Skip to main content
Log in

Everyday Sexual and Gender Minority Stress and Health: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling Studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual and gender minority stress is associated with negative physical and mental health outcomes, such as hypertension and depression. Expanding on previous reviews of the literature on cross-sectional and long-term prospective associations between sexual and gender minority stress and health outcomes, the current systematic review synthesizes the evidence on how everyday sexual and gender minority stress relates to momentary changes in health. The findings of 53 experience sampling studies published between 2007 and 2022 suggest that daily and momentary within-persons fluctuations in minority stressors are associated with cognitive–emotional (e.g., affect, suicidality), behavioral (e.g., substance use), social (e.g., relationship satisfaction), and physical health outcomes (e.g., somatic symptoms). These findings suggest that sexual and gender minority stress is a dynamic process that can vary within individuals over time and significantly impact everyday mental and physical health. We discuss the implications of these findings for minority stress theory, LGBTQ+ health research, LGBTQ+ affirming therapy, and prevention initiatives. The current experience sampling literature is limited by a lack of attention to gender minority stress and a focus on a limited range of health outcomes. Methodological and theoretical considerations for future experience sampling research are discussed in light of these limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

A database of the reviewed studies is available the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/2qnv9/.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. For studies that included cisgender-heterosexual comparison groups, only the LGBTQ + sample was included. Papers that reported findings from multiple studies using separate samples were counted separately.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Kameryn Freeman for her assistance with screening the articles in the literature search for this review.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JN and KB contributed to conceptualization of this review. JN performed the literature search, data analysis, and data visualization. JN drafted the manuscript, and both authors critically revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Nicholas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial competing interest to disclose. As this was a systematic review of previous research, no ethical approval was required. Data are available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2qnv9/).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nicholas, J., Bresin, K. Everyday Sexual and Gender Minority Stress and Health: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling Studies. Arch Sex Behav 53, 1221–1243 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02779-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02779-0

Keywords

Navigation