C. (2020). Non-consensual sexting: Characteristics and motives of youths who share received-intimate content without consent. Sexual Health, 17(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19201
Barrense-Dias, Y., Berchtold, A., Surís, J. C., & Akre, C. (2017). Sexting and the definition issue. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(5), 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.009
Barroso, R., Marinho, A. R., Figueiredo, P., Ramião, E., & Silva, A. S. (2022). Consensual and non-consensual sexting behaviors in adolescence: A systematic review. Adolescent Research Review, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-022-00199-0
Barroso, R., Ramião, E., Figueiredo, P., & Araújo, A. M. (2021). Abusive sexting in adolescence: Prevalence and characteristics of abusers and victims. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(610474), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610474
Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Livingstone, S. (2014). Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Sexting Motivations Questionnaire for adolescents and young adults. Rassegna di Psicologia, 33(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.13133/1974-4854/16657
Boer, S., Erdem, Ö., de Graaf, H., & Goetz, H. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of sext-sharing among a representative sample of youth in the Netherlands. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655796
Branch, K., Hilinski-Rosick, C. M., Johnson, E., & Solano, G. (2017). Revenge porn victimization of college students in the United States: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.495777
Burén, J., & Lunde, C. (2018). Sexting among adolescents: A nuanced and gendered online challenge for young people. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.003
Cary, K. M., & Reese-Weber, M. (2021). Setting the stage for emerging adulthood sexuality: Adolescent sexuality as the prequel. In E. M. Morgan & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Sexuality in emerging adulthood (pp. 23–42). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190057008.003.0003
Casas, J. A., Ojeda, M., Elipe, P., & Del Rey, R. (2019). Exploring which factors contribute to teens’ participation in sexting. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.010
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2012). Risky disclosures on facebook: The effect of having a bad experience on online behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(6), 714–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411432635
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
Crocetti, E., Palmonari, A., & Pojaghi, B. (2007). The network of relationships of Italian emerging adults: The importance of family and peers. Poster presented at 3rd Conference on Emerging Adulthood. Tucson, AZ.
Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., Maziarz, L., & Ward, B. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2012.650959
De Jong, E., Bernasco, W., & Lammers, M. (2020). Situational correlates of adolescent substance use: An improved test of the Routine activity theory of deviant behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09433-w
Del Rey, R., Ojeda, M., & Casas, J. A. (2021). Validation of the sexting behavior and motives questionnaire (SBM-Q). Psicothema, 33(2), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.207
Del Rey, R., Ojeda, M., Casas, J. A., Mora-Merchán, J. A., & Elipe, P. (2019). Sexting among adolescents: The emotional impact and influence of the need for popularity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01828
Dodaj, A., Prijatelj, K., & Sesar, K. (2023). Raširenost i odrednice sekstinga među srednjoškolcima i studentima iz Bosne i Hercegovine i Hrvatske [Prevalence and determinants of sexting among high school students and students from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia] (Report No. HRZZ 3553). Department of Psychology, University of Zadar. https://www.croris.hr/crosbi/publikacija/rad-ostalo/793265
Dodaj, A., Sesar, K., & Jerinić, S. (2020). A prospective study of highschool adolescent sexting behavior and psychological distress. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 154(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1666788
Drouin, M., Ross, J., & Tobin, E. (2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.001
Eccles, J., Templeton, J., Barber, B., & Stone, M. (2003). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: The critical passage ways to adulthood. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, & K. A. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 383–406). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Fincham, F. D., & Cui, M. (2010). Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. Cambridge University Press.
Gámez-Guadix, M., Mateos-Pérez, E., Wachs, S., Wright, M., Martínez, J., & Íncera, D. (2022). Assessing image-based sexual abuse: Measurement, prevalence, and temporal stability of sextortion and nonconsensual sexting (“revenge porn”) among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 94(5), 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12064
Gassó, A. M., Mueller-Johnson, K., & Gómez-Durán, E. L. (2021). Victimization as a result of non-consensual dissemination of sexting and psychopathology correlates: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126564
Henry, N., Powell, A., & Flynn, A. (2018). Not just “revenge pornography:” Australians’ experiences of image-based abuse: A summary report. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.29903.59045
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
Holmes, L. G., Nilssen, A. R., Cann, D., & Strassberg, D. S. (2021). A sex-positive mixed methods approach to sexting experiences among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106619
Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., Malinski, R., & May, D. C. (2016). Identifying predictors of unwanted online sexual conversations among youth using a low self-control and routine activity framework. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(2), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215621376
Hunehäll Berndtsson, K. (2022). “Something you just don’t talk about”: An analysis of teenage boys’ experiences of non-consensual sexting in lower secondary school. Journal of Men’s Studies, 30, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265211042794
Karasavva, V., & Forth, A. (2022). Personality, attitudinal, and demographic predictors of non-consensual dissemination of intimate images. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP19265–NP19289. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211043586
Kernsmith, P. D., Victor, B. G., & Smith-Darden, J. P. (2018). Online, offline, and over the line: Coercive sexting among adolescent dating partners. Youth and Society, 50(7), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18764040
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007
Kotiuga, J., Yampolsky, M. A., & Martin, G. M. (2022). Adolescents’ perception of their sexual self, relational capacities, attitudes towards sexual pleasure and sexual practices: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 51(3), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01543-8
Kumar, A., & Epley, N. (2021). It’s surprisingly nice to hear you: Misunderstanding the impact of communication media can lead to suboptimal choices of how to connect with others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(3), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000962
Lee, C. H., Moak, S., & Walker, J. T. (2016). Effects of self-control, social control, and social learning on sexting behavior among south Korean Youths. Youth and Society, 48(2), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X13490762
Lei, L., & South, S. J. (2021). Explaining the decline in young adult sexual activity in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 83(1), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12723
Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Prevalence of tmultiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314
Mandić, S. & Radić Bursać, S. (2020). Sexting & sextortion. Agency for Electronic Media & UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.medijskapismenost.hr/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/sexting-sextorion-1.pdf
Molla-Esparza, C., López-González, E., & Losilla, J. M. (2020). Sexting prevalence and socio-demographic correlates in spanish secondary school students. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00434-0
Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N., Rash, C., & Madigan, S. (2020). The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
Mori, C., Park, J., Temple, J. R., & Madigan, S. (2022). Are youth sexting rates still on the rise? A meta-analytic update. Journal of Adolescent Health, 70(4), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.026
Morillo-Puente, S., Ríos-Hernández, I. N., & Henao-López, G. C. (2022). Empirical evaluation of sexting and routine activities of adolescents in Colombia. OBETS, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 17(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.14198/OBETS2022.17.2.07
Naezer, M., & van Oosterhout, L. (2021). Only sluts love sexting: Youth, sexual norms and non-consensual sharing of digital sexual images. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1799767
Norman, J. (2017). Implications of parenting behaviour and adolescent attachment for understanding adolescent sexting (Doctoral dissertation, University of Windsor, ON. Retrieved from https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7285
Ojeda, M., Del Rey, R., Walrave, M., & Vandebosch, H. (2020). Sexting in adolescents: Prevalence and behaviours. Comunicar, 28(64), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-01
Ojeda, M., Dodaj, A., Sesar, K., & Del Rey, R. (2022). “Some voluntarily and some under pressure”: Conceptualization, reasons, attitudes, and consequences of sexting among adolescents. Telematics and Informatics, 75, 101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101891
Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655.
Perrin, A. (2015). Social media usage: 2005–2015. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Quayle, E. (2022). Self-produced images, sexting, coercion and children’s rights. ERA Forum, 23(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00714-9
Reyns, B., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyber lifestyle routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1149–1169.
Reyns, B. W., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. S. (2014). Digital deviance: Low self-control and opportunity as explanations of sexting among college students. Sociological Spectrum, 34(3), 273–292.
Rice, E., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Sanchez, M., Montoya, J., Plant, A., & Kordic, T. (2012). Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents. Pediatrics, 130(4), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0021
Rice, E., Winetrobe, H., Holloway, I. W., Montoya, J., Plant, A., & Kordic, T. (2015). Cell phone internet access, online sexual solicitation, partner seeking, and sexual risk behavior among adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 755–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0366-3
Ricon, T., & Dolev-Cohen, M. (2024). Sexting behavior by young adults: The correlation between emotion regulation and moral judgment. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 19, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2023.2212189
Scholes-Balog, K., Francke, N., & Hemphill, S. (2016). Relationships between sexting, self-esteem, and sensation seeking among Australian young adults. Sexualization, Media, & Society, 2(2), 2374623815627790. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374623815627790
Schokkenbroek, J. M., Ponnet, K., & Hardyns, W. (2023). Technology-facilitated harm and abuse in intimate relationships. In Encyclopedia of domestic violence (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85493-5_2166-1
Sesar, K., & Dodaj, A. (2019). Sexting and emotional regulation strategies among young adults. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2019.7.2008
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1964). Reference groups exploration into conformity and deviation of adolescents. Harper & Row.
Valido, A., Espelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., Rivas-Koehl, M., & Robinson, L. E. (2020). Social-ecological examination of non-consensual sexting perpetration among US adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249477
Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & d’Haenens, L. (2017). Adolescent sexting from a social learning perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.009
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Heirman, W. (2015). The association between adolescent sexting, psychosocial difficulties, and risk behavior: Integrative review. Journal of School Nursing, 31(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840514541964
Vasilenko, S. A., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2018). Sexual behavior and daily affect in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 6(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818767503
Wachs, S., Wright, M. F., Gámez-Guadix, M., & Döring, N. (2021). How are consensual, non-consensual, and pressured sexting linked to depression and self-harm? The moderating effects of demographic variables. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052597
Wolfe, S. E., Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2014). Routine cell phone activity and exposure to sext messages: Extending the generality of routine activity theory and exploring the etiology of a risky teenage behavior. Crime & Delinquency, 62(5), 614–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714541192
Wood, M., Barter, C., Stanley, N., Aghtaie, N., & Larkins, C. (2015). Images across Europe: The sending and receiving of sexual images and associations with interpersonal violence in young people’s relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.005
Wu, X. S., Zhang, Z. H., Feng, Z., Wang, W. J., & Li, Y. F. (2016). Prevalence of internet addiction and its association with social support and other related factors among adolescents in China. Journal of Adolescence, 52, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.07.012
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the participants of study for their participation.
Funding
This research leading to these results received funding from Croatian Science Foundation under Grant Agreement No 3553.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Arta Dodaj conceived the study, conducted the analysis, and took the lead on drafting the manuscript; Kristina Sesar participated in the design and coordination of the study and provided critical feedback on drafts; Krešimir Prijatelj conceived of the study; Sabina Mandić participated in the interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; Sanja Radić Bursać provided critical feedback on drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study was received ethical approval from the Ethics Institutional Review Bord from the University of Mostar, University of Zadar, University of Applied Health Sciences Zagreb, and University of Banja Luka, as well as from the Croatian Ministry of Education and Science, and the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Informed Consent
Active informed consent was obtained from the participants and/or parents.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dodaj, A., Sesar, K., Prijatelj, K. et al. Risk Factors for Non-Consensual Sexting Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: An Extension of the Routine Activity Theory Perspective. Arch Sex Behav 53, 2583–2596 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02903-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02903-8