Abstract
Contemporary women frequently employ beautification strategies. The impact of such strategies, such as plastic surgery, on mating popularity in different mate contexts remains unclear. To investigate this issue, the current study conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, beautification strategies were manipulated using three images of the same female with different conditions (natural, makeup, and plastic surgery). The results indicated that when the beautification strategies were not informed, surgical-enhanced and makeup targets were perceived as significantly more attractive, loyal, and popular among potential mates than natural targets. However, when participants were informed of the beautification strategies, both natural and makeup targets showed a significant increase in perceived loyalty and mating popularity. In contrast, surgically enhanced targets saw a reduction in these dimensions. Experiment 2 aimed to reduce the confounding effect of facial attractiveness by using vignettes. The results indicated that the mating popularity of natural targets was significantly higher than that of makeup or surgically enhanced targets, with surgically enhanced targets being the least popular. Moreover, the results revealed the mediating role of perceived loyalty in the impact of beautification strategies on long-term mating popularity. This study sheds light on the potential stigmatization and negative bias toward beautification strategies in the mating market. Additionally, it provides guidance for women who intend to enhance their mate popularity through plastic surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
The data and material that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Agthe, M., Strobel, M., Spörrle, M., Pfundmair, M., & Maner, J. K. (2016). On the borders of harmful and helpful beauty biases: The biasing effects of physical attractiveness depend on sex and ethnicity. Evolutionary Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916653968
Alotaibi, A. S. (2021). Demographic and cultural differences in the acceptance and pursuit of makeup surgery: A systematic literature review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 9(3), 3501. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003501
Anchieta, N. M., Mafra, A. L., Hokama, R. T., Varella, M. A. C., Melo, J. D. A., da Silva, L. O., & Valentova, J. V. (2021). Makeup and its application simulation affect women’s self-perceptions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(8), 3777–3784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02127-0
Arnocky, S., Bird, B. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014). An evolutionary perspective on characteristics of physical attractiveness in humans. In A. Rennolds (Ed.), Psychology of interpersonal perception and relationships (pp. 115–155). Nova Science Publishers.
Bakhshi, S. (2011). Women’s body image and the role of culture: A review of the literature. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v7i2.135
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Batres, C., Porcheron, A., Kaminski, G., Courrèges, S., Morizot, F., & Russell, R. (2018a). Evidence that the hormonal contraceptive pill is associated with makeup habits. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01459
Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L. (2018b). Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Diferences, 122, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.1.023
Bonell, S., Barlow, F. K., & Griffiths, S. (2021a). The cosmetic surgery paradox: Toward a contemporary understanding of cosmetic surgery popularization and attitudes. Body Image, 38, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.04.010
Bonell, S., Murphy, S. C., Austen, E., & Griffiths, S. (2022). When (fake) beauty turns ugly: Plastic surgery as a moral violation. Current Psychology, 41, 5444–5457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01060-0
Bonell, S., Murphy, S. C., & Griffiths, S. (2021b). Under the knife: Unfavorable perceptions of women who seek plastic surgery. PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0257145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257145
Borau, S., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2020). Gendered products act as the extended phenotype of human sexual dimorphism: They increase physical attractiveness and desirability. Journal of Business Research, 120, 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.007
Bradshaw, H. K., Leyva, R. P., Nicolas, S. C., & Hill, S. E. (2019). Costly female appearance-enhancement provides cues of short-term mating effort: The case of makeup surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.019
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(6), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00037-8
Buunk, A. P., Bucksath, A. F., & Cordero, S. (2017). Intrasexual competitiveness and personality traits: A study in uruguay. Personality & Individual Differences, 108, 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.060
Cash, T. F., Morrow, J. A., Hrabosky, J. I., & Perry, A. A. (2004). How has body image changed? A cross-sectional investigation of college women and men from 1983 to 2001. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022006X.72.6.1081
Chang, L., Wang, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Chinese mate preferences: Cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.016
Chasteen, A. L., Bashir, N. Y., Gallucci, C., & Visekruna, A. (2011). Age and antiaging technique influence reactions to age concealment. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(6), 719–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr063
Childs, M. J., & Jones, A. (2022). Perceptions of individuals who engage in age concealment. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000305
Cloud, J. M., & Perilloux, C. (2022). The relationship between mating context and women’s appearance enhancement strategies. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000242
Confer, J. C., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: Men’s priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.002
Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2020). An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4
DelPriore, D. J., Bradshaw, H. K., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Appearance enhancement produces a strategic beautification penalty among women. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(4), 348–360.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
Dubbs, S. L., Kelly, A. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2017). Ravishing rivals: Female intrasexual competition and makeup surgery. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 597–616). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.35
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1086/656575
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Makeups as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025656
Fales, M. R., Frederick, D. A., Garcia, J. R., Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies. Personality and Individual Diferences, 88, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.041
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2009). The influence of female attractiveness on competitor derogation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.7.2009.2.3
Fiske, L., Fallon, E. A., Blissmer, B., & Redding, C. A. (2014). Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among United States adults: Review and recommendations for future research. Eating Behaviors, 15(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.04.001
Fugère, M. A., Cousins, A. J., & MacLaren, S. A. (2015). (Mis) matching in physical attractiveness and women’s resistance to mate guarding. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.048
Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Frederick, D. A. (2010). The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 240–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020451
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102006085
Guéguen, N. (2008). Brief report: The effects of women’s makeups on men’s approach: An evaluation in a bar. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 221–228.
