Abstract
Consensual nonmonogamy (CNM) is increasingly recognized as a relevant aspect of family and relational diversity in the USA, but CNM-parenting is still perceived as a taboo topic. Pioneering research has only started to emerge and reveals persisting notions of regulation, discrimination, and stigmatization of CNM-parents. CNM-stigmatization is less prevalent among emerging adults, but it is unclear whether young adults’ increasing acceptance of CNM relationships extends to their views on parenting. To explore emerging adults’ perspectives on CNM-parenting, we conducted a mixed-method study with a diverse sample of 107 US-American college students. Each participant read four relationship-vignettes (monogamy, CNM-polyamory, CNM-open relationship, CNM-swinging) in randomized order, provided ratings for the perceived parenting capabilities of the described partners and described reasons for those ratings in short essays. On average, participants perceived the monogamous partners as more capable of raising children than the CNM partners. LGBTQ + participants perceived CNM-parents, especially polyamorous and swinging partners, as more capable for parenthood than did heterosexual participants. There were no significant differences in response patterns between males and females. In their essays, participants discussed their views on how the different relationship structures might affect parenting and what they perceived as indicators and conditions for successful parenting. The results of this study were interpreted relative to life-course perspectives of identity development, and relative to politico-economic perspectives on parental investment and sexual strategy theories. Implications are derived for sexuality education, research, and practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
The materials that were used in this study are embedded into the manuscript. In adherence to the informed consent of this study, data are not publicly available.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Albo, B. (2017). 5 awesome polyamorous dating sites. Live about. Retrieved from: https://www.liveabout.com/great-polyamorous-dating-sites-1021650
Anapol, D. (2010). Polyamory in the 21st century. Rowman & Littlefield.
Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late tends through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7
Arseneau, E., Landry, S., & Darling, E. K. (2019). The Polyamorous Childbearing and Birth Experiences Study (POLYBABES): A qualitative study of the health care experiences of polyamorous families during pregnancy and birth. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(41), 1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190224
Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner, and this is my … partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530590523107
Barker, M. (2011). Monogamies and non-monogamies: A response to “the challenge of monogamy: Bringing it out of the closet and into the treatment room” by Marianne Brandon. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 26(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2011.595401
Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (2010). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13, 748–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460710384645
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation asa useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., & Westen, D. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not explained by alternative hypotheses. Psychological Science, 7(6), 373–375.
Chin, M. (2017). I’m polyamorous, and Facebook doesn’t think my sexuality exists. Mashable. Retrieved from: https://mashable.com/2017/11/03/facebook-doesnt-think-my-sexuality-exists/#PdtRxffcGPqh
Cohen, M. T., & Wilson, K. (2017). Development of the Consensual Nonmonogamy Attitude Scale (CNAS). Sexuality & Culture, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9395-5
Conley, T. D., Matsick, J. L., Moors, A. C., & Ziegler, A. (2017). Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: Theories, methods, and new directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2017.1367982
Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013a). The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01286.x
Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013b). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.832934
Döring, N., Daneback, K., Shaughnessy, K., Grov, C., & Byers, E. S. (2017). Online sexual activity experiences among college students: A four-country comparison. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0656-4
Duke, A. (2012). Newt Gingrich wanted ‘open marriage,’ ex-wife says. CNN. Retrieved September 5, 2022 from https://www.cnn.com/2012/01/19/politics/gingrich-wife
Echols, T. N. (2022). Decriminalizing adultery: An unanticipated step in restoring the value of marriage. Liberty University Law Review, 16(2). Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol16/iss2/2
Goldfeder, M., & Sheff, E. (2013). Children in polyamorous families: A first empirical look. Journal of Law and Social Deviance, 5, 150–243.
Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. (2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193
Hamilton, L. D., De Santis, C., & Thompson, A. E. (2021). Introduction to the special section on consensual non-monogamy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02055-z
Haritaworn, J., Lin, C., Klesse, C., et al. (2006). Poly/logue: A critical introduction to polyamory. Sexualities, 9(5), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069963
Haupert, M. L., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(5), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
Hegarty, P. (2013). Deconstructing the ideal of fidelity: A view from LGB psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-415.2012.01298.x
Igielnik, R. (2020). Men and women in the U.S. continue to differ in voter turnout rate, party identification. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/18/men-and-women-in-the-u-s-continue-to-differ-in-voter-turnout-rate-party-identification/
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Klesse, C. (2007). The spectre of promiscuity: Gay male and bisexual non-monogamies. Ashgate.
