References
Biondi-Zoccai, G., Romagnoli, E., Agostoni, P., Capodanno, D., Castagno, D., D’Ascenzo, F., Sangiorgi, G., & Modena, M. G. (2011). Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis? Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32(5), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.006
Blakely, T., Lynch, J., Simons, K., Bentley, R., & Rose, S. (2020). Reflection on modern methods: When worlds collide—Prediction, machine learning and causal inference. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(6), 2058–2064. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz132
Blosnich, J. R., Henderson, E. R., Coulter, R. W. S., Goldbach, J. T., & Meyer, I. H. (2020). Sexual orientation change efforts, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide ideation and attempt among sexual minority adults, United States, 2016–2018. American Journal of Public Health, 110(7), 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305637
Bours, M. J. L. (2021). Tutorial: A nontechnical explanation of the counterfactual definition of effect modification and interaction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.022
Cole, S. R., Platt, R. W., Schisterman, E. F., Chu, H., Westreich, D., Richardson, D., & Poole, C. (2010). Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(2), 417–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp334
Dreyer, N. A., Tunis, S. R., Berger, M., Ollendorf, D., Mattox, P., & Gliklich, R. (2010). Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research. Health Affairs, 29(10), 1818–1825. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666
Elze, M. C., Gregson, J., Baber, U., Williamson, E., Sartori, S., Mehran, R., Nichols, M., Stone, G. W., & Pocock, S. J. (2017). Comparison of propensity score methods and covariate adjustment. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.060
Fu, E. L., Groenwold, R. H. H., Zoccali, C., Jager, K. J., van Diepen, M., & Dekker, F. W. (2019). Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 34(10), 1629–1635. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy283
Gangl, M. (2010). Causal Inference in Sociological Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102702
Graetz, N., Boen, C. E., & Esposito, M. H. (2022). Structural racism and quantitative causal inference: A life course mediation framework for decomposing racial health disparities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 63(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465211066108
Greenland, S., & Brumback, B. (2002). An overview of relations among causal modelling methods. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(5), 1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.5.1030
Greenland, S., & Morgenstern, H. (2001). Confounding in health research. Annual Review of Public Health, 22(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.189
Hammerton, G., & Munafò, M. R. (2021). Causal inference with observational data: The need for triangulation of evidence. Psychological Medicine, 51(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720005127
Hernán, M. A., Hernández-Díaz, S., & Robins, J. M. (2004). A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology, 15(5), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43
Hernán, M. A., Sauer, B. C., Hernández-Díaz, S., Platt, R., & Shrier, I. (2016). Specifying a target trial prevents immortal time bias and other self-inflicted injuries in observational analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 79, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.014
Höfler, M. (2005). Causal inference based on counterfactuals. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-28
Howe, C. J., Cole, S. R., Lau, B., Napravnik, S., & Eron, J. J. (2016). Selection bias due to loss to follow up in cohort studies. Epidemiology, 27(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000409
Howe, C. J., & Robinson, W. R. (2018). Survival-related selection bias in studies of racial health disparities: The importance of the target population and study design. Epidemiology, 29(4), 521–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000849
Ioannou, G. N., Locke, E. R., O’Hare, A. M., Bohnert, A. S. B., Boyko, E. J., Hynes, D. M., & Berry, K. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness against infection or death in a national U.S. health care system: A target trial emulation study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 175(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.7326/M21-3256
Jones, T. W., Power, J., & Jones, T. M. (2022). Religious trauma and moral injury from LGBTQA+ conversion practices. Social Science and Medicine, 305, 115040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115040
Jowett, A., Brady, G., Goodman, S., Pillinger, C., & Bradley, L. (2020). Conversion therapy: An evidence assessment and qualitative study. Government Equalities Office. https://pureportal.coventry.ac.uk/en/publications/conversion-therapy-an-evidence-assessment-and-qualitative-study.
Madenci, A. L., Wanis, K. N., Cooper, Z., Haneuse, S., Subramanian, S. V., Hofman, A., & Hernán, M. A. (2021). Strengthening health services research using target trial emulation: An application to volume-outcomes studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(11), 2453–2460. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab170
Nardini, C. (2014). The ethics of clinical trials. Ecancermedicalscience, 8, 387. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.387
Ohlsson, H., & Kendler, K. S. (2020). Applying causal inference methods in psychiatric epidemiology: A review. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(6), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3758
Rudolph, K. E., Gimbrone, C., & Díaz, I. (2021). Helped into harm: Mediation of a housing voucher intervention on mental health and substance use in boys. Epidemiology, 32(3), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001334
Streed, C. G., Anderson, J. S., Babits, C., & Ferguson, M. A. (2019). Changing medical practice, not patients—Putting an end to conversion therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(6), 500–502. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1903161
Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
Sullins, D. P. (2022). Sexual orientation change efforts do not increase suicide: Correcting a false research narrative. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(7), 3377–3393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02408-2
Thomas, L. E., Yang, S., Wojdyla, D., & Schaubel, D. E. (2020). Matching with time-dependent treatments: A review and look forward. Statistics in Medicine, 39(17), 2350–2370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8533
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Broadbent, A., & Pearce, N. (2016). Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: The need for a pluralistic approach. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(6), 1776–1786. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv341
VanderWeele, T. J. (2019). Principles of confounder selection. European Journal of Epidemiology, 34(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6
Witte, J., & Didelez, V. (2019). Covariate selection strategies for causal inference: Classification and comparison. Biometrical Journal, 61(5), 1270–1289. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700294
Wright, T., Candy, B., & King, M. (2018). Conversion therapies and access to transition-related healthcare in transgender people: A narrative systematic review. British Medical Journal Open, 8(12), e022425. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022425
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have not disclosed any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivera, A.S., Beach, L.B. Unaddressed Sources of Bias Lead to Biased Conclusions About Sexual Orientation Change Efforts and Suicidality in Sexual Minority Individuals. Arch Sex Behav 52, 875–879 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02498-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02498-y