Harris, D. L., & Carr, A. T. (2001). Prevalence of concern about physical appearance in the general population. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 54(3), 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2001.355
Harris, M. B. (1994). Growing old gracefully: Age concealment and gender. Journal of Gerontology, 49(4), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.4.P149
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2009). Do women feel worse to look their best? Testing the relationship between self-esteem and fertility status across the menstrual cycle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(12), 1592–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346303
Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2011). Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: Mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210395603
Hong, S., Jahng, M. R., Lee, N., & Wise, K. R. (2020). Do you filter who you are? Excessive self-presentation, social cues, and user evaluations of Instagram selfies. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106159
International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. (2020). ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2020.
Jones, D., Brace, C. L., Jankowiak, W., Laland, K. N., Musselman, L. E., Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Pérusse, D., Schweder, B., & Symons, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 36(5), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1086/204427
Kamble, S., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Indian mate preferences: Continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.024
Kellie, D. J., Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2021). Behind the makeup: The effects of makeups on women’s self-objectification, and their objectification by others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4–5), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2767
Klatt, J., Eimler, S. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Makeup your mind: The impact of styling on perceived competence and warmth of female leaders. Journal of Social Psychology, 156(5), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1129303
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallamm, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947
Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468
Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005
Little, A. C. (2021). Facial attractiveness. Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1881
Luxen, M. F., & Van De Vijver, F. J. (2006). Facial attractiveness, sexual selection, and personnel selection: When evolved preferences matter. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.357
Maestripieri, D., Henry, A., & Nickels, N. (2017). Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000340
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., de Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
Mays, H. L., Jr., & Hill, G. E. (2004). Choosing mates: Good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(10), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.018
Mileva, V. R., Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Little, A. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without makeups. Perception, 45(10), 1166–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053
Mogilski, J. K., Vrabel, J., Mitchell, V. E., & Welling, L. L. (2019). The primacy of trust within romantic relationships: Evidence from conjoint analysis of HEXACO-derived personality profiles. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.04.001
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
Putz, Á., Kocsor, F., & Bereczkei, T. (2018). Beauty stereotypes affect the generalization of behavioral traits associated with previously seen faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.011
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Russell, R., Batres, C., Courrèges, S., Kaminski, G., Soppelsa, F., Morizot, F., & Porcheron, A. (2019). Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12337
Samper, A., Yang, L. W., & Daniels, M. E. (2018). Beauty, effort, and misrepresentation: How beauty work affects judgments of moral character and consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx116
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 894–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894
Swami, V. (2010). Translation and validation of the Malay Acceptance of Makeup Surgery Scale. Body Image, 7(4), 372–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.07.005
Swami, V., Hwang, C. S., & Jung, J. (2012). Factor structure and correlates of the Acceptance of Makeup Surgery scale among South Korean university students. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11431577
Tam, K. P., Ng, H. K. S., Kim, Y. H., Yeung, V. W. L., & Cheung, F. Y. L. (2012). Attitudes toward makeup surgery patients: The role of culture and social contact. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(4), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.637997
Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Madallh Alhabahba, M., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Anjum, A., Atama, C. S., Atamtürk Duyar, D., Ayebare, R., Batres, C., Bendixen, M., Bensafia, A., Bizumic, B., Boussena, M., et al. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154
Wickham, H., Chang, W., & Wickham, M. H. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’. Create elegant data visualizations using the grammar of graphics. Version, 2(1), 1–189.
Woodstock, L. (2001). Skin deep, soul deep: Mass mediating cosmetic surgery in popular magazines, 1968–1998. The Communication Review, 4(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420109359477
Wu, Q., Liu, Z., Liu, X., & Chen, D. (2022a). The cost of beauty: Perception of makeup and male mate choice. Current Psychology, 42, 14620–14634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02677-5
Wu, Y., Mulkens, S., & Alleva, J. M. (2022b). Body image and acceptance of makeup surgery in China and the Netherlands: A qualitative study on cultural differences and similarities. Body Image, 40, 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.10.007
Xiao, Q., Li, A., & Zhu, Y. (2017). Moral judgments on short-term sexual behaviors among Chinese college students: Exploring the roles of gender and physical attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00191
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970984) and The MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities (Grant Number: 22JJD190005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FL did conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, writing, and original draft preparation. XH done conceptualization, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing. YL was involved in conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, writing, revised, and original draft preparation. CH supervised and revised the study. SZ done software, data analysis revised the study. HW done writing—reviewing. MH contributed to conceptualization.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the South China Normal University Ethics Committee.
Consent to Participate
Written informed consent was obtained from individual or guardian participants.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, F., Lei, Y., He, C. et al. The Effect of Beautification Strategies on Mating Popularity Judged by Men from the People’s Republic of China. Arch Sex Behav 53, 247–261 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02673-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02673-9