Klesse, C. (2014). Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation? Sexualities, 17(1–2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713511096
Klesse, C. (2018). Theorizing multi-partner relationships and sexualities–recent work on non-monogamy and polyamory. Sexualities, 21(7), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717701691
Klesse, C. (2019). Polyamorous parenting: Stigma, social regulation, and queer bonds of resistance. Sociological Research Online, 24(4), 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418806902
Klesse, C., Cardoso, D., Pallotta-Chiarolli, C., Raab, M., Schadler, C., & Schippers, M. (2022). Introduction: Parenting, polyamory and consensual non-monogamy. Critical and queer perspectives. Sexualities. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607221114466
Landry, S., Arseneau, E., & Darling, E. K. (2021). “It’s a little bit tricky”: Results from the Polyamorous Childbearing and Birth Experiences Study (POLYBABES). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1479–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02025-5
Lano, K., & Parry-Lano, C. (1995). Breaking the barriers to desire. Five Leaves Publications.
Matsick, J., Conley, T., Ziegler, A., Moors, A., & Rubin, J. (2014). Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.832934
Moors, A. C., Conley, T. D., Edelstein, R. S., & Chopik, W. J. (2015). Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514529065
Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Schechinger, H. A. (2017). Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships. European Psychologist, 22(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000278
Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., Rubin, J. D., & Conley, T. D. (2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual non-monogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12020
Moors, A. C., Ramos, A., & Schechinger, H. (2023). Bridging the science communication gap: The development of a fact sheet for clinicians and researchers about consensenually non-monogamous relationships. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 10(1), 166–174.
Moors, A. C., Rubin, J. D., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). It’s not just a gay male thing: Sexual minority women and men are equally attracted to consensual non-monogamy. Journal für Psychologie, 22(1), 38–51.
Multiamory. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.multiamory.com/podcast
Neuendorf, K. A. (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In P. Brough (Ed.), Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 211–223). Routledge.
Ossmann, S. F. (2020). Introducing the new kid on the block: polyamory. In Z. Davy, A. C. Santos, C. Bertone, R. Thoreson, & S. E. Wieringa (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of global sexualities (pp. 363–385). Sage Publications Limited.
Our world in data (2022). Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/
Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2010). “To pass, border or pollute”: Polyfamilies go to school. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 182–187). Routledge.
Pallotta-Chiarolli, M., Sheff, E., & Mountford, R. (2020). Polyamorous parenting in contemporary research: Developments and future directions. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBTQ-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 171–183). Springer Nature.
Rodrigues, D. L., Lopes, D., & Huic, A. (2021). What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1587–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01895-5
Ross, B., & Schwartz, R. (2012). Exclusive: Gingrich lacks moral character to be president, ex-wife says. ABC Nightline. Retrieved September 5, 2022 from https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/exclusive-gingrich-lacks-moral-character-president-wife/story?id=15392899
Rubel, A. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2014). Consensual nonmonogamy: Psychological well-being and relationship quality correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.942722
Ruiz, M. (2022). Is monogamy over? Inside love’s sharing economy. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.vogue.com/article/the-rise-of-consensual-non-monogamy
Ryan, C., & Jethå, C. (2010). Sex at dawn: The prehistoric origins of modern sexuality. Harper.
Schechinger, H. A., Sakaluk, J. K., & Moors, A. C. (2018). Harmful and helpful therapy practices with consensually non-monogamous clients: Toward an inclusive framework. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(11), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000349
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051
Seidman, S. (2013). From polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight (pp. 43–65). Routledge.
Séguin, L. (2019). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Lay attitudes and perceptions of polyamory. Sexualities, 22(4), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717713382
Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2016). Willingness to engage in consensual nonmonogamy among emerging adults: A structural equation analysis of sexual identity, casualsexattitudes, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 54(9), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1243200
Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2017a). Testing the validity and factor structure of the willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy scale among college men and women. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0263-8
Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2017b). A systematic review of research on attitudes towards and willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy among emerging adults: Methodological issues considered. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(1–2), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1319407
Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2018). Willingness of emerging adults to engage in consensual non-monogamy: A mixed-methods analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1423–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1075-5
Stephens, A. K., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2020). Adults’ identities, attitudes, and orientations concerning consensual non-monogamy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17(3), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00409-w
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7.
Veaux, F. (2022). More than two. Franklin Veaux’s Polyamory Site. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.morethantwo.com/
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge and thank our graduate and undergraduate research assistants for their various contributions to this study. The authors thank and acknowledge the participants of this study.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ML contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, data collection and analysis, the writing of the first draft, reviews, and edits. MO contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, reviews, and edits. CEL provided training on Thematic Analyses, and contributed to reviews, and edits. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of APA. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the authors’ university (approved on November 8, 2020; IRB Protocol # 33306). Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study, and participants were debriefed immediately after completing the study. The debriefing included a short description of the study purpose, and contact information of the principal investigator, the institutional review board, and available student counseling services.
Informed Consent
See above.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lippmann, M., Olwert, M.R. & Leistner, C.E. Emerging Adults’ Perspectives on Consensually Nonmonogamous Parenting. Arch Sex Behav 53, 321–339 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02720-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02720